Preview

Reaction to “Shakespeare in the Bush”

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
323 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Reaction to “Shakespeare in the Bush”
“Shakespeare in the Bush” is an interesting article. When I saw the title and the first paragraph, I thought that the article is going to tell something that people do not commonly know about Shakespeare and his creations. But when I read to the middle of the article, I realized that it is something about the impact of culture on interpreting a story. At the beginning, the author argues that there should be a general understanding of typical tragedies despite of one’s cultural background. And was hoping to prove this by the West Africa’s Tiv’s interpretation of Hamlet – which he thought should be similar to his – when he tells it to them. However, those tribe people interpreted Hamlet in a totally different way because of their own culture, values, and belief. And it proved the author’s friend’s point that Americans have difficulty with Shakespeare, just like the Tiv.

It is a shame that I have not read any Shakespeare’s master piece. And it is natural for someone to relate everything to their own culture, as their culture is the only thing they came along with, and the only thing they can rely on when judging something. A culture is something deeply in any civilization, which will never be totally understood by foreigners even if they already live in that culture for many years. In fact, culture is never meant to be understood, it is just a natural thing that come along with everyone. So I do not think when I read Shakespeare’s plots, even if I am aware of the differences on culture and time between me and people in Shakespeare’s time, I will come with a full agreement on the interpretations of Shakespeare. However, I think there is no right or wrong interpretation on anything, as everyone is different, and has their own way to judge things. No matter how you interpret Shakespeare, his great stories will always have impact on

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    In the light of my critical study, the statement that "Shakespeare's Hamlet continues to engage audiences through its dramatic treatment of struggle and disillusionment" resonates strongly with my own interpretation of Shakespeare's play, Hamlet. It clearly continues to engage audiences as it presents ideas of duty and corruption. Shakespeare presents these ideas largely through the protagonist, Hamlet's, struggle with his duty to his father and his disillusionment with himself and the corrupt society in which he lives.…

    • 1139 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Laura Bohannan recalls telling the story of Hamlet to elders of the Tiv tribe in West Africa. As she tells the story to the elders, they often refute her interpretation and insist that their own interpretation is correct. An elder even says, “We, who are elders, will instruct you in their true meaning…” Bohannan’s Pick from the Past shows how cultures can interpret works of literature in different and unexpected ways. For example, the elders offer an unusual claim that Laertes killed his sister, Ophelia, hoping to profit from selling her body. Although the elders have unconventional interpretations, the lens of the Tiv people give an unprecedented and unique way to understand a work of literature.…

    • 116 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hamlet Essay

    • 948 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Shakespeare composed Hamlet as a representation of the conflict inherent in issues surrounding life and death and the many reinterpretations of the text attest to Catherine Belsey’s theory of the ‘myth of an unchanging human nature’. Modern interpretations of Hamlet such as Kenneth Branagh’s 1996 film use the medium of film and existential issues to create new meaning from Shakespeare’s original text.…

    • 948 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Shakespeare's is one of the most read writers ever and his writing was so successful that not just one group of people liked it. He did this by relating to his audience using universal truths. . Human emotions are not something that change over time and they are also known as universal truths; love, hate, revenge, and envy are all examples of universal truths. This play was so successful that many other movies have copied the plot but changed the scenery. Over the past 400 years since this play was written the world has changed drastically, but the emotions and feelings in this play have withstood the test of time. This is why the movies, Romeo and Juliet (1996) and West Side Story (1961) were so successful. Shakespeare's play and the two movies modeled after it have many similarities and many differences, but one thing remains constant in all of them, They all use universal truths to relate to their audiences.…

    • 739 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    West Side Story, Gnomeo and Juliet, Lion King and She’s the Man are just a few of the adaptions made in the image of Shakespeare’s critically acclaimed plays. Shakespeare’s tragedies have acquired critical respect from literary enthusiasts all across the globe, yet many people believe that Shakespeare’s comedies are unworthy of the same respect. However, Shakespeare’s comedies entail the same levels of timelessness and poetic writing as his tragedies, which means that they deserve the same level of respect as all of his other plays.…

    • 708 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Reading shakespeare in the modern area has proven to be quite a challenge. There have been many websites created for students and other people to understand the text. The old english has lost its touch but the meaning is still the same. Taking a closer look at how shakespeare gets his meaning across one can find many surprising views, such as gender can change the way people view others. This point was widely seen throughout two of Shakespeare's plays. In the plays Henry V and St Joan written by shakespeare both portray gender and class critical lenses and pathos rhetorical strategies.…

    • 593 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Christie sutanto LING 425 Exam1 Set 1. Bohannan in “Shakespeare in the Bush” argues that human nature is not universal and context can be understood differently depending on cultural backgrounds or individual experience. Why did the author initially expect Hamlet to be universal and why did it turn out not to be universal as she thought? How did these different patterns of interethnic communication lead to miscommunication and mistranslation?…

    • 1846 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Any critical evaluation of the play “Hamlet” must be chiefly concerned with the character of Hamlet. Unlike Shakespeare’s other tragedies, “Hamlet” is singular in purpose and scope-it is the story of one man’s personal and moral collapse under the weight of his own (and other’s) decisions, intentions and machinations. The play is not complicated with subplots and extraneous secondary characters, but is wholly focused on the man himself. This dedication to a singular dramatic intention paradoxically makes for “Hamlet” to be, subjectively, Shakespeare most confusing play. It is problematic in its protagonists’ inscrutability, his missing motives, his contradictory actions, and his utter implacability to settle into one stable character. Almost everything he does further contradicts him as an individual in the world of the play and as a dramatic character. For this reason my critical evaluation of the play is that it is artistically self defeating due to its own subversions of character and dramatic convention, and this should render it unfulfilling and disappointing as a dramatic performance. Paradoxically, the plays confusion renders it all the more infuriatingly readable-it is both alienating and enticing, a work which defeats itself in its own realisation and at the same time is only worthwhile and meaningful in this artistic enigma-the individual components should not work, yet it does strike a powerful emotional and dramatic resonance in its completion. Many aspects of “Hamlet” as a text are easily criticised-it is certainly a work with a large amount of problems. However, in a rather subversive and mysterious manner the play is a wonderful work of literature.…

    • 1441 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Conflicts are explored and help captivate audiences. The use of Shakespeare’s language also helps to facilitate these themes.…

    • 604 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Hamlet Rhetorical Analysis

    • 1632 Words
    • 7 Pages

    In spite of the fact that the plot evokes the implication that it occurred between the close of 16th century and the start of the 17th century, Shakespeare’s Hamlet surpasses the constraints of time and muses upon both the primitive and contemporary man. In the late 16th century in England, people of all classes on the social echelon, with the exception of royals, were able to publicly eyewitness theatre. Audiences craved new plays to assuage their appetites. One of numerous dramatists that capitalized this abundance of opportunity was Shakespeare. Opposed to the modern time, audiences spectated the play to hear it rather than see it. The articulation of the lines and significance of how the story was recited was crucial…

    • 1632 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    Shakespeare’s works are not limited to expressing the concerns and interests of a narrowly confined historical period. They have in them the…

    • 3051 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    You may be asking, how is a play set in a world of exploration and conquest still significant to a world of flaccid morals and technological advancements? The works of Shakespeare prove ongoing relevance over time through the utilisation of key ideas, characters and language. Through characterisation and the exploration of the notions of jealousy and racism in “Othello”, the guests at the national Shakespeare convention can gain insight on how the works of Shakespeare are as significant now as they ever have been.…

    • 787 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As our classmate, Alisha Jones stated in the last unit discussion post response, “It is amazing how we can all read the same Shakespeare play, and get a different understanding as of the message being conveyed”; but that just speaks volumes to the genius of Shakespeare’s talent as a writer. As for myself, I try to approach Shakespeare’s writing with a more critical thinking mindset, especially with the sensitivity of racial intolerance. As a result, I respectfully listened and considered the viewpoint of those responding to this post. Nevertheless, I would like to offer an opposing point of view.…

    • 460 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Hamlet strips away the veneers and smoke screens that trap our minds, forcing us to confront the raw human condition in all its pain and glory. For this reason, Hamlet has never ceased to enthral audiences since its conception, and has been critically scrutinized for centuries. Shakespeare explores ideas that are universally understood: the human need for vengeance, human glory as well as human failings, and the unavoidable presence of death. Collectively, these ideas compose a deep probing of the human condition. On a personal level, Hamlet has been worthy of my interpretive study because it has provoked me to engage with my surroundings more critically, questioning established values, norms and codes of behaviour that had previously held my conviction.…

    • 1307 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    In the story Shakespeare in the Bush, author Laura Bohannan has an argument with a friend about the interpretation of Shakespeare 's literature. Her friend stated that Shakespeare was "a very English poet" and that people of other cultures could certainly misunderstand his literal meanings. The author then argues that the plots and motivations of Shakespeare 's tragic plays will always be apparent because human nature is more or less universal through out the world. She does however take into account that the customs and translation of his works could produce slight differences in their interpretations. The argument remained a stalemate as she was preparing to travel to Africa. Her friend gave her a copy of Hamlet as a parting gift with hopes that perhaps she would find the true interpretation. On her trip to Africa the author finds out that custom, translations, and culture play a larger role in the interpretation of Shakespeare and that his meanings were not as universal as she previously thought.…

    • 1253 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays