You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
6th Amendment guarantees you a speedy trail, an impartial jury, that the accused can comfort the witnesses against them, and must be allowed a…
- 791 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
On the other hand, juror 10 is a loud mouthed, racist bigot. He scolds people he doesn’t agree with and a low opinion of people living in slum areas. Juror #10 is the character who brings in the most prejudice to the jury room as he has formed his decision from the moment he saw the young boy and sees no reason for him to waste any time debating on whether the defendant is guilty. His prejudice comes from the fact he used to live in the “slums” and considers people like the defendant to be “trash”. This is established when he states “well take a look at them…you can’t believe a word they say…they act different… they don’t need any big excuse to kill someone. (59) This man is very…
- 491 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Soon after the men gather in the deliberation room the foreman suggests a vote. All of the jurors except Henry Fonda suggested the boy was guilty. Fonda, is unsure of the defendant's guilt or innocence himself, even though his fellow jury members all disagree…
- 1676 Words
- 7 Pages
Good Essays -
1. Each Act takes happens in the same place. The entire play takes place in the jury room of a New York City court of law in 1957 during a very hot summer afternoon. It is a large, dull, minimalistic room with three windows in the brick wall which the skyline of New York City can be seen. There is also a wash room and lavatory off the jury room. There is a large, scarred table in the centre with twelve chairs around it. There are pencils pads and an ashtray on the table. There is also a water cooler in the room with plastic cups. The dullness of the room may signify and provide a mood for the act and is evident in the interactions between the jurors. The Twelve jurors are all seemingly awkward and uneasy towards each other once they enter the room.…
- 1553 Words
- 7 Pages
Powerful Essays -
At the beginning of Twelve Angry Men by Reginald Rose, the jury has just finished listening to six days of trial proceedings. A nineteen-year old man is on trial for the murder of his father. The defendant has a criminal record (and a lot of circumstantial evidence piled against him). The defendant, if found guilty, would receive a mandatory death penalty.…
- 1927 Words
- 8 Pages
Powerful Essays -
In the film Twelve Angry Men produced by Reginald Rose begins when a young teenage boy was on trial for murdering his abusive father. All the evidence and facts brought to the trial was against him, however, the twelve jurors had to make a verdict whether the boy is guilty or not guilty, and they decision would concluded whether the boy should or should not be sent to the electric chair. In process of making a verdict, the twelve jurors came together to reason and decide the fate of the boy. The verdict began with eleven guilty to one not guilty. Juror number 8, who voted not guilty did not believe on the evidence because, he believed that the murder weapon could be available to anyone, so he had purchased a look alike knife. Which made some…
- 407 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
The first clause of Amendment Six is the speedy trial clause. There are several reasons that this clause is positive to the accused in a case on trial. Primarily the right to a speedy trial can prevent undue and oppression, and minimize the anxiety and concern that accompanies public accusation. A speedy trial can limit the possibility that long delay will impair the ability of an accused to defend himself. Furthermore, delaying a trial is can tamper with the evidence and witnesses because over time evidence can lose value and witnesses could forget what happened at the the crime scene or even die before the trial takes place. The right of a speedy trial can also be in opposition to the interests of the accused because it can cause the accused…
- 1701 Words
- 7 Pages
Good Essays -
Throughout the years of America, we had many juries during criminal trials to decide if the defendant guilty or not guilty. In the 1957 movie, 12 Angry Men shows the best representation of American jury system and how people change their minds. 12 Angry Men shows that personal feeling get in the way in their votes. The movie is about how 12 jurors decide the fate of young boy that persumed he killed his father, while during the initial vote only Juror 8 raised his hand not guilty. Then throughout the movie and script each of the 11 jurors for various reason change their votes to not guilty. The 12 jurors change their votes from guilty to not guilty through character flaws, positive personality traits, expertise on the evidence, and pattern of behavior.…
- 1116 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
Reginald Rose’s play, Twelve Angry Men, is about a jury’s decision making process in a murder trial. The facts in this play become blinded by the prejudices that some Juror’s possess. A prejudice jury became formed due to a biased testimony and the facts became clouded as generalisations were formed by the Juror’s. Some Juror’s bigotry can be based on their past experiences and discrimination didn’t only happen to the defendant, but it was also experienced by Juror’s themselves…
- 853 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
“In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial…
- 1666 Words
- 7 Pages
Best Essays -
For fans of courtroom dramas and crime television, these court case movies all revolve around the courtroom. Unlike the orderly process of a real courtroom, the stories are filled with drama, intrigue and corruption. Getting to the truth is seldom as straightforward as it appears within these hit movies.…
- 610 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Write a one page response, skipping lines, for EACH question for a total of two pages.…
- 125 Words
- 1 Page
Satisfactory Essays -
In Rose’s play version of the story there are more racial issues. The problem in the play is that defendant is black and juror three is very prejudice. Juror three wouldn’t change his vote to not guilty for this very reason. He believed that the defendant was guilty without even talking about what happened that night with the other jurors. All of the jurors in the play version were white. Racial prejudice was very common when this play was written. In Friedkins film version although he showed that the whole story wasn’t focused on the racial prejudice issue. In the film version the jurors were white, black, and Mexican. The defendant in the film version was Mexican as well. In Friedkins version there was still a slight issue with racism, but it wasn’t as obvious as the play version Reginad Rose wrote. Lucky in the play version juror eight had a good heart because he’s the one that wanted to give this young boy a chance. He was trying to persuade everyone that the things that the witnesses were saying weren’t adding up. He didn’t care what color the defendant was he was trying to serve justice. By the end of the play though they all proved to juror three that the defendant was not guilty.…
- 563 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
The Sixth Amendment provides many protections and rights to a person suspected or accused of a crime. One of these rights is to have his/her case heard by an impartial jury. This right is particularly important based on the fact that the people determining your guilt or innocence should make a neutral decision, based on the facts of the case and what they feel is accurate, not how they see you as a person.…
- 272 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
This amendment gives the right to a speedy trial so people cannot be held in jail for long periods of time.…
- 544 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays