Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

African Colonialism Is a Problem to Africa's Future

Powerful Essays
1528 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
African Colonialism Is a Problem to Africa's Future
Using Colonialism to Stop it’s Own Problems: A Future for Africa Since the 19th century when colonialism began to sweep throughout the African continent, European nations have been the scapegoats for Africa’s economic, political, and social issues. In Paul Johnson’s article, “Colonialism’s Back-and Not a Moment Too Soon”, we see that the present-day generation in Africa has grown to believe that colonialism is “inherently evil”, due to many historical realities. In Wangari Maathai’s The Challenge For Africa, our eyes are opened to the multitude of issues that Africa faces everyday, many of which stemmed from nineteenth century colonialism itself. But, the inhabitants of Africa have yet to recognize the severity and consequences of the problems they have. These issues did in fact root from colonialism but the expansion of these problems comes from the African people themselves. It is true that Africa has a multitude of social and economic problems but, there is a definite way to fix them and to stop them from growing. Africans have been battling against colonialism since the nineteenth century. Samori Tuore fought against French expansion in the Western Sudan for years until he was eventually defeated. Lobengula was tricked into allowing the British into present day Zimbabwe, and they eventually took over his land. But, it wasn’t until The Berlin Conference in 1884 that truly sparked a turning point for African colonization. Countries like Great Britain, France, Portugal, Italy, and Germany began to expand their dominant reigns across the entire continent. However, instead of colonizing for the good of the people, they instead took over African land to solely benefit themselves and the European economy. Many European leaders took advantage of the rich land that Africa had to offer. Africa’s fertile soil was a feeding ground for European leaders who could easily produce raw materials and ship them back to their native country in order to make a hefty profit. As the twentieth century began, colonization only became worse for Africa. “…many colonial administrations had deliberately kept local Africans undereducated and prevented them access to the professional classes in order to avoid unnecessary competition…” (1). This form of oppression left newly formed, independent states, without educated leaders, causing many African nations to begin their decline in the early twentieth century. Angered by their dependence on the European nations, internal wars for political and economic control erupted in the 1970’s and 1980’s. Hundreds of thousands of African’s lost their lives but, it was a risk that they were willing to take in order to gain independence from the European nations. Although many nations, like Ghana, achieved this independence, their uneducated natives were not able to possess the qualities of a proper leader, taking their independence on a turn for the worst. Not only has the continent struggled due to the lack of strong leaders, Africa has developed many economic, social, and political issues since the time of decolonization in the 1960’s. In a speech from Kenneth Kuanda, the first president of Zambia, he states that most of Africa’s weaknesses are derived from lack of finance and trained personnel (2). Africa’s economy was on the line after decolonization. Colonialism forced many Africans into farming for cash crops but, after many nations declared independence, the prices of these cash crops fell drastically. For instance, the price of cocoa, which was produced in Ghana, fell in the 1960’s, beginning an economic decline for this newly formed independent country. Africa’s past proved to be a major contributor to its future problems. From early on, Africa had struggled with forming international allies. Rarely did any networks of communication, administration, and transportation between countries work effectively. It was true that the African people did not have the necessary tools or education in order to lead their own independent states. This lack of leadership skills is the backbone for the entirety of Africa’s problems within politics and the economy.
To the natives, it certainly seemed as if the Europeans were only trying to harm instead of help but, from an outside perspective, colonialism is what Africa needed to spark their independence. Africa has too many problems to deal with on it’s own, and it is time that outside forces stepped in more forcefully to help the nations rise up and stand on their own. “[Colonialism] It is a trend that should be encouraged, it seems to me, on a practical as well as moral grounds. There simply is no alternative in nations where governments have crumbled…”(3). In this article, Paul Johnson says it best that there is simply no other way for Africa to thrive without colonialism stepping in once again. Through the years, the problems in Africa have only grown exponentially. In 2005, half of the population of Sub-Saharan Africa lived on $1.25 a day. Presently, twenty-five million people in the Sub-Saharan area are HIV positive, causing the average life expectancy to fall. In the 2007/2008 United Nations Human Development Report, all of the twenty-two lowest rank countries were located in Africa. Since the end of colonialism in the 1960’s, these problems have certainly progressed and it is time for outside nations to step in to help control Africa’s problems.

In The Challenge For Africa, Maathai introduces the “three-legged stool”. This stool consists of three legs; the first stands for democratic space, the second stands for sustainable management of natural resources, and the third stands for fairness, respect, and compassion. I agree strongly with Johnson’s method of introducing colonialism again to the African people but, we can only step in if we follow the guidelines of the three-legged stool. This stool existed before colonialism and corruption but now, “…in the intervening years, the stool has been bashed, its legs broken, and then reconstituted with weak or pliable plastic…”(4). Paul Johnson’s colonialism exists of limited duration in order to ensure an effective self-government. This new form of colonialism does not wish to repeat the problems of the 1960’s, and the only way of doing so is by making sure that the country is economically and politically stable before the colonizing government leaves. Sure, it is easy for outside governments to give funds to African countries in order to fix their problems but, these funds will not fix the broken stool. Governments have to act alongside broken governments in third-world African countries in order to truly fix the ongoing problems, and to make them cease for good.
Africa has a lot to accomplish before it can fully reach independence and rid itself of colonial rule. In 2000, the United Nations developed the UN Millennium Development Goals (MDG’s), in order to increase global development policies and practices worldwide. By 2015, there are eight MDG’s to be met in Sub-Saharan Africa. African governments must eradicate poverty and hunger, achieve universal primary education, promote gender equality and empower women, reduce child mortality, improve maternal health, fight HIV/AIDS and other diseases, ensure environmental stability and finally, develop a global partnership for development. Three years does not seem like enough time for Sub-Saharan Africa to meet such extensive criteria but, with a plan for the future, they can take steps that will eventually lead them towards such success. I believe that a fix for Africa needs to come from within. Since the majority of Africa’s problems post-colonialism were due to lack of proper knowledge and leadership, it makes sense that Africa is in dire need of better education for its people. Knowledgeable countries like the United States, France, and Britain have the power and ability to institute a strong educational system, which would allow students, both young and old, to learn more about their own country and the outside world as well. We need to start with the children and teach them the fundamentals of a proper government, as well as leadership skills, so that as they age, Africa will continue to flourish. With a strong government background, the rest of Africa’s problems will almost all fall into place. The economy will be able to straighten itself out, for the most part, and the social issues of poverty and hunger will be eradicated over time. However, none of these future plans will be feasible without the help and support of colonialism. It takes a government to build a government, and Africa needs strong government support in order to assist them in building their own powerful administration. Without a revival of colonialism, Africa will not be able to reach its goals of meeting the eight MDG’s by 2015, leaving its problems to multiply as they have in past years.
A renewal of colonialism seems to be the only possible fix for Africa’s problems. Colonialism instilled many problems for Africa in the nineteenth century, causing its people to become hesitant about colonial rule in the future. Through Paul Johnson’s “new” form of colonialism, one in which the trustee must not withdraw until the country is economically and politically stable, Africa will no longer be in despair. Colonialism may have not been the best thing for Africa in the past, but it is the best repair tactic for the future.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The three decades following the Berlin conference were chaotic as European powers competed to occupy and colonize Africa. Europe would be profiting off the resources that they collected from their reaction to far much weaker subordinate African colonies. As Europe’s wealth amassed, Africa’s wealth approached its end. It was soon Eu European intruders as a much stronger force than themselves and lost all their ties to older tradition through fear. In 1886, the British government commissioned and administered the development of the which was signed by many African rulers (doc.1). These Africans gave in but the document does not specify if they gave in because they lost sights of the nation they were once before. Another document of the reason…

    • 850 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In the years that followed the Berlin Conference (1884-1885) European nations divided and colonized Africa among themselves. This time period became to be known as the Scramble for Africa. It would be years until Africa freed itself of European domination. Yet in the time that the Scramble for Africa took place, European dominance was met with various reactions from the native people. Some natives unwillingly submitted, opposed to the idea of European domination, but left with no other choice. Other natives were willing to compromise, while the rest were preparing or already rebelling against the…

    • 96 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    2009 Dbq Ap World

    • 659 Words
    • 3 Pages

    For years after the Berlin Conference, various European powers raced to occupy and colonize land in Africa. It was a time of growth for Europe, but what was it for Africa? Africa’s fate was being decided for it by the European invaders. Not all AFricans just stood by and watcher, however. There was a wide range of actions and reactions to the Scramble for Africa from the Africans themselves, from giving in peacefully to attempting to fighting back with all of their might.…

    • 659 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Life in Africa isn’t what it seems, they have this driving force behind European imperialism. All in all European nations competed with one another for control within the nations. The driving force behind European imperialism in Africa was imports, exports, technology, and malaria.…

    • 298 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    European imperialism has shaped the world over and over many times, acquiring many colonies throughout the globe. The colonization of Africa was no different for the Europeans. The need for raw materials motivated Europeans to acquire new lands in order to provide resources for their industrialized economies. The strong sense of a burden to civilize and enlighten others became the perspective for the approach of colonization.…

    • 538 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Much of Africa's history revolves around it’s interactions with Europeans. The Europeans exploited and conquered much of the African continent. They were able to conquer Africa through imperialism which is a process of invasion, attack and exploitation for natural resources. Africa had many natural resources that Europeans wanted to themselves and the only solution they came up with was to conquer Africa.…

    • 648 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Between the late 17th century and early 18th century, almost all of Africa was under European rule. This was in great contrast to 1880, when close to none of Africa was under direct rule of the continents. This stark change in power was due to the interest in raw materials, new trade opportunities, political gain over other countries, and Europeans feeling the need to spread Christianity, democracy, and capitalism. (Spielvogel and McTighe 230-233). Although European imperialism helped to "civilize" the people of Africa and develop the continent, this justification is far outweighed by the facts that Africans were treated with immense oppression and a disregard for their culture. After imperialism, African nations were better able to prosper…

    • 965 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The one key reason European leaders even bothered with Africa is that they knew resources would come and they would earn back money, and gain more money, while doing so. European leaders went to Africa to get gold. Gold was used in things such as jewelry. They wanted slaves, although slavery became outlawed.They hoped to either sell or make industrial and economic uses out of the minerals and other materials. Back in Document D, it was stated everything they hoped to achieve industrial wise. Europeans also wanted exports / imports to further…

    • 665 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    After World War II, the people of Africa fought to end the effects of European imperialism in order to achieve political independence and reclaim African culture. However, tensions caused by artificial political boundaries established by European powers exacerbated preexisting tribal and religious divisions. The newly ‘freed’ African states were unstable and struggled to deal with these conflicts, often resulting in civil wars and genocide. During this struggle, Africa received very little support to help develop African economies or governments from the very countries who caused Africa’s weak infrastructure. 19th-century European imperialism was a major factor in causing the political weakness within African states, but the fact that the solution…

    • 1720 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The last general motive behind European imperialism in Africa were cultural reasons. Industrialized countries felt as if it was their need to help less fortunate countries to lift them out of poverty and feed the “new-caught, sullen peoples, half-devil and half-child” (Document F). Document F also has a quote from Lobengula Khumalo, a chief leader in South Africa, stating how he felt as if England had crept up on his tribe’s territory and snatched it away, as a chameleon does to a fly, “England is the chameleon and I am the fly.”…

    • 405 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As the 20th century approached, more and more countries wanted more and more power. At the end of the 19th century, the Belgian King Leopold sent emissaries to the African Congo to establish trade. This single act caused France, Belgium, Great Britain, Germany, Spain, Italy and Portugal to go over to Africa and do the same. However, the European countries did not just establish trade, they invaded the African territory and took control over it. This became known as the Imperialist Scramble for Africa.1…

    • 1301 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    There are several reasons why the European nations competed with each other to gain colonies in Africa. They all wanted to gain power and prestige. The more territory that they were able to control in Africa the more powerful and important they thought they could become. Africa was tremendously rich in natural resources, which could be brought to Europe and turned into manufactured goods. Europeans also needed markets for their manufactured goods. These goods could be sold in Africa for large profits. Often a European nation would take over territory in Africa simply to prevent another European country from taking it.…

    • 1144 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The French and European powers wanted more direct control of their colonies during the 18th and 19th centuries than they did in the 15th and 16th centuries. This new period of Imperialism, led to the Europeans demanding more power over the political, economic, and social lives of all people. The Europeans looked at the Africans as not being able to handle the complex ideals of running a country. They wanted to make the land of Africa to have an economy that benefitted the European economy. They wanted the people already there to begin to follow their customs and traditions.…

    • 505 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Imperialism In Africa

    • 590 Words
    • 3 Pages

    How has the scramble for Africa affected Africans? Europeans have always been known to take over many territories. For example, the British have expanded their empire to Australia, Asia, and even the Americas. Although these changes have made what the world is today, nothing has changed more than Africa. Before Colonialism occurred, Africa traded with other parts of the world for centuries (RP #1). In the nineteenth century, the Europeans started to notice that Africa could be a “gold mine” for their own economy. As more Europeans started to invade Africa, much of Imperialism took place. The two main reasons for Imperialism and Colonialism in Africa were for trade and territorial control.…

    • 590 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    When Europe started to move closer inland of Africa, they started by making deals with the chiefs of native tribes. This started mostly with a journalists named H. M. Stanley. He explored Africa and made unfair treaties with leaders. He did this with support of the Belgian kind, King Leopold II. These treaties would often be something similar to, in exchange for a few yards of cloths and some trinkets, Belgium will be able to put their flag on the chiefs land and use the land as well as the people on it.5 Before Europe had come in and started to take over the land, the natives had known what resources they had and were very skilled in using them, and they lived largely off of trade with other regions and tribal communities. The had a livable system that was serving the community well. When Europeans took over, they saw many of the resources that were in Africa, such as diamonds and iron6 and knew the value of them on a bigger market and told the natives that there is much more worth in this land then they are getting out of it. The chiefs then let the Europeans trade the resources on a worldly scale, which, while it did give Africa a bigger, and more worldly economy, it quickly turned into a bourgeoisie/proletarian society with the African on…

    • 817 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays