Preview

Act Utilitarianism

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
916 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Act Utilitarianism
Oh My Gosh! Did Someone Say A Bomb!!
I believe torture is morally justifiable/permissible only with situations, in which you can guarantee the best possible outcome. In this particular situation with the bomber, I believe we should take the Utilitarian-Act Consequentialism approach; and torture the bomber as an attempt to get him to reveal the location. Simply because, Act Consequentialism will focus more on the overall happiness that it will bring to all those involved. Seeing as how they have apprehended the bomber, and interrogated him to no avail. It is the police commissioners only hope to confirm the publics’ faith in the system; which should clearly be capable in making decisions that are ugly but necessary, for securing the safety of others. I believe that Act Consequentialism allows for the attempt to torture both the bomber alongside his wife, if it leads to the discovery of the bomb. An excerpt in which describes my reasoning in the belief that Act Consequentialism will allows this notion is: 'Act Consequentialism holds that the good determines the right - the only consideration relevant to the rightness of an act is the amount of goodness it produces'. 1 (McNaughton and Piers Rawlings pg32) from David McNaughton and Piers Rawlings essay on Deontology. Versus the Kantian and Rule Consequentialism of utilitarianism which would believe that this is morally wrong, despite of the lives that could be saved. Rule Consequentialism and Deontology are very similar in their beliefs. For example, this was said in regards to Rule Consequentialism: 'In particular, rule consequentialism is likely to include constraints, options, and special obligations. There will, for example, be a fairly simple rule against killing the innocent, since the adoption of a more complicated rule that allowed killing in pursuit of the good would be hard to follow'. 2 (McNaughton and Piers Rawlings pg34)
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Deontology vs. Consequentialism
    • 1233 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Deontology vs. Consequentialism

    Even though Deontology and Consequentialism can be extremely similar, both contain key factors that make each idea unique and very different. Sometimes, it may appear that both these theories simply arrive at the same conclusion by way of different paths. While this is sometimes true, it is important to understand how these theories differ. Each of these braches of Ethics deals with morals, actions, ethical decisions and judgments. Beyond the surface though, each of these Ethical ideas begin to differ greatly. Deontology is the theory and/or idea that judges the morality of an action based on the action’s adherence to the overall rules. Consequentialism is the theory and/or idea that the morality should be judged on the action’s overall outcome or consequences. Both theories judge morality. However, Deontology judges morality based on the actions themselves, while Consequentialism judges morality based on the end reaction. Out of these two ethical theories I believe Consequentialism to be least likely to be false.…

    • 1233 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Act Utilitarianism Case Study
    • 462 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Act Utilitarianism Case Study

    The essential part of utilitarianism, whether it is Act or Rule, is to promote the greatest overall utility for the given situation. If we look in terms of Utilitarianism, one would be in favor of killing Tom to save the other four children. Even though, Tom would be killed, he would promote overall utility by saving four people through his one body. This reminds me a lot of the Trolley problem we studied in Unit five. They killed one man to save multiple. This may be considered immoral in a way, but according to Act Utilitarianism, the correct choice and the one that promotes overall utility would be to kill Tom and use his body to save the four siblings. In an Act Utilitarian’s mind, they would first think “In what way could I promote the greatest utility for every single person in the situation?” They must then think about the situation. The mother and father could either lose Tom, or they could lose their other four children. The Doctor could either kill Tom and save the four children or let Tom live and watch the others die…

    • 462 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Utilitarianism Act Research Paper
    • 341 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Utilitarianism Act Research Paper

    Utilitarianism Act means to do the right action that will benefit a good amount of people over any other option. In the two examples I read from Bernard Williams “A Critique of Utilitarianism” I realized those were two difficult choices these two men had to make. However, if we follow the Utilitarianism Act, George would of taken the job offer and Jim would unfortunately sacrifice one of the protestors to save the rest. By George taking the job offer, it would benefit his family financially and also help his family’s emotional battle. Also, George opposing chemical and biological warfare would mean he wont have much interest compared to the other gentlemen that had much more interest on the subject. This will benefit a large amount of people…

    • 341 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Comparing Ethical Theories
    • 510 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Comparing Ethical Theories

    Deontology is defined by the moral obligation of rules and duties. The rules and duties are based on the correctness or principle of an action without regard to consequences. This compares to utilitarianism where the right action is determined by how the action brings about the greatest utility to the group as a whole (Boylan, 2009). Both theories disregard the consequences of that action. Deontology ignores the all consequences, where utilitarianism ignores the consequences to the individual.…

    • 510 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Act and Utilitarianism
    • 677 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Act and Utilitarianism

    Assess the view that a religious concept of love is the most difficult to put into practice. (20 Marks)…

    • 677 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Sociological Perspective On Death Penalty
    • 859 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Sociological Perspective On Death Penalty

    may not have been an official ceremony or ritual, but it has always been present…

    • 859 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Utilitarianism Classical Utilitarianism
    • 996 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Utilitarianism Classical Utilitarianism

