Grand Canyon Universuty
March 10, 2013
The two theories that I will be comparing are Krashen and Chomsky’s theories on language acquisition. The explanation of Krashen’s theory can be summarized as “two independent systems of second language performance: 'the acquired system' and 'the learned system'. The 'acquired system' or 'acquisition' is the product of a subconscious process very similar to the process children undergo when they acquire their first language. It requires meaningful interaction in the target language - natural communication - in which speakers are concentrated not in the form of their utterances, but in the communicative act.” (Schutz, 2007)
Chomsky’s theory can be summarized as “an innate processes. Innate is something which is already there in mind since birth. The theory proposed by Chomsky is proved by the children living in same linguistic community. Moreover, they are not influenced by the external experiences which bring about the comparable grammar. He thus proposed his theory on language acquisition in 1977 as "all children share the same internal constraints which characterize narrowly the grammar they are going to construct." He also proposed that all of us live in a biological world, and according to him, mental world is no exception. He also believes that as there are stages of development for other parts of the body, language development can also be achieved up to a certain age.” (Singhal, 2010) There are many differences and similarities in the two theories mentioned above. The similarities between the two are that they are both about the development of children. There are many differences between the two starting with the way that the children develop and pick up language. Krashen basically says that children develop their language and vocabulary unknowingly through conversation and interaction between people. The main focus is not in how the...
Please join StudyMode to read the full document