Preview

22nd Amendment

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
414 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
22nd Amendment
The proposals that have been put forth to repeal or modify the 22nd amendment are constitutionally incorrect. The proposal to revise the 22nd amendment should be challenged. This amendment is indeed necessary to safeguard and prevent the developments of a virtual dictatorship.
The approach to change the amendments for our future and current presidents and holders of other offices should not be modified in the intent of bettering the community. "The Nations first president had the opportunity to be elected for a third term, but declined it, suggesting that two terms of office was enough for any president." As source A, states the fact that George Washington had more than enough time to make a difference to society. According to source C "The two-term limit that stood for 142 years was broken by the 26th president; Franklin Roosevelt, and after Roosevelt died in his fourth term, the opposing Republicans heavily supported the draft for the 22nd amendment." The fear of the Democratic Party holding office long after the two-term tradition led to the promotion of the 22nd amendment.
Source E identifies graphics in which challenge the revision of the 22nd amendment, the chart demonstrates percentages of 19 states that are in favor of the term limits. Source E also identifies picketers "Vote for new faces" in city hall, demonstrating the preference of term limits. "Pointing out the possible blunders of Bill Clinton and the remainder of his second term in office Source F claims Clinton will be the lamest of the lame ducks who ever hung around Washington, killing time." During the duration of the second term not many presidents have provided the nation with trivial matters.
The slight modification of the 22nd amendment could in fact provide the United States with a fallback plan for the safety of the nation. Source B identifies "The 22nd amendment should say two consecutive terms instead of two terms in a lifetime, which could allow an individual to run after the initial

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In the Federalist No. 72, Alexander Hamilton states that re-eligibility should be ensured in order to prevent an executive from extending his term in office unconstitutionally. Hamilton presents five effects that would occur if a president would only be allowed to serve for a single term. Some of the effects that Hamilton presented are, a reduction in the president’s motivation to be on his best behavior since he would not be concerned about getting re-elected. Another issue that would result if re-eligibility would be denied is that if a president who holds office is obsessed with wealth he might get involved in corruption since he would soon be prohibited from office. The author’s purpose is to establish re-eligibility in order for an executive…

    • 248 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    4. "Jim DeMints Views on Term Limits." Charlston Charleston Tea Party. n. page. Print. <http://charlestonteaparty.org/senator-jim-demint’s-views-on-term-limits/>.…

    • 2378 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Though not affecting any candidates in the field, having an amendment be ratified during the election cycle is historical. The twenty second Amendment was ratified during this election. This laid out the two elected term limit for presidents. (1948 Presidential Election)…

    • 1887 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Dbq Louisiana Purchase

    • 412 Words
    • 2 Pages

    George Washington’s Presidency established the rule that a president was only supposed to serve two terms in office. This unwritten rule was only ever broken by Franklin Roosevelt during WW II, and it later became an Amendment to the Constitution. Second, Washington talked at great length about isolationism in his farewell address, specifically citing that America should avoid foreign entanglements in Europe.…

    • 412 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Term Limits Case Study

    • 899 Words
    • 4 Pages

    With citizens having the right to make their own decisions in life that includes having the right to pick and vote for their choice of any representatives in government. But if term limits were to make its way into the Constitution, they would infringe on American citizen’s rights and free will to select their choice of representatives in any office. According to the article Are Term Limits Undemocratic?, “term limits were undemocratic because they prevented voters from freely exercising their judgement to retain experienced representatives if voter wished” (Elhauge 1997). If term limits were required, the question that would be asked is why should voters be punished and deprived of their choices of representatives all because that person has already served the time allotted to government representatives. Many Americans often times vote for the same representatives in office, but if term limits were put in place then they would determine who could or could not run for office at any…

    • 899 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Ellie started with Aristotle and described his six forms of government. She wanted to repeal the 22nd amendment that limited a President’s term to eight years total. She talked about checks, circumstances, and qualities. Ellie started to point out what might their opposing team would say: “One shall not hold ALL the power”. However, she rebutted the claim by saying, “If the Americans want a President to stay for sixteen years then he should ought to people, by the people, for the people”. She used Franklin D. Roosevelt as an example on how 22nd Amendment should be repealed. FDR helped the U.S out of depression, which took him four terms to do. Ellie argued that he would not be able to do it if he only served for two terms. Also, it could not happen if we have two different conflicting ideas.…

    • 248 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Supporters quote Continental Congress member Thomas Jefferson who in 1776 warned of the dangers if representatives remained in office too long and suggested a proposed limit to congressional tenure. Jefferson stated “to prevent every danger which might arise to American freedom by continuing too long in office the members of the Continental Congress… shall not have served in that office longer than two years” (Jefferson). I have identified three main pros that term limit supporters rely on to defend their position, yet they tend to overlook the cons that occur with term limits in…

    • 1119 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    This group, however, was not the first to speak in support of presidents holding more than two, four-year terms in office. One of the earliest such people was Alexander Hamilton with his plan for how the president should be elected, which was discussed in class. The Hamilton plan of a “life monarch”, who was free from public control, was not exactly what those against the twenty-second amendment had in mind, but it is probably similar to what the supporters of the amendment most likely…

    • 1495 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Two-term Presidency was a policy George Washington believed should be followed by future presidents because he did not want to give the impression that the president was like a elected king. This precedent lasted until Franklin D. Roosevelt served more than two terms. This precedent has a great impact on presidents that possess the ability to continue has president.…

    • 442 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In approaching the 22nd amendment of the Constitution, I strongly feel that it should be left alone because either President Clinton or Bush should be allowed to run for more than two terms. American people are use to being able to vote for a new president especially if the one that is in office is not doing a…

    • 949 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Having an unlimited number of terms is very excessive. People would become tired of the same president for years and years. This allows prohibits those who don’t support the president to have the same person, with the same ideas run the country for years on end. Congress would be tired of working with the same president so little would get accomplished. The 22nd amendment was put in place after Franklin Delano Roosevelt was president for four terms. Since he ended up dying during his four term congress created the amendment limiting a president to only two terms. By adding this amendment to the constitution, it prevents the president from causing corruption and becoming senile as they become older. I also don’t agree with idea of having a president only be able to serve one term that last six years because that would be a very lengthy amount of time for only one term. Holding an election every six years seems like too long a time to get the opinions of new generations. Elections measure the opinion of the public, so holding election every six years wouldn’t be an accurate representation of our country as a whole. Having a term be four years allows the people to vote for other candidates if they don’t support the current president or their beliefs have changed. It also allows us to keep the same president for another 4 years if they are a good leader for the…

    • 617 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In agreement with perspective one, my perspective also supports the establishment of term limits. Perspective one favors term limits and describes the many ways it affects our government in a positive way. Perspective one provides reasons to support why term limits matter, such as giving citizens more options of candidates. On the contrary, perspective two disagrees with the idea of term limits. The main reason for this argument is based on experience. Perspective two expands its explanation of experience by describing how new people would substantially affect the government in a negative way due to their lack of experience.…

    • 485 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    17th Amendment

    • 298 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Seventeenth Amendment made it so there would be two senators from each one of the states, voted in by the people. The senators would be given a six year term and have one vote each. They added an article to the amendment so when vacancies happen in the senators seat the state legislation would assign someone until the people voted a senator in.…

    • 298 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Term Limits In Congress

    • 841 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Supreme Court stated the only way imposing term limits could be constitutional is by amending the Constitution (Philips, 2016, para. 3); however, this is an exceedingly difficult objective as it would require two-thirds vote from both chambers of Congress, and then must be ratified by at least three-fourths of the states (Phillips, para. 8). Expecting Congress to support an amendment that limits the tenure of their power is quite an unrealistic expectation that would likely have the same amount of their support as say proposing to reduce their salaries or benefits. Members of Congress posses a self-interest in prolonging their tenure in office which, unfortunately, has failed to fulfill the wishes and best interest of the…

    • 841 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    In 1787, with America in it’s infancy, the Anti-Federalists wrote responses to the Federalist papers and the Federalist support of what became the U.S. Constitution. The Anti-Federalist response (unlike the Federalist) was not coordinated, but was effective in voicing valid concerns about the formation of our government.…

    • 1598 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Best Essays