aaaaaaaaaaaaa
Topics:
Dot-com bubble, Stock market bubble, Stock market Pages: 7 (2376 words)
Published: March 13, 2014
1 Bubble growth
2 Soaring stocks
3 Free spending
4 The bubble bursts
5 Aftermath
6 List of companies significant to the bubble
7 See also
7.1 Terminology
7.2 Media
7.3 Venture capital
7.4 Economic downturn
8 References
9 Further reading
10 External links
Bubble growth[edit]
Venture capitalists saw record-setting growth as dot-com companies experienced meteoric rises in their stock prices and therefore moved faster and with less caution than usual, choosing to mitigate the risk by starting many contenders and letting the market decide which would succeed. The low interest rates in 1998–99 helped increase the start-up capital amounts. A canonical "dot-com" company's business model relied on harnessing network effects by operating at a sustained net loss and to build market share (or mind share). These companies offered their services or end product for free with the expectation that they could build enough brand awareness to charge profitable rates for their services later. The motto "get big fast" reflected this strategy.[citation needed] Soaring stocks[edit]
In financial markets, a stock market bubble is a self-perpetuating rise or boom in the share prices of stocks of a particular industry; the term may be used with certainty only in retrospect after share prices have crashed. A bubble occurs when speculators note the fast increase in value and decide to buy in anticipation of further rises, rather than because the shares are undervalued. Typically, during a bubble, many companies thus become grossly overvalued. When the bubble "bursts", the share prices fall dramatically, and many companies go out of business. American news media, including respected business publications such as Forbes and the Wall Street Journal, encouraged the public to invest in risky companies, despite many of the companies' disregard for basic financial and even legal principles.[4] Andrew Smith argued that the financial industry's handling of IPOs tended to benefit the banks and initial investors rather than the companies.[5] This is because company staff were typically barred from reselling their...
Continue Reading
Please join StudyMode to read the full document