A Comparison Of Bolman And Deal's Four Hats

You will not survive even if you will be smartest one; people who can adjust have got more chances to do it (Darwin, n.d.). With this words, I want to start my essay, due to the reason that it will help to understand the topic. During the classes we tried to understand the change in higher education, especially among universities; without belittling the importance of tradition and experience, the need to maintain continuity and ensure the stability of development, manifestations reasonable and careful attitude to the fact that "not fashionable", but better.
To understand change as phenomena we used 1o analytical lenses, which are the mix of best points of Bolman and Deal’s four frames model and de Bono’s six thinking hats. Bolman and Deal’s four frames consist of
43). the limitation of the above-mentioned approaches became a reason of the creation of ten analytical lenses (Buller, 2014, p. 49). Using this approach helps to decide whether to proceed with a change process and what actions need to be done to enhance the expectation of success. To focus on a different perspectives we can attire ten analytical lenses, such as: (i) the 20/20 lens, type of the lens which objectively and clearly sees a proposed change; (ii) the concave lens are trying to see the general picture; (iii) the convex lens sees a picture paying attention to details; (iv) the telephoto lens uses distance to see the possible outcomes of the change; (v) using the bifocal lens we can pay attention to infrastructure, things people, ideas and cultural context; (vi) the