'Nazi Consolidation of Power in 1933 Was Primarily Due to the Use of Terror and Violence.' How Far Do You Agree with This Judgement?

Topics: Adolf Hitler, Nazi Germany, Paul von Hindenburg Pages: 7 (2716 words) Published: March 23, 2012
'Nazi consolidation of power in 1933 was primarily due to the use of terror and violence.' How far do you agree with this judgement?

The potential limits to Hitler's power were considerable. it must be remembered that Hitler was appointed as chancellor of the Weimar republic and as leader of a cross-party cabinet that included only three Nazis: Hitler as chancellor, Wilhelm frick as minister for the interior and hermann goring as minister without portfolio. the vice-chancellor was to be Franz von papen and other parties of the right were well represented. Hugenburg of the DNVP was put in charge of the Economics Ministry and Franz Seldte of the stalhelm was made minister of Labor. The establishment that had brought Hitler to power held the reins of power and did not expect to lose control. the most powerful politician in Germany in 1933 was president Hindenburg, and Hitler had to work with a number of powerful establishment figures from the newly appointed vice-chancellor von papen to the soon to be president of the reichsbank and economics minister hjalmar Schacht. Behind von Hindenburg's power was not just his prestige as president but the army, which, although still at the size set by the Versailles agreement, was highly influential. the new chancellor's scope for action was also constrained by the power of institutions from the Reichstag to local government. the civil service, churches and press all stood as potential barriers to the nazification of the political system. Hitler's sworn ideological enemies on the left wielded considerable power through the trade unions. in many urban areas, such as Berlin, the Nazi vote in the general election in November 1932 was as low as 22.5 per cent (as opposed to a national figure of 33.1 per cent). just as the Nazis had risen from obscurity to power on the back of considerable discontent with the political system's inability to deal with Germany's economic problems, so the Nazis now had to deliver (or at least be seen delivering). As with nearly all governments, Hitler's regime would be primarily judged on the state of the economy. for many within Germany's politically important middle class, the violence and thuggery of elements of the Nazi movement was of deep concern. For the Hilarity regime to establish broad political consensus, it needed to be perceived to be legitimate., law-abiding and respectable. so the obstacles to the creation of a Nazi dictatorship were many, and, on first inspection, seemingly insurmountable. Even from within the Nazi movement, Hitler faced pressure from the SA and radicals to implement the Nazi revolution. Enduring obstacles

Despite these significant obstacles, the Nazi regime had, to a considerable le extent, consolidated power by the end of 1933. There were a number of reasons: There were high levels of collaboration of individuals and institutions with the regime because there were aspects of that government that they recognised and supported. This will be studied in greater detail in the next unit. The Nazis deployed propaganda effectively as a means of deceiving the political nation and beyond both of their real intentions and the significance of their actions. They managed to use terror and violence with efficient ruthlessness. The use of violence was balanced by the attempt by the attempt to ensure that the consolidation of power had the veneer of legality. the Nazi leaders were pragmatic ion their understanding that their revolution had to be achieved by legal means for it to be acceptable to the vast majority of the German population. Those who believed that they had 'tamed' Hitler and his movement were to be proved very much mistaken. Although his 'Appeal to the German People' broadcast on 1st February was conservative in nature, the Sa began to wreak revenge on the enemies of National Socialism. A decree in Prussia (which had fallen under the jurisdiction of Reich Commissioner Goering) 21 days later resulted in the police being...
Continue Reading

Please join StudyMode to read the full document

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • ‘Nazi Consolidation of Power in 1933 Was Primarily Due to the Use of Terror and Violence.’ How Far Do You Agree with This Judgement? Essay
  • Nazi Consolidation of Power in 1933 Was Primarily Due to the Use of Terror and Violance.' How Far Do You Agree with This Judgement? Essay
  • 'Nazi consolidation of power in 1933 was primarily due to the use of terror and violence.' How far do you agree with this statement? Essay
  • How Important Was the Use of Legislation in the Nazi Consolidation of Power by the End of 1933? Essay
  • Consolidation of Nazi Power 1933-1934 Essay
  • How Far Do You Agree Hitler Became Chancellor of Germany in January 1933 Primarily Due to the Electoral Success of the Nazi Party Research...
  • `Hitler Became Chancellor in January 1933 Because He Was Leader of the Most Popular Party in Germany. ` How Far Do You Agree with This...
  • 'The transformation in the fortunes of the Nazi part in the years 1930-1933 was largely because of Hitler's talents as a politician' how far...

Become a StudyMode Member

Sign Up - It's Free