Preview

05 02 Magazine Template 1

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
289 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
05 02 Magazine Template 1
Name:Johan Febres

Teacher:Simona Hulubescu

5.02 Magazine Template
You will compare an absolute monarch with a constitutional monarch. Select one monarch from each l

5. Add the caption for your constitutional monarch HERE.

A better place to live ?

Phillip II was the king of Spain he was the king of a lot more places like naples England ,Ireland and he was the lord of 17 17 provinces of the netherland, he was know in spain as phillip the prudent, he rise to power because he was the son of charles V , he build the el escorial palace , lost the spain netherlands colonies in the ductch revolt , he tried to invade england, he was judge a lot and this make a little bit difficult to rule and the was a with poor health and this was a challenge for him because he was sick , he influence the militaru politic ideas .
James II was the king of England and Irland he was the roman catholic monarch to reign over england scotland and irland , he was the second surviving son of charles I he was describe as a constitutional monarch because he wasn’t the only one witwih power and vote he , he rise to the power because of his father , he was part of the glorious revolution ,he take england into new levels he promote catholicism and he did other stuff ,he has a lot of challenges because he has problems with other countrys and he faced the rebelion, he influence with the parlament . they have some rules similar like the militar ideas and politic ideas new thinking , they ruled different becouse Phillip II was the only one in the power and
James II no he was with the churhc they have a

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    )Compare Lao-tzu’s view of government with of Machiavelli in the next selection. Consider what seem to be the ultimate purposes of government, what seem to the obligations of the leader to the people being led, and what seems to be the main work of the state. What comparisons can you make between Lao-tzu’s Master and Machiavelli’s Prince.…

    • 514 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    An absolute monarch has both positive and negative affects as a system or government. One positive attribute is organization. In document eight, Louis the 14th describes the necessity of organization when ruling a country. Without organization, a kingdom is vulnerable and its fall is imamate. With one absolute ruler, nothing is discussed nor fought over. As Louis 14th described, “The interest of the state…

    • 402 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Chapter 13 DBQ

    • 311 Words
    • 1 Page

    Write a short paragraph that summarizes the opinions of the pro-absolutist group of documents. Pro-absolutist believe the king should have no limits to his power and all the focus of the monarchy revolves around him. “His qualities are incomparable.” The king doesn’t need Parliament consent to make or declare a law. All the respect and honor goes to him alone; he was like a hero figure.…

    • 311 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Notting Hill Riots Vedant Singh September 6, 1958 The event and the trigger The Aftermath ­ The sentencing of the nine white youths arrested during the riots has passed into judicial lore as an example of "exemplary sentencing" – a harsh punishment to act as a deterrent to others. Each of the youths received five years in prison and they were to also pay £500. Another, entirely unrelated, riot occurred many…

    • 194 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Louis Xiv Dbq Analysis

    • 1168 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In 17th-18th century Europe, the age of absolutism, absolute monarchs ruled most of Europe in countries such as Prussia, France, and the Holy Roman Empire. Absolute monarchs are rulers that have complete control over the government and its people. They claimed to rule by “divine right,” where their authority comes from God and they were above the law. The views of being a proper role as an absolute monarch differed very much between rulers and their subjects. Certain rulers had ideas that both the people and ruler should be united, some abused their power with no sympathy towards the people they rule, and the subjects that suffered from the rulings of the monarch had a completely different perspective than the rulers that were in power.…

    • 1168 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Experience of France and England in the 17th century demonstrates the intellectual and practical superiority of absolutism over constitutionalism. Absolutism in France was much more secure than Constitutionalism in England. Absolutism controlled all competing interest groups and organized all religious sects. Louis XIV had centralized power and control under his authority in France while Constitutionalism in England failed to create absolute monarchy. Constitutionalism in England dealt with James I, Charles I, and James II that led to a catastrophe.…

    • 718 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The events and sentiments that ran through 17th century England were perhaps as paradoxical as Charles the 1st’s head being sewn back to his body after his execution. This era saw a polarization of thought, action and outcome in regards to several events, people and institutions. The height of this polarization existed between the monarchy and the parliament, as questions arose in regards to the extent of power the king could wield, and the extent of power Parliament was willing to allow the king to wield. The two ends of the power spectrum were absolute monarchy , which gave the king unlimited powers, or “royal prerogatives” according to the Stuarts due to their “divine right” to exercise it, and the other a constitutional monarchy , where…

    • 823 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Absolute Monarchs

    • 747 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The three absolute monarchs that are being compared are Philip II of Spain, Queen Elizabeth I of England, and Louis XIV of France. There are many things that are similar and many that are different in their rules. It is valuable to find parallels in their rules and compare mistakes and successes made every one of these monarchs in the three most important areas of government. The three areas of rule that are being specifically looked at are their foreign policy, their religious policy, and the economic concerns and decisions of their respective rules. Each one of these areas are intertwined and effect each other largely so looking for similarities is imperative for learning.…

    • 747 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Why Did the Civil War Begin?

    • 2630 Words
    • 11 Pages

    On 22 August 1642, King Charles I raised his battle standard and declared a civil war against his enemies in Parliament.…

    • 2630 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    European History Outline

    • 333 Words
    • 2 Pages

    c. In Britain kings were forced to have more representative power and moved toward constitutionalism.…

    • 333 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The idea of a single person holding dominion over all others to form an independent state is the driving force in state consolidation in 17th century Europe. Political development in this concept led to different methods of operating a government two prominent models being absolutism and constitutionalism. The first one centers on a strong centralized monarchy and the dominating royal power and the latter is based on a limited monarchy where the ruler is confined to the law and parliament. Theoretically, England planned to follow the constitutional model but the Stuart monarchs thought otherwise of this and conflicted with the Parliament throughout the century. This conflict centers on the evolution of England to becoming a world power.…

    • 717 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    During the late 1400s and 1500s, many rulers took great measures to centralize political power and place it in their own hands. This lead to the occurrence of absolute monarchies, some of which I thought were overall very effective. In absolute monarchies, theoretically the monarch is all-powerful, with no legal limitations to his or her authority. Absolutism in Europe was characteristically justified by the doctrine of divine right, according to which the monarch reigns all-powerfully by the will of God. The intention of absolute monarchs is to utilize his or her power in an effective, better-organized way, despite its weaknesses or negative consequences; and from my perspective, I would have to say that the three most effective rulers ever are King Louis XIV, Frederick the Great, and Peter the Great.…

    • 1239 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    1. King Louis XIV is definitely the perfect example of an absolute monarch. An absolute monarch is a ruler that possesses all of the power and Louis XIV was the most powerful king in all of French history. He took away power from nobility while also giving power to government agents with whom he checked in regularly with. This was a way to guarantee that he would not lose his own power. He did not have to take orders from anyone. He also believed that he and the state were the same, meaning that Louis XIV had total control over how France was governed.…

    • 246 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    * Owned plantation, owned slaves and did not let all of them go, some say he raped some of his slaves, married to Martha Dandridge Custis.…

    • 1586 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays