Research Methodolgy

Only available on StudyMode
  • Download(s) : 170
  • Published : August 4, 2012
Open Document
Text Preview
Portfolio of Evidence HMEMS80 Assessment sheet
Name and Surname: _________________________________________________ Student number: _____________________________________

GENERAL COMMENTS:

Aspects 1.

Marks

Structure and Presentation Cover page completed fully Declaration of Authenticity completed Checklist completed and included

______/4 __/1 __/2 __/1 ______10 _______/5 Good Average 2-3: ____ Weak 0-1: ____

2.1

Reflection on formative assessment Reflection on learning in Assignment 1

Evidence of what has been learnt in Assignment 1 Reflection on learning in Assignment 2

4-5: ____

_______/5 Good Average 2-3: ____ Weak 0-1: ____

Evidence of what has been learnt in Assignment 2
2.2

4-5: ____

Weekly self-evaluations Three weeks’ complete selfreflections are presented and a current reflection is included for Less than three weeks’ self-

_______/ 6 No weeks’ selfreflections or

Evidence of self-reflection submitted weekly

reflections are incomplete presented and not all includes a selfreflections are listed and

Assessment sheet: Portfolio of Evidence HMEMS80 2012

Page 1

each week’s qualitative questions

current reflection for each week as well.

no or incomplete current reflections for each week are provided.

5-6
2.3

3-4

0-2 _______/5

Reflection on value of research Good Average Only some of the three aspects have been

Weak Little evidence provided AND/OR some general aspects mentioned OR no reflection provided OR no credible references included

Evidence of reflection on the value of research.

All three aspects have been addressed

thoroughly with addressed or credible references included some aspects have not been addressed thoroughly. Few credible references have been included

4-5 3 Title Title of the proposal
Title is concise and clear and reflects the content of the study accurately.

2-3

0-1 _________/55 _______/3

Research Proposal Task

Title is somewhat brief or somewhat longwinded AND/OR The title only reflects some elements of the

Title is not clearly formulated, either too brief or too longwinded. AND/OR Page 2

Assessment sheet: Portfolio of Evidence HMEMS80 2012

study.

Title does not accurately reflect the content of the study.

3

2

0-1

Literature review Background to the topic
The background to the topic clearly describes the broader theme of the research. The background to the topic is somewhat brief or somewhat vague or not clearly related to the topic of study 3 1-2 Some variables are clearly defined from literature, but not all the variables of the study OR The variables are vaguely defined 3 1-2 Some previous studies are mentioned or listed, but the results thereof are not integrated into a coherent argument. AND/OR Only internationally or nationally studies are mentioned. 0 0

________/15
The background is not related to the topic of study OR No background is provided

Defining the variables

All variables that are involved in the study are clearly defined from literature

The variables are not defined from literature.

Describing previous research

The results of the most pertinent studies in the field (both internationally and nationally) have been integrated into a coherent discussion, taking corresponding and contradictory viewpoints into account. 3

Irrelevant previous research are mentioned OR No previous research are mentioned.

1-2 Only 2 to 4 of the prescribed articles have been used in the literature review. 1-2 One additional article have been included in

0 Only 1 or none of the prescribed articles have been used in the literature review. 0 No additional articles have been included in

Use of prescribed articles

All 5 prescribed articles have been used in the literature review. 3

Use of additional articles

Two or more additional articles

Assessment sheet: Portfolio of Evidence HMEMS80 2012

Page 3

have been included in the literature...
tracking img