Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

The Provisional Government

Good Essays
475 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Provisional Government
The Provisional Government
Background
the provisional government is the name give to the government that led Russia from March 1917 to November 1917.
Throughout its existence, the provisional government met at the Tauride Palace.
By July it was led by Alexander Kerensky.
The provisional government had one major disadvantage it's leaders, especially Kerensky were associated with the middle class.
They were not seen as having anything in common with the working class, therefore,how could they possibly represent them.

Mistakes
The provisional government also committed two huge blunders:
It refused to give land to the poor peasants in the rural areas.
This seemed to confirm the point above- that the provisional government did not understand the desires of the poor. To survive the peasants needed land and this was refused by Kerensky.
By far the biggest blunder was the decision taken by the provisional government to keep Russia in World War One.
This was a curious decision as the war was hated by the Russian people who had suffered greatly as a result of it.

Lenin's Return
Lenin returned to Russia on April 3rd 1917.
The Germans had helped him return so he could seize power and make peace.
This was a very long route from Switzerland, through Germany, into Sweden, Finland then finally Petrograd.
He made a famous speech when he arrived which became known as the April Thesis.

April Thesis
It's main demands were:
Power should be transferred to the soviets.
The war should be brought to an immediate end.
All land should be taken over by the state and relocated by local soviets.
These demands became known as PEACE, LAND and BREAD.

Reaction
The initial reaction was mixed.
The Bolsheviks were still a minority among socialists, numbering only 26,000 members.
The Bolsheviks were divided as to whether to help the provisional government or not.
Some felt Lenin had grown out of touch and that he was too radical.
There were allegations, with some element of truth, that Lenin was in the pay of the Germans.

Longer Term
Bit by bit Lenin won over people with his speeches.
The peasants did not seize land because Lenin told them too, they were already doing it.
By the end of April, Lenin had won over the majority of the Bolshevik Central Committee.
This meant that the Bolshevik policy would now to be opposed to the provisional government.

Challenges to its Authority the provisional government had to overcome two challenges to its authority. One was called the July Days and the other was the Kornilov Affair.

Why the Bolsheviks would work with the Provisional Government?
To try and bring down the Duma from the inside. Also because it was very unlikely that a revolution would occur in the same year.

Why won't they work with them?
They don't have the same aims and Lenin wanted to rule not to follow.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The Industrial revolution(1780's) created new technology, bringing wealth and prosperity to the country. However, it also took jobs away from artisans and other skilled workers, leaving them unemployed and resentful. The rapid expansion of the Industrial revolution (1780's) also saw many changes occur in the growth of middle class awareness. With the increase in their wealth and education the middle classes felt that they were poorly represented in parliament as they believed that their status in society should have given them more rights. Previously the affairs of parliament had been the priority of the land owners and aristocracy. They took advantage of the pre-dated and corrupt electoral system to maintain their dominance in politics. Through the use of 'rotten boroughs' and other 'under hand' tactics they ensured that the control of the country remained with them. However, with the advent of the industrial revolution middle class society began to question this previously accepted political structure. They believed that they should have a greater role to play in deciding the political future of the country.…

    • 775 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    APW CCOT Soviet Union

    • 1392 Words
    • 2 Pages

    losses in the Russo­Japanese War, and the Crimean War, the Soviet Union began reordering their…

    • 1392 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The reforms and policies made during the last Tsarist years were not in the interests of the people but were made simply to maintain the power of the Tsar and his nobles. Most people would argue that during the years 1917-1964 there was more political freedom and less repression than in the Tsarist years. The provisional government did not meet the needs of the Russian people. They were an unstable and temporary government, and many people on the furthest parts of the Russian empire did not know about their existence. This provided them with many issues, such as trying to enforce democracy onto people they did not understand what democracy actually was. Many historians believe that at this point the people of Russia did not know themselves what form of government they wanted and due to the lack of education they did not know what form was best for them. In October 1917 came the Bolshevik revolutions. With their leader, Lenin, the Bolsheviks overthrew the provisional government and came into power. The leadership of Lenin was met with great approval from the people. Lenin promised political freedom unknown to them under the Tsars and Provisional government. In his rule…

    • 1370 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Historians may believe the Provisional Government was doomed because of a major problem with the provisional government which was the Dual Authority. The Provisional Government was made up of members of the old Duma that had refused to disband at the Tsars command. This meant that they were basically the same men that the Tsar had appointed before the revolution, so nothing had changed in that regard. Consequently, they had no goodwill from the public backing them up, so they would be judged purely on what the public could see happening. Furthermore, the Government had to share power with the Petrograd Soviet. This illegitimate relationship lessened the power of the Provisional Government existentially. Incidentally, it should be mentioned that the two factions were not necessarily hostile towards one another from the start, with some members being members of both groups at the same time. This combination of convenience however, could not last for long.Without a shred of a doubt, one of the biggest problems with the Provisional Government was the continuation of the war. The war was a lost cause by this stage and the Provisional Government would have wanted to pull out if it were a logical possibility, but in order to keep Russia afloat they needed to keep up the fight for the money that they were receiving from Britain and France. The loans that Russia had taken out from these countries while under the Tsarist regime had left Russia financially destroyed. The injections of money and supplies that the allies were providing Russia with because of their involvement in the war was the only thing keeping Russia stable. If Russia could have started to engage in peace talks, as suggested by Josef Stalin, then the Provisional Government could concentrate on sorting out the social and economic problems properly, but because of the desperate need for the war credits, this was not a viable solution. The effect of this choice to keep fighting is somewhat akin to watching a…

    • 915 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    27

    • 610 Words
    • 4 Pages

    political power of the wealthy was at stake. So the tsar gave theses serfs no political…

    • 610 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The first of these was headed by a moderate liberal, Georgi Lvov and the second was ran by Alexander Krensky. The Provisional Government knew that the Bolsheviks were going to strike. The reports of the Bolshevik's conspiracy in where always in Krensky's mind, but there was overwhelming dissent about the revolution. The government was so unstable that Krensky had little to no control over the congress or military, and because Krensky did not have "the majesty of government, the laws, the protection of friends and of the state," he had no power, no control over his fortune. Krensky's failure as a prince had to do with the unstable government and the political factions all brewing their revolutions and civil unrest. He did not prepare for fortune. He met his end by not being able to deal with…

    • 1377 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Socialists had support from lower classes and political left with the Provisional Government holding state power leading to a period of dual power ensuing…

    • 1287 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 1914 Germany and Austria declared war on Russia and their allies Serbia. Despite the fact that in 1908 Tsar Nicholas II had put into action ‘The Grand Military Programme’, aiming to rearm his forces and get Russia ready for war, the plan was set to finish in 1917, not three years earlier. Nevertheless, Russia went into war with its head held high, with full support and enthusiasm from the Russian people. By 1916 however, this support for the war had changed dramatically, as the fighting at the front had lived up to nobody’s expectations. Russia was now occupied by the enemy, proving the weakness of the Russian’s defence and the strength of the enemy. On the front line one out of three men had a rifle, due to the lack of weapons and supplies the incomplete military programme had been able to offer. The number of casualties, missing in action and death toll was catastrophic: 4 million by the end of 1915. Evidently moral of the men fighting was almost at breaking point, it was clear Russia was losing a battle they did not even want to fight. Another affecting factor on the front line was the fact that most of the…

    • 1389 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the USSR at the time of Lenin’s death there was no voting system for power. Although the Communists were the party destined to lead the USSR and there was no dangerous rival for their authority, the…

    • 813 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In addition, Russia had endured many more hardships and downfalls following the conclusion of World War I. According to The Making of the West, “the government’s incompetence and Nicholas II’s stubborn resistance to change had made the war even worse in Russia than elsewhere” (Hunt et al. 683). The. In the early revolution in February, the monarchy was overthrown and a provisional government was put into place, however it failed to meet all the desires of the working class and…

    • 832 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The war had an adverse effect on the Russian economy. The rising cost of food caused food shortages. Industrial workers went on strike to increase wages and by the end of the war and a new government emerged following Nicholas II abdication. The already delicate domestic political situation in Russia would be imperiled by Nicholas II’s personal affiliation with the military wealth of his country. Any other military commander could be blamed for a disaster and then dismissed, but by taking personal command the Emperor would now take personal as well as political responsibility for all military failures. The crumbling of the Russian position in the field after he assumed command made such an outcome inevitable regardless of innumerable…

    • 1728 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In addition to the huge casualties, food supplies ran short and prices rose by 150%. People became dissatisfied as the war dragged out, and they felt it wasn't worth the cost and human suffering. Once again, the leadership of the Tsar came into question by the…

    • 2089 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Russia had lost a lot of territory to Germany and Austria. Generals and the higher class were not reliable in the military and were completely incompetent. There were food riots all over Russia and the troops refused to listen to their superiors. The March Revolution was one of the three revolutions that Russia had during this time period. The Tsar Nicholas the second removed himself from the throne. The Duma, or Parliament of Russia were ignored and held no power up until this point. They took over the government and called themselves the Provisional Government. The Provisional government was set up to make a Democratic constitution and have free elections. Alexander Kerensky was elected president. He believe that the only way to end the war was to have a victorious peaceful ending. The peasants which make up more then half of the population wanted the war to end whether it was victorious or not. They were sick of loosing their sons and stated that they refused to grow crops and make goods as long as the war was still going on. Lenin was the leader of the Bolsheviks, which had about 100,000 members out of the 160 million people in Russia. He went head to head against Kerensky over power and leadership of Russia. In October Lenin got his group together and convinced them to take control of the government. He eventually took over and created the Bolshevik Dictatorship, using military force. The differences of…

    • 1421 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    The largest factor in this public unrest was the Provisional Government’s insistence that Russia should continue fighting in the First World War. Millions of Russians had been killed, a large percentage of them ‘peasants in uniform’ – farmers who were untrained and unprepared for what awaited them. With so many farmers fighting or already dead, coupled with severe inflation due to lack of government control of the economy, huge food shortages swept across Russia.…

    • 1594 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    independence from britain

    • 2136 Words
    • 7 Pages

    believed that they had not been represented in Parliament and argued that they should not be…

    • 2136 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays