TWELVE ANGRY MEN
Was Henry Fonda convinced right from the start of the case that the boy was not guilty? He was not absolutely sure that the boy was guilty but he was sure that the evidences provided are not strong and sufficient enough to proof the boy guilty of murder. So he decided to dig deep in to the case and analyzed the evidence technically to make sure if they are worthy of declaring the boy guilty of the charge. So from the beginning of the case he was convinced that there is some grey area that needs to be verified before any decision. He started from saying that the boy is not guilty and that there is a possibility that the provided proofs are not so influential. He was pre-planned that he will not give-up the decision on the basis of vote call and that he will discuss it deep into the hard facts with others until he will be convinced enough to called the boy “Guilty”. He also did some homework for the case like arranging a similar “Knife” and brainstorming with the evidences. Because he thought that it is his responsibility to confirm the charge on the boy as “one man was already dead and the life of another man was at stake”. So with his logical reasoning and leadership skills and effective communications he successfully influences the decision of others. He was well aware of his responsibility and throughout the conversation he was focused on what was his objective and how can he lead others to it. Though the task of changing others’ decision was not an easy one but still Henry successfully accomplished it.
Which strategies did Henry Fonda use to influence people?
1. Henry used Personal Power to influence other by creating an environment where all of them can argue with each other and remained sensitive to view-point of others. He put aside his ego and remained tolerant to the arrogant behavior of other Jurors. He was focused to his objective and responsibility. He projected himself to be unbiased and he was not working in self-interest....
Please join StudyMode to read the full document