Preview

A Presidential Debate Analysis

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
351 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
A Presidential Debate Analysis
A presidential debate is an honest and collaborative effort to explore issues however, it is a competition. Although each candidate is working towards the main goal, a better nation, they are not working together to achieve it. Furthermore, each candidate is seeking the truth, yet is trying to win the election. There are a handful of occurrences in the 2008 McCain and Obama debate where each candidate points out the past mistakes of the opposing man, instead of focusing on how to repair the fault. Obama points out a few of McCain’s mistakes and how he is promising different tasks without explaining the process. In addition, Obama mentions McCain’s name when talking about America’s budget increasing. He wants to associate the troubling cost
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Pros And Cons Of Reince Priebus
    • 468 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Pros And Cons Of Reince Priebus

    The entire spectacle appears to be a disingenuous attempt by the media to have even legitimate grievances about the debate formats. Because these are not really debates, in the sense that they don’t allow candidates to fully articulate positions, but rather to deflect and defend themselves while attacking opponents’ positions. Reasoned arguments are nearly impossible with eleven people on a single stage, each one trying to stand out from the others. These debates are spectacles, entertainment for the masses and nothing more than excuses for partisans to do…

    • 468 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Hillary And Trump Rhetorical Analysis
    • 152 Words
    • 1 Page

    Hillary And Trump Rhetorical Analysis

    Hillary and Trump both had very persuasive speeches, they both used the three appeals very differently, like Hillary used the emotional appeal more and Trump used the logical and the ethical appeal more. They both were very well thought out speeches and they both spoke to the delegates at each convention plus the people that were watching on TV. They both made an a point to at least try and use all three rhetorical appeals to be the most persuasive they can be, but in the end, its up to what people in America see fit. Its up to the Americans to go over everything the candidate believes in and what they say in these speeches to decide who would be the better president. Hillary and Trump both have many reasons why they feel they are the best…

    • 152 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Pros And Cons Of Third Party Debates
    • 423 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Pros And Cons Of Third Party Debates

    debates have occurred regularly and are becoming institutionalized as a practice in American elections. Third-party candidates have fewer chances to join presidential debates, especially if the two major party candidates do not agree to debate them. Unless it becomes in the interest of both parties to have a third-party candidate debate, as it was in 1992 with Ross Perot, it will be very difficult for third-party candidates to become a part of the presidential debates. Even though third parties have debated each other in presidential election years, the fate of third parties in receiving national coverage or joining the two major party candidates in presidential debates is uncertain. It is also unclear how much effect debates have on American…

    • 423 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Rhetorical Analysis Bill Clinton
    • 201 Words
    • 1 Page

    Rhetorical Analysis Bill Clinton

    Bill Clinton is a master of communication. He communicates his emotions and people respond to that. "Pathos" is the pillar that he uses most. We want the sense of community so he gives us the opportunities. He has an enthusiasm and excitement while talking. He willing to share that enthusiasm when exposed to anyone. "Logos" is the next pillar he uses for communication. He is very clever and he has good memories. When he prelects, he can easily give exactly the numbers, the information of the problem. When everyone knows him is Bill Clinton, "Ethos" will be appear. He is a famous person so his speech has absolute conviction. He uses "pathos" and "logos" most because that is his characteristic. He uses "ethos" least because he does not want…

    • 201 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Hilary Clinton Debate Analysis
    • 227 Words
    • 1 Page

    Hilary Clinton Debate Analysis

    With the elections less than a few months away, political debates always seem to get the best of politicians and their supporters. This year’s debate was nothing short of unexpected controversies. Shortly after the debate held on the night of September 9th, uproar arose all over America after the remarking comments that candidate Hilary Clinton made about Donald Trump and his supporters.…

    • 227 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Vice-Presidential Candidate Analysis
    • 958 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Vice-Presidential Candidate Analysis

    Vice-Presidential candidates Mike Pence(R) and Tim Kaine(D) took to the stage Tuesday to debate which of their running mates could best lead the United States through a turbulent period in its history.…

    • 958 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    The Party Decides Rhetorical Analysis
    • 1131 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The Party Decides Rhetorical Analysis

    Often in political campaigns, political scientists wonder and theorize factors that allow certain individuals to win and become president. Political scientists over several decades and a few centuries completed thought experiments and research subjects that large influence on the election process. Marty Cohen, David Karol, Hans Noel, and John Zaller, writers of The Party Decides, believed that high ranking officials inside each party decide which candidate represent their party in the presidential race. Their study focused primarily on specific tasks and duties officials had to do to move up in ranks inside their political parties, but the authors of The Party Decides fail to take into account how important social media will become modern campaign…

    • 1131 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Trump Presidency Rhetorical Analysis
    • 829 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Trump Presidency Rhetorical Analysis

    United States foreign policy in central and east Africa has remained relatively consisted since the 1990s. The Clinton, Bush and Obama administration worked with, as President Bill Clinton labelled ‘new generation’ of African leaders to help bring stability and Western oriented market-focused economic development policies. Western assistance composed on the premise of foreign aid for social development of schools, healthcare facilities and progression in human rights. It does not often cover when African states fall into chaos from wars, massacres and genocide, American presence is largely absent. The Mogadishu line, famous after eighteen U.S. soldiers died in a raid in 1993, still persists with America’s hesitation to use its military in Africa for missions beyond state interest and security. Rwanda experienced this first hand during its 1994 genocide.…

    • 829 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Tension City
    • 1331 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Tension City

    Cited: Lehrer, James. "Killer Question." Tension City: Inside the Presidential Debates, from Kennedy-Nixon to Obama-McCain. New York: Random House, 2011. 30-50. Prints.…

    • 1331 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Pros And Cons Of Presidential Candidates
    • 563 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Pros And Cons Of Presidential Candidates

    Presidency is a strong idea in America. It elects our highest executive leader, the president. A good strong, experienced president is a viable resource. Just to be clear, a president should be experienced in someway . They should first occupied a spot in government such as a governor or senator. They will have a voice and understanding in politics, know about foreign policies and politics, and they will know their way around the government. Think about, who would want a presidential candidate without any political experience or would they? As history has shown, freshness has ruled. Even today, presidential candidate Donald Trump is winning. He has no political experience, however he has considered by New York Republicans to be governor in October 2013, but he never ran. This is the most controversial question in politics, maybe. Should amateurs be allowed in the oval office?…

    • 563 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Republican Argumentative Essay
    • 169 Words
    • 1 Page

    Republican Argumentative Essay

    Terrorism has taken part of all of our lives. At least once a week, some type of terrorism has happened or tried. President Obama discussed how he took cautious views on fighting terrorism and Isis. Mr. Obama is reluctant to having more Americans die fighting at war with terrorism. Although, it's also understandable to just want to end the war completely. This is the Republicans argument. Republicans would just like to send troops to fight the war in the Middle-East ending once and for all. In order to the long awaited war, it takes more resources, like machinery, weapons, money, and troops. Republicans also feel the situation we're in now, it's vital to demolish any chance of Iran having nuclear weapons for protection of America and the rest…

    • 169 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Debate Vs. A Dialogic Argument
    • 460 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Debate Vs. A Dialogic Argument

    The interview with Jon Stewart and Bill O’Reilly was full of negative comments made to ensure that each party felt like they won, while trying to prove the other completely wrong. The environment was not focused on truth seeking, or finding a solution. These two reasons are why this interview was a debate, and not an argument.…

    • 460 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Persuasive Essay On Presidential Elections
    • 947 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Persuasive Essay On Presidential Elections

    Although it is a difficult task, winning debates can raise the polls in your favor. This was displayed in the 2012 presidential elections. When “Romney mauled the president in Denver, the wind and weather of the campaign shifted dramatically” (Halperin and Heilemann 2) implying that the loss of the Denver debate severely injured Obama’s polls. It is a debate such as the one in Denver, that can have a dramatic effect on the outcome of the race. No one knows who would have won the election had Obama continued to lose debates after that. As you can see debates tend to be one of the most important parts of the elections. They allow for an environment where the public can hear the ideas of the future leader as well as understand their demeanor when stressed or unprepared. The topics of the debates may be known however, the responses of the other political candidates are not. This means to succeed in a debate takes a lot of practice as well as preparation. The existent president demonstrated adequate preparation for a debate as “it was almost 2:00am [and] Obama’s team was clustered in the workspace, reading transcripts” (4) therefore displaying the hard work and preparation put into the debate in order to find success. It is the moments of determination like this that allow a president the lead in a debate ultimately helping them to secure votes for…

    • 947 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Presidential Debate
    • 548 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Presidential Debate

    Having his first experience moderating a presidential debate on Monday, NBC “Nightly News” anchor Lester Holt chose three major subjects of the debate, which were “America’s Direction,” “Achieving Prosperity,” and “Securing America.” The questions were asked expertly, relating to some crucial problems that the nation currently faces and citizens are concerning about. Holt, registered as a Republican, remained mainly unbiased during the debate, except the time…

    • 548 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Debate Phrase
    • 573 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Debate Phrase

    (1) 1st Proposition opening, definition, teamline, own arguments (3) 2nd Proposition rebuttal of 1st Opp., rebuild own case, own arguments (5) 3rd Proposition general rebuttal, rebuild own case (8) Proposition Reply (1st or 2nd speaker) biased summary (2) 1st Opposition accepting definition / redefinition, teamline, rebuttal of 1st Proposition, own arguments (4) 2nd Opposition rebuttal of 2nd Prop., rebuild own case, own arguments (6) 3rd Opposition general rebuttal, rebuild own case (7) Opposition Reply (1st or 2nd speaker) biased summary…

    • 573 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More

Related Topics