    Classical Utilitarianism is a moral philosophy, which was developed in 19th century England by Jeremy Bentham, John Stuart Mill and Henry Sidgwick. The essential feature a utilitarian reside in, is the notion that an action is right if it produces the most amount of happiness well limiting suffering. Utilitarianism focuses solely on the consequences of the action, in an attempt to bring about the most happiness from each situation, well ensuring everybody’s happiness is equally considered.…

    • 996 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Explain Utilitarian Ethics
    • 616 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Explain Utilitarian Ethics

    Utilitarian ethics is an expansive field of normative ethics that believes that the action that you take should be that which maximises utility, that is to say prospering and maximizing happiness whilst mitigating suffering or sadness as much as possible. Whilst it was once often considered a hedonistic field, there being one that argues pleasure being the only true, intrinsic good or aim, it is now more commonly referred to that of a consequentiality field, focussed more on consequentialism. It may be argued then that there is quite a difference between the seemingly 'old Utilitarianism' and that of the new consequentialism.…

    • 616 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Utilitarianism Vs Deontology
    • 492 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Utilitarianism Vs Deontology

    Deontology steps in where utilitarianism fails, utilitarianism fails in the idea that there are absolutely morally forbidden actions. But, in reality, even the worst actions are not always wrong, given extreme circumstances. Deontology is all about duty and moral laws. For instance, if a person does a good act, and it has a good outcome, from a utilitarianistic view, this person was right. However, in deontological view, this person is only right if the decision was made or action taken with good intent, in following his or her sense of duty and the moral laws. There is an obvious question that sticks out in this reasoning: what are the moral laws, and where do they come from. According to Immanuel Kant, the man who started…

    • 492 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Why Is Torture Acceptable
    • 1705 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Why Is Torture Acceptable

    If a bomb is about to explode in New York and the police have captured the man responsible, are they morally allowed to torture him in order to get the diffusion codes? This is a topic of interest in the government and public right now, as people are debating whether or not torture is ethically right. Many people in the United States, especially in the military, claim torture can be very effective in gaining information, and that it can even save lives. While others, including the Catholic Church, state that torture is intrinsically evil and never an acceptable option. Torture has been a method of interrogation for thousands of years. To torture somebody is to inflict physical or psychological pain onto them; it is used for both punishment and to extract information from prisoners. The latter is why the military has been torturing terrorists at Guantanamo Bay and various other locations. While some people argue that torture for interrogation purposes is necessary, the Catholic Church states it violates human dignity and is rarely useful, and therefore is unacceptable.…

    • 1705 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Ethics Essay
    • 647 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Ethics Essay

    Deontological ethics basically is cut and dry in other words it’s like black and white. According to "Deontological Ethics" (2007), “The most familiar forms of deontology, and also the forms presenting the greatest contrast to consequentialism, hold that some choices cannot be justified by their effects—that no matter how morally good their consequences, some choices are morally forbidden.”(para. 2). Deontological is the basic…

    • 647 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Utilitarianism
    • 1415 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Utilitarianism

    Utilitarianism is the view that an act is right if it equals the greatest happiness for the greatest number of people. Utilitarians describe moral actions as actions that boost something good and lessen something that is bad. Virtue, knowledge, and goodwill are all good but they are only good if they give people a pleasurable existence. Pain is the only thing that is intrinsically bad. Utilitarians focus on the result of an act instead of the inherent nature of the act. An example would be an individual throwing their garbage into the ocean. Utilitarians would say throwing garbage into the ocean is not necessarily bad, but the effect it leaves will cause harm sooner or later and that is what is bad. I do not think that utilitarianism can be an ethical theory. It is simply too difficult to determine whether the utilitarian theory can be justified. The dilemma of trying to focus on a positive outcome or focusing on the actions that we take in order to accomplish the greatest good is too hard to measure.…

    • 1415 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Explain a Relativistic Theory of Ethics
    • 638 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Explain a Relativistic Theory of Ethics

    Situation ethics maintains that it’s the consequences of actions which determine whether an action is right or wrong, so it is very much a consequentialist position.…

    • 638 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Deontological Approach In Criminal Justice
    • 515 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Deontological Approach In Criminal Justice

    One of the differences is that deontological is a normative theory that deals with the choices of what is required, forbidden or even permitted. Therefore, it guides and assess our choices for what we should do in a situation. Now consequentialism is different normative properties of different kinds of things but it still deals with the act of what is right but in a different way than deontological. It also deals with whether an act was morally right and if so what are the consequences for that act.…

    • 515 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Argument For Utilitarianism
    • 1157 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Argument For Utilitarianism

    Among the ethical arguments that we have seen, it is clear that a form of utilitarianism is the best option, that is, we should always do what brings about the best outcome where the outcomes are rated by the amount of good they bring about. The utilitarian argument says that in any given decision, the option that brings about the most good is the right thing to do every time. That being said, the definition of good is extremely important to the soundness of the argument. In this case, the best view of what is good is that of a hedonist, that is, a thing is good if it brings about pleasure and bad if it brings about suffering. To add to this however, I would argue that the best good outcome is the outcome which…

    • 1157 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More

Related Topics