Source: The Americas, Vol. 60, No. 4 (Apr., 2004), pp. 519-558 Published by: Academy of American Franciscan History
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/4144490 .
Accessed: 02/08/2011 11:59
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use, available at . http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp. JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use provides, in part, that unless you have obtained prior permission, you may not download an entire issue of a journal or multiple copies of articles, and you may use content in the JSTOR archive only for your personal, non-commercial use. Please contact the publisher regarding any further use of this work. Publisher contact information may be obtained at . http://www.jstor.org/action/showPublisher?publisherCode=aafh. . Each copy of any part of a JSTOR transmission must contain the same copyright notice that appears on the screen or printed page of such transmission.
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact firstname.lastname@example.org.
Academy of American Franciscan History is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to The Americas.
60:4 April 2004, 519-558
Copyrightby the Academy of American
BOURBON REFORMERS ND THE
MERCHANTSOF LIMA, 1765-1796
After Spain'sdefeatin the SevenYears'War(1757-1763),whenthe
Britishhad occupied Havanaand Manila,a series of territorial, omc mercial, and tax reformsbroughtsignificantchange to the viceroyalty of Peru.Theireconomic effects have been mattersfor debateever since. Some historianshave emphasizedtheir positive effects. Following promulgation of the Reglamentode comerciolibre of 1778, the volume and value of m
European anufactures xportedto the Pacific coast of SpanishSouthAmere ica increased.Lima and its portcity, Callao, remainedimportant s commera cial centersof SpanishSouthAmerica.'But otherssuggest thatthe viceregal capital-home to a powerfulmercantileelite, the magnatesof the consulado (merchant uild) of Lima-suffered a decline in its economic fortunes,as did g
the entireviceroyalty.2 upportfor this point of view was widespreadin late S
colonial Peru. In spite of the evidence for growth, a rising chorus of complaint bemoaned the increasing poverty of the viceroyalty in general and Lima in particular. ow can we accountfor this discrepancy?
The answer is to be found in the structure f commercialreformin Peru. o
It is clear that the Bourbonreformersattemptedto diminish the wealth and power of the limehiocommercial elite-close-knit family networks constructed during the first half of the century3-that had interposed itself ' John R.
Fisher, CommercialRelations between Spain and Spanish America in the Era of Free Trade, 1778-1796 (Liverpool:Centre for Latin American Studies, The University of Liverpool MonographSeries No. 13, 1985), pp. 16-46, and Fisher,"TheEffects of ComercioLibreon the Economies of New Granadaand Peru:A Comparison," eformand Insurrectionin BourbonNew Granadaand Peru, R
ed. John R. Fisher,Allan J. Kuethe,andAnthony McFarlane(Baton Rouge and London:LouisianaState University Press, 1990), pp. 150-151.
Timothy E. Anna, The Fall of the Royal Governmentin Peru (Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 1980), p. 14, believes that the perceptionof "the weakness of Peru's economy before the independence era"was accurate. 3 Jestis Turiso Sebastiin, Comerciantesespaiioles en la Lima borbdnica:Anatomiade una dlite de poder 1701-1761 (Valladolid:Universidadde...