The nature vs. nurture debate is one of the longest in the field of psychology. It is concerned with the importance of individual’s inborn qualities, their nature, versus their personal experience or their “nurture”(Ceci & Williams, 2000). Many psychologists disagree as to which plays a more important role on an individual. Psychologist Donald Hebb is said to have answered the question of which contributed more to the personality of a person with the response, “which contributes more to the area of a rectangle, its length or its width? (Ceci & Williams, 2000)”
One of the major issues that a researcher of nature vs. nurture dilemma encounters is determining how much influence genes and environment have on traits (Santrock, 2009). It is somewhat difficult to determine whether a trait is formed through heredity or from the environment (Ceci & Williams, 2000). One way in which researchers go about the process is by studying twins. Researchers study the behavioral similarities between identical twins and that of fraternal twins. Fraternal twins are no more genetically alike than regular brothers and sisters while identical twins are genetically identical. They then can do studies and discover which traits seem to be more heretical (Santrock, 2009). Researchers may also study traits and the influence of genes and environment on adopted individuals. They study to see whether or not the adopted persons characteristics are more like his adoptive parents, his nurture, or more like that of his biological parents, or his nature (Santrock, 2009).
Adoption is an institution that can greatly affect the development of a human being. Adoption is the social and legal process by which a parent–child relationship is established between persons unrelated at birth (Santrock, 2009). Adoption has been called the “quintessential American institution, embodying faith in social engineering and mobility (Melosh, 2006).” While the modern form of adoption was created in the United States, the world has a long history of the institution. Originally the practice was used on young adults for political reasons in the Roman Empire. They would adopt young men to create an heir to their estates (Melosh, 2006). Infant adoptions were rather rare. The modern form of adoption we know today came as a result of the aftermath of the Civil War. The war caused an overcrowding in orphanages around the country. Minister Charles Loring Brace became disgusted with seeing all of the homeless children so he came up with an idea. He wrote “The Best Method Of Disposing of Our Pauper and Vagrant Children” in 1859. This essentially started the Orphan Train movement (Melosh, 2006). The trains shipped an estimated 200,000 children from the major cities in the East to rural towns. At first the children were indentured to families to work but eventually this made way to the institution of adoption as we know it today (Melosh, 2006).
The affects that adoption plays on the development of an individual are somewhat difficult to gage. Researchers tend to agree that is indeed does play a role on the development of a person....