HEAVY NONSTANDARD/BAD ESSAY
Throughout history, societies have always held their different viewpoints on governmental decision making. Societies have also held their different viewpoints on the roles of citizens in this decision making. This process can range from absolute control by a single individual or a few individuals to a political system that is a democracy. It’s many good and bad things to both systems of government. There are forms of government with only one person in charge. The citizens don’t have no say in the decisions that are made. The leader has complete control, and he has total control. Mussolini was this kind of leader in Italy. He made all of the rules. Mussolini was a very harsh ruler. He gained many thing for Italy. These things might not have never been accomplished in a democracy. Mussolini's form of government was known as fascism. There are some downsides to forms of government with only one person in charge. Many times the people rights are denied. This causes them to become unhappy. This makeØ them want to fight the unfair government. This caused the French Revolution. Some people wanted to have a more democratic government. This revolution was not successful in the end. France returned to a form of government with one man as its ruler. Rulers that are like kings believe that free elections should not be held. This would put power in the hands of the people. This is absolutely against that type of government. This is a disadvantage. The ruler cannot be replaced unless he Ø overthrown. A bad leader will just not be elected again in a democracy. Leaders that are like kings may bring good things to they country. They might bring economic reform. They might also bring economic growth, but their rule may result in problems for the citizens. The problems lead to revolution. The opposite of a government with only one person in charge is democracy. The government representØ the people in a democracy. The citizens are encourageØ to take part in government. They have a say about what decisions are made for their country. They are able to make choices during free elections. The people choose the candidate they feel would do the best for their nation. This sort of government was found in Ancient Athens. They encouraged people to take part in the government. It was a responsibility of all AthenianØ to take part in their democracy. All of the power Ø not put all under one person. This is an advantage. This prevents the leader from making bad decisions. There is an example of this. The English Bill of Rights written in 1689 is the example. This limited the powers of the king. It allowØ parliament to challenge the kingØ decisions. It seems to be that in democracy fewer problems occur. The people are the ones who make the decisions. They are satisfied most of the time with it. Democracy has a negative side to it. Citizens take their rights too seriously. They take advantage of them. A leader that is like a king would be more successful in this case. He would easily be able to control the people. He could smash any threats to the government. It’s good things and bad things to both systems. It seems that democracy is a better choice in the end. The U.S. and England are democratic nations. They seem to have fewer problems than governments that are not democratic like Cuba and Russia. Both have had they bright points and dark points. (586)
HEAVY NONSTANDARD/GOOD ESSAY
Throughout history, societies have held their different viewpoints on governmental decision making and the roles of citizens in this decision making process. This process can range from absolute control by a single individual or a few individuals to a political system that is a democracy. It’s many advantages and disadvantages to both systems of government. In a totalitarian form of government, the citizens don’t have no say in the decisions that are made. The dictator has complete and total control. An example of this was...
Please join StudyMode to read the full document