12 Angry Men Movie Analysis

Topics: Decision making, Decision making software, Decision theory Pages: 3 (1168 words) Published: November 23, 2011
Course: HRMG6200 Organization in New Economy
Assignment: Twelve Angry Men Movie

The movie Twelve Angry Men is about the twelve jurors that could adjust their influence in a decision-making process for conviction an eighteen years-old boy, whether the boy guilty or not guilty in murdering of his father. It represents a perfect example for applicable of a work group development framework. It also has examples of influence techniques among a group’s members. This paper is looking at those specific examples in the movie and focusing in analysis the reasons why Juror 8 is so much more effective than others in the meeting. According to Bruce Tuckman, healthy work groups need to go through four stages of development: Forming, Storming, Norming, and Performing. Forming define as members get acquainted and organized to select a leader, a given example for the forming stage in this movie is the twelve men were up for the first vote, engaged in social oriented behavior to become acquainted with one another. The lead juror introduced to everyone “why are we here.” Storming are power struggles and sub-grouping, given example here is one juror voted “not guilty” while other eleven jurors voted “guilty”. It formed a perfect conflict that led group members device by two sub-group, vote guilty group and vote not guilty group, seat back for digging deep into the provided evidences to make sure if they are worthy of declaring the boy guilty of the charge. Norming define as group chooses rules to coordinate interaction and facilitate goals, given example here is when the twelve men rejected the prejudice of a tired voting, six “guilty” versus six “not guilty.” Another good example for Norming is when “We nine need to understand why you three still think he is guilty.” Performing define as the group structure enables working together smoothly toward one goal. It is when they all agreed on only one common right answer “the boy is not guilty”. The twelve jurors were going through...
Continue Reading

Please join StudyMode to read the full document

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • 12 Angry Men: Analysis of the Movie Essay
  • 12 Angry Men Analysis Essay
  • 12 Angry Men Analysis Research Paper
  • Essay on 12 Angry Men: Analysis
  • 12 Angry Men: Classic Movie Essay
  • 12 Angry Men (Movie of 1957) Essay
  • Essay about 12 Angry Men Analysis
  • 12 Angry Men Analysis Essay

Become a StudyMode Member

Sign Up - It's Free