Preview

Accounting Horizons

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
8094 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Accounting Horizons
American Accounting Association
DOI: 10.2308/acch.2010.24.2.279

Accounting Horizons
Vol. 24, No. 2
2010
pp. 279–296

COMMENTARY

The American Accounting Association’s
Financial Reporting Policy Committee’s
Response to the Preliminary Views on Financial
Statement Presentation
The Financial Reporting Policy Committee of the Financial Accounting and
Reporting Section of the American Accounting Association
Mark Bradshaw, Carolyn Callahan, Jack Ciesielski, Elizabeth Gordon,
Mark Kohlbeck, Leslie Hodder, Patrick E. Hopkins, Robert Laux,
Sarah McVay, Thomas Stober, Phillip Stocken, and Teri Lombardi Yohn
SYNOPSIS: The Financial Accounting Standards Board and the International Accounting Standards Board ͑hereafter, the Boards͒ issued the discussion paper Preliminary
Views on Financial Statement Presentation in late 2008. The Boards propose to significantly reconfigure the presentation of financial statements to offer parallel statements with standardized partitions of each financial statement into five categories: business activities, financing activities, income taxes, discontinued operations, and equity. The allocation of transactions within these partitions will depend crucially on management’s assessment of each transaction ͑i.e., the management approach͒. In this paper we comment on the proposal, with particular emphasis on empirical evidence and relevant theories from academic research. We highlight benefits of the proposed changes as well as some possible concerns. We conclude that the objective of providing a cohesive picture of activities through a uniform standardization of each financial statement by activity is desirable, but the proposed criteria for how activities are categorized results in potentially aberrant or confusing outcomes. Thus, any dissatisfaction with the current financial statement format may be replaced with other criticisms. Finally, the current proposal relies on the effectiveness of the management approach, which can



References: Ashbaugh, H., and P. Olsson. 2002. An exploratory study of the valuation properties of cross-listed firms’ IAS and US GAAP earnings and book values Ball, R., and P. Brown. 1968. An empirical evaluation of accounting income numbers. Journal of Accounting Research 6 ͑Autumn͒: 159–178. Barth, M. E., D. P. Cram, and K. K. Nelson. 2001. Accruals and the prediction of future cash flows. The Accounting Review 76 ͑1͒: 27–58. ——–, J. Elliott, and M. Finn. 1999. Market rewards associated with patterns of increasing earnings. Journal of Accounting Research 37 ͑2͒: 387–413. Berger, P., and R. N. Hann. 2003. The impact of SFAS No. 131 on information and monitoring. Journal of Accounting Research 41: 163–223. ——–, and ——–. 2007. Segment profitability and the proprietary and agency costs of disclosure. The Accounting Review 82: 869–906. Bodie, Z., A. Kane, and A. J. Marcus. 1989. Investments. 3rd edition. Burr Ridge, IL: Irwin. Botosan, C. A., S. McMahon, and M. Stanford. 2009. Representationally faithful disclosures, organizational design and managements’ segment reporting decisions ——–, and M. Stanford. 2005. Managers’ motives to withhold segment disclosures and the effect of SFAS No Bowen, R. 1981. The valuation of earnings components in the electric utility industry. The Accounting Review 56: 1–22. ——–, A. Davis, and D. Matsumoto. 2005. Emphasis on pro forma versus GAAP earnings in quarterly press releases: Determinants, SEC intervention, and market reactions Bradshaw, M., and R. Sloan. 2002. GAAP versus the street: An empirical assessment of two alternative definitions of earnings Burgstahler, D., J. Jiambalvo, and T. Shevlin. 2002. Do stock prices fully reflect the implications of special items for future earnings? Journal of Accounting Research 40: 585–612. Damodaran, A. 1996. Investment Valuation, Tools and Techniques for Determining the Value of Any Asset. Dechow, P. M. 1994. Accounting earnings and cash flows as measures of firm performance—The role of accounting accruals ——–, and W. Ge. 2006. The persistence of earnings and cash flows and the role of special items: Implications for the accrual anomaly. Review of Accounting Studies 11 ͑2-3͒: 253–296. ——–, S. P. Kothari, and R. L. Watts. 1998. The relation between earnings and cash flows. Journal of Accounting and Economics 25 ͑2͒: 133–168. ——–, S. Richardson, and R. Sloan. 2008. The persistence and pricing of the cash component of earnings. Easton, P., and T. Harris. 1991. Earnings as an explanatory variable for returns. Journal of Accounting Research 29 ͑1͒: 19–36. ——–, and J. Pae. 2004. Accounting conservatism and the relation between returns and accounting data. Engel, E., M. Erickson, and E. Maydew. 1999. Debt-equity hybrid securities. Journal of Accounting Research 37 ͑2͒: 249–274. Ettredge, M., S. Kwon, D. Smith, and P. Zarowin. 2005. The impact of SFAS No. 131 business segment data on the market’s ability to anticipate future earnings Fairfield, P., R. Sweeney, and T. Yohn. 1996. Accounting classification and the predictive content of earnings. ——–, and T. Yohn. 2001. Using asset turnover and profit margin to forecast changes in profitability. Review of Accounting Studies 6 ͑4͒: 371–385. Financial Accounting Standards Board ͑FASB͒. 1985. Elements of Financial Statements. Statement of Financial Accounting Concepts No. 6. Norwalk, CT: FASB. Frost, C.A., and G. Pownall. 1994. Accounting disclosure practices in the United States and the United Kingdom Harris, M. 1998. The association between competition and managers’ business segment reporting choices. Herrmann, D., and W. Thomas. 2000. An analysis of segment disclosures under SFAS No. 131 and SFAS No. Hirst, D., P. Hopkins, and J. Wahlen. 2004. Fair values, comprehensive income reporting, and bank analysts’ risk and valuation judgments Hopkins, P. 1996. The effect of financial statement classification of hybrid financial instruments on financial analysts’ stock price judgments Kinney, M., and R. Trezevant. 1997. The use of special items to manage earnings and perceptions. Journal of Financial Statement Analysis ͑Fall͒: 45–53. Koller, T., M. Goedhart, and D. Wessels. 2005. Valuation: Measuring and Managing the Value of Companies. Kormendi, R., and R. Lipe. 1987. Earnings innovations, earnings persistence, and stock returns. The Journal of Business 60 ͑3͒: 323–345. Lipe, R. 1986. The information contained in the components of earnings. Journal of Accounting Research 24 ͑Supplement͒: 37–64. Maines, L., and L. McDaniel. 2000. Effects of comprehensive-income characteristics on nonprofessional investors’ judgments: The role of financial statement presentation format Mashruwala, C., S. Rajgopal, and T. Shevlin. 2006. Why is the accrual anomaly not arbitraged away? The role of idiosyncratic risk and transaction costs McVay, S. 2006. Earnings management using classification shifting: An examination of core earnings and special items Moehrle, S. 2002. Do firms use restructuring charge reversals to meet earnings targets? The Accounting Review 77 ͑2͒: 397–413. Nissim, D., and S. H. Penman. 2001. Ratio analysis and equity valuation: From research to practice. Review of Accounting Studies 6 ͑1/March͒.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful