Preview

Absolutism vs. Democracy.

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
578 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Absolutism vs. Democracy.
If a country were choosing it's government, and I was the one who was to decide if we were to follow a democracy or an absolute ruler, I would select a democracy. Democracy is the only government where the people wont have their freedoms taken by one person and no one can abuse their power. Democracy is more effective then absolutism in that power is separated in 3 branches, this way of government is firmly believed in by Montesquieu. Another positive from democracy is that people are given the right to free speech, which was written about in many of Voltaires' books. Democracy and freedom are also taught in John Lockes' book, he believed in the nature of being free, equal and independent. Democracy is the way!

A French speaker named Montesquieu wrote a book called "The Spirit of the Laws". And in this book (as seen in document 6) Montesquieu tells us that there can be no liberty in which the executive, judicial and legislature branches are all controlled by one man. The only way to have a well run civilization is one in which power is separated. If you were to split power into 3 branches of equal power and importance, then they may act as a check on each other. This is also called checks and balances. With this system of checks and balances, it keeps one person or small group of persons from gaining power and driving a well-organized union into fragments.

Another French philosopher names Voltaire was a strong believer in free speech. He said in one of his books (as seen in document 5) that the best government is in which the laws equally protect all men. He believed that no matter if you were right or wrong, high-class or poor, you should have the right to say anything you want. Even if he disagreed with your opinion, he would defend your right to say it. He was eventually exiled and had all of his books burned. He still did not give up his belief that people should have freedom of speech. He was also against divine right and that does not exist within a

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Checks And Balances Essay

    • 623 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Our checks and balances system is an endless circle of power. Delegates at the constitutional convention did not want any one man or group of men to have all the power over the United States of America. They were afraid that if they gave too much power to one person or a group of people the United States would end up in a dictatorship. In order to avoid such problem they divided the government into three branches: executive branch, legislative branch and judicial branch.…

    • 623 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Constitution guarded against tyranny through checks and balances. Checks and Balances is where the three branches work together to make sure no one branch has too much power. Each branch receives control over the other branches. James Madison, Alexander Hamilton, and John Jay wrote the federalist papers in 1787 and 1788. According to Doc. C, and Federalist paper number 51,” Constant aim is to divide and arrange the several offices is in such a manner… check on the other.” James Madison, is explaining how the government got split into three branches. Next he explained that the three branches were framed/setup to check on each other…

    • 162 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The system of checks and balances is an important part of the United States Constitution. The three branches of the government representing the separation of powers – executive, legislative, and judicial – each hold specific responsibilities. Checks and balances is a method set in place so that no branch of the government can become to powerful by allowing each branch to limit the powers of the others. This is accomplished by each branch checking the powers of the other branches to ensure the balance between all three. “The rationale of the separation of powers is often elided with the rationale of checks and balances and with the rationale of the dispersal of power generally in a constitutional system” (Waldron).…

    • 799 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In some governments, one group of people have all of the federal government’s power. One example is Japan’s “Big six” group during World War II. The “Big six” comprised of the top three political leaders and the top three military leaders in Japan. The Emperor of Japan normally didn’t make any choices in the government; the “Big SIx” had total control of Japan during World War II. The U.S. Constitution avoids that from happening by separating the powers of the government into three branches of government: the legislative branch, the executive branch, and the judicial branch. The Senate and the House of Representatives make up the legislative branch. The legislative branch makes the laws for the country. The executive branch is the President of the United States, the Vice President, and the presidential cabinet. The executive branch will enforce the laws. The judicial branch is the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court will determine if the laws are constitutional or…

    • 737 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Absolutism created a time of prosperity throughout the 1500s and the 1600s. At this point of history, absolutism was an efficient way of running a government. Absolutist leaders were vigorous, assertive and a potent symbol of authority. The amount of industrial growth in countries such as Russia was both efficient and effective because the power of authority was concentrated into one person’s hands. Absolutism enabled Peter the Great to modernize and adapt Russia for war, commerce and industrial growth. Additionally, absolutism gave people a powerful leader they needed to trust in and depend on for their country's sake. This type of regnant is most evident King James I of England and King Louis XIV of France. For example, King James…

    • 257 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Tyranny Dbq Analysis

    • 997 Words
    • 4 Pages

    This system was I will show examples of how this system works, such as the legislative branch overrides the executive by overriding the president’s veto. The executive branch can override the legislative branch because the president can veto congressional legislation. Executive over Judicial by the president being able to nominate the judges. The Judicial over executive by the court being able to declare presidential acts unconstitutional. The Judicial over the legislative by the being able to declare laws unconstitutional. Congress over the courts because the senate confirms the president’s nominations, congress can impeach judges and remove them from office. If you search up a picture of the Checks and Balances system you will then see how this system balance each other out. As James Madison once said, “The constant aim is to divide and arrange the several offices in such a manner as that they may be a check on the other.” Basically what he is saying is that each one of these positions check and balance each other out. So this is the second to last document, this system makes sure no branch is too powerful. And so far as you can see this system really helps with guarding us from tyranny by checking and balancing each other…

    • 997 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    When the Framers of the constitution were in the process of creating a government, they had in mind a government that was ruled by the people. Where everyone had a voice and could have say in what the government was doing. In order to avoid a monarchy such as the one they had been used to under British rule, the framers came up with a system of checks and balances. Checks and balances keeps one branch…

    • 879 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Madison also stated that if an individual group of people had power in more than one branch, then that was tyranny. They would be able to manipulate and unbalance the branches. Others agreed with him because no one wanted to end up like the country they left. They wanted everything to be equal, and they didn’t want any supreme power. Furthermore, the Constitution and it’s creators state that the three branches of the government have power over each other in different ways to keep each other balanced. For example, the legislative branch, or Congress, can impeach the president if they are not doing their job well. The president can veto laws that Congress vote on if he or she thinks the law should not pass for whatever reason they have. But, if Congress still believes the law should pass, they can vote again and the law will pass automatically if more than two thirds of congress is for the law. In this way the Legislative and Executive branches are balancing each other by keeping laws and the president in check. The Judicial branch also helps balance the other branches. The Judicial branch can declare laws and acts of the executive branch unconstitutional. Congress can impeach judges and agree/disagree on the president’s choices of the…

    • 483 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    “While the colonies where under the ruling of King George and a monarchy with absolute power until 1776 when the colonies declared independence, they learned that this type of government was an unfair and oppressive system” (“The Colonies Under British Rule”). With the past leaderships in mind, the framers designed and wrote the constitution to distribute separation of powers; the three branches of government. Each branch was formed and given a certain set of responsibilities. A system known as Checks and Balances was put into order to ensure that one branch does not obtain more power over another. As time has progressed, the different branches have grown stronger as well. They work hand in hand to ensure that the country is running smoothly, and guarantees that the rights of the citizens are not…

    • 299 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    James Madison argues how checks and balances can not only advocate a separation of powers but also create an effective government. Madison writes to help his readers understand how a well structured government can lead to a successful country. One of his main arguments is that no branch should have too much power, therefore, different branches of government should exist. "Legislative, judiciary magistracies should be drawn from the same fountain of authority, the people, through canals having no communication whatever with one another." To assure greater independence, government is separated into the Legislative Branch, the House of the Representatives and the Senate. He states "Ambition must be made to counteract ambition." meaning the ambitions of legislators must be checked by the executive and judicial branch which is then checked by the ambitions of legislators and presidents. This separation of powers advocated the idea of compromise. Madison also asserts that the members of each branch should not be too dependent on the members of the other two branches. If a man is presented with too much power, it may rule over him. Madison states "If men were angels, no government would be necessary. " The government must control the people but control itself as well. While the will of the people is no doubt the primary control on the government, other controls are necessary.…

    • 491 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Which form of government was most effective during the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries? Absolutism or Democracy?…

    • 924 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The constitution created an ingenious way to avoid tyranny of one branch over other branches, with a system of checks and balances. James Madison wrote in the Federalist Paper”…the constant aim is to divide and arrange the several offices in such a manner as they may be a check on…

    • 649 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    All branches are able with certain precautions to prevent against concentration and misuse of power. The idea of checks and balances has been generally effected in a variety of constitutional governments, including the United States, where powers are distributed between three branches: the legislative, executive, and judicial.…

    • 1637 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Dual Sovereignty Analysis

    • 482 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Framers believed that “liberty would be more secure if the national government’s powers were divided into three branches—a bicameral legislature with the power to make laws, an executive with the power to enforce them, and a judiciary with the power to interpret the laws”, (Kanovitz, 2012, p. 9). The Framers of the constitution did this because of their experience with the British Parliament. For this reason they were fearful of a concentrated rule or single authority. It encouraged the Framers to develop democratic government rather than a monarchy. Dividing the rule of government into three divisions of powers allows for a system of check and balance. In this way, not one system of government has more power or influence over the other.…

    • 482 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Poverty In Haiti

    • 926 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The many branches of a republic have checks and balances, so that not all of the power goes to one person or division.…

    • 926 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays