Preview

10 Images of Phillipine Politics

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
531 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
10 Images of Phillipine Politics
10 Images Of Philippine Politics

1. Board-room politics
- Involves decision-making by business elites and professionals, but with important public consequences.
2. Bureaucratic politics
-Means rule making and adjudication by bureaucrats, with inputs from clients and professionals, Dept. Secretaries, U. secretaries, A. secretaries, regional directors, bureau directors, are power and authority holders and as such can make decisions favoring private businesses and favored political interests. This is the reason why politicians and some businessman jockey their men into positions in the bureaucracy.
3. Congress politics
- Involves policy making by legislatures, constrained by various constituencies. Laws affect private and public interests. The process of legislation in formulating policies can delay the passage of a bill or the proposed bill can be stopped at the committee hearing level.
4. Chief executive politics (CEOs)
Refers to a process dominated by president governors mayors and their advisers. Chief executives are given full power and authority to lead, to govern and administer laws. They possess and exercise discretionary powers that are beneficial to majority but detrimental to some few. When they talk everybody listens.
5. Court-room politics
- Refers to court orders and decisions of judges, justices, and prosecutors in response to interest groups and aggrieved individuals. When judicial decisions are sold or influenced based not on merits and evidences, and then the court would have served no purpose as balancer and equalizer of justice and settlement of disputes between and among litigants.
- Court decisions can put political opponents to jail, can delay political and non-political appointments, can delay the execution of legislative, executive and administrative decisions or even stop the operation of businesses, and can decide to reverse or delay decisions previously made. The issuance of TRO reveals how political our court.
6.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Rulemaking

    • 999 Words
    • 4 Pages

    According to Cornelius Kerwin, "Rulemaking is the single most important function performed by agencies of government…Rulemaking refines, and in some instances defines, the mission of every government agency. In so doing it provides direction and content from budgeting, program implementation, procurement, personnel management, dispute resolution, and other important government activities" (Preface XI). This is the foundation for the book, Rulemaking. The whole text primarily revolves around this statement. Throughout the book Kerwin's central theme is that rulemaking is the single most important function that any government agency has within its possession. Much like other admin law books he discusses how those agencies with their rulemaking powers interpret legislation and proceed forward with making policy.…

    • 999 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In the book “The Hollow Hope” by Gerald Rosenberg discusses notion that there are two major schools of thought and the way that courts should view their powers. The Dynamic court which is a court that is powerful and a court that can create social change. The Constrained Court is a court that is powerless and cannot create social change because of lack of power and influence.…

    • 1975 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    only they can exercise actual authority, creates a special privileged group of bureaucrats.” The unofficial…

    • 680 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Supreme Court has been given credit and blame for having a wide range of effects on society. The decisions that they have made on current and past issues have initiated change in American society. These changes have had both positive and negative results. The effects of their decisions have ranged from improving the status of certain ethnic groups to limiting the procedures of law enforcers and clearly defining the rights of lawbreakers. In essence, Supreme Court decisions have had a profound influence on the behaviors of citizens as well as the political structure of this nation.…

    • 1883 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Bureaucracy Essay

    • 611 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Each bureaucracy has a set of written rules that everyone in that bureaucratic system must adhere to. By having these rules,…

    • 611 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Court History and Purpose. The courts are a critical component of American criminal justice because they determine what should happen to people charged with violating the law. Courts are important beyond criminal justice, too. Disputes that arise between private parties, businesses, government officials, and the like are brought to court in order to ensure that they are heard, ideally, in a neutral forum (Siegel, Schmalleger, & Worrall, 2011). Succeeding in liberation and independence is difficult within the world and as simple as legally right and legally wrong. Courts emphasize on the power of the state and the legitimate use of force and protect people against the random use of legislative authority. The tension among the general public independence and social order is long-lasting. The court front-runners recognize it is never just one way to handle a situation, the need for an unbiased and self-governing court is embedded in the social circumstance. To understand the whole court process there are three distinct elements that have to be consider to become a court, it must have proper legal authority and have all of the guild lines within the constitution. Courts are generally found in the judicial as opposed to legislative and executive branches of government, and ‘courts are empowered to make decisions that are binding. The notion of “deciding upon cases, controversies in law, and disputed matters of fact” is known as adjudication, or “the process by which a court arrives at a decision regarding a case” (Siegel, Schmalleger, & Worrall, 2011).…

    • 1187 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Palko Case Summary

    • 761 Words
    • 4 Pages

    courts of the United States. As the times change and cases are reviewed, the ruling for a…

    • 761 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The United States Constitution is often loosely interpreted to meet the issues of the present. In the words of former Justice Charles Evans Hughes, "We are under a Constitution, but the Constitution is what the judges say it is”. (Hughes) Judicial activism and judicial restraint are the philosophy and the reason behind the majority of judicial decisions. Most people are often confused over the true meaning and their proper applications. The theory of judgment that takes into account the spirit of laws and the changing times is referred to as judicial activism, and judicial restraint looks at strict interpretation of the law and the importance of legal precedent. To figure out whether a judge or court is considered to be an activist or restrained, you must look back at the history of judgments made by either the judge or the court.…

    • 780 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Judges' decisions can make life easy or difficult for ministers, Mps and civil servants, so in this respect their decisions are bound to be 'political'. One example was when the Thatcher government tried to ban key civil servants working at GCHQ, the top-secret government communications centre, from joining a trade union. It was a judge who had to rule whether the government had the power to take away this 'right.'…

    • 515 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    For an example. Let’s say a federal officer wants to strip search you. That person has done nothing wrong, but the police officer disagrees and says he needs to strip that person to prove it. Under the criminal justice system, you get to bring that argument to a judge, who will issue a ruling only after listening to the government’s reasons for wanting to strip search you and your reasons for why they shouldn’t be allowed to do that. In the event that the judge rules against you and finds that the police officer has probable cause to search you, not only do you have a right to appeal that judge’s decision all the way to the Supreme Court, you are welcome to talk to as many reporters, friends, relatives, and elected officials as you want to…

    • 163 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    1. Does MNLF headed by Nur Misuari has a right of title over areas of Mindanao.…

    • 1370 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    According to Renaldo Mendoza, executive director of the Asian Institute of Management (AIM) Policy Center, “political dynasties continue to monopolize political power in many local governments like provinces, municipalities and cities nationwide, and categorized current reigning political clans as “fat” or “thin” dynasties.” Mendoza said “fat” dynasties are political families that have several members holding elective positions in a certain local government for three years. A “thin” dynasty is a political clan that only has two members – like a father and son – swapping certain positions, as when a mayor-father, at the end of his maximum three terms, lets his son, who may also have reached his three-year term either as vice mayor, councilor, provincial governor or vice governor, running for each other’s position, he added. In Maguindanao, the “fat” Ampatuan dynasty held eight out of the 37 mayoralty posts in the province’s 37 municipalities, Mendoza said. Other provinces with a big number of fat dynasties include Apayao province, Dinagat Islands, Siquijor and Sulu.…

    • 968 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Constitutional Law Outline

    • 9868 Words
    • 40 Pages

    Historically disputes of the legal effect and meaning of something is solved by the judicial branch.…

    • 9868 Words
    • 40 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Philippines, as a democratic country, adapts the libertarian culture that John Stuart Mill believes to be the best for achieving intellectual and social development. Every Filipino citizen is sovereign and free to do what he wants as long as he does not harm others. Mill’s proposed ways to obtain ‘social liberty’, which are having the political liberties and having the constitutional system are being exercised on the country.…

    • 512 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Philippine Government

    • 988 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Looking back to the previous government systems in different periods in Philippine history, we can see that our present government system is somehow shaped and patterned from the previous systems that prevailed in our country. Pre – historically we have seen how they established their government and basically, we can say that it is far more primitive than the present system that we have. However, the basic principles like the consultation of the datus to the elders can somehow be seen in the present by the presence of political advisers where our president consults aside from the members of the senate and the congress. The barangay system that existed before still exists now as the smallest governmental unit in the society. The taxation system that evolved through time is still being practiced up to the present government.…

    • 988 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays