Preview

public interest litigation

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
4872 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
public interest litigation
INTRODUCTION
Public Interest Litigation: The term "Public Interest" means the larger interests of the public, general welfare and interest of the masses ((Oxford English Dictionary 2nd Edn.) Vol.Xll) and the Word “Litigation” means "a legal action including all proceedings therein, initiated in a court of Law with the purpose of enforcing a right or seeking a remedy." Thus, the expression `Public Interest Litigation' means "any litigation conducted for the benefit of public or for removal of some public grievance." In simple words, public interest litigation means. Any public spirited citizen can move/approach the court for the public cause (or public interest or public welfare) by filing a petition in the Supreme Court under Art.32 of the Constitution or in the High Court under Art.226 of the Constitution or before the Court of Magistrate under Sec. 133 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.
In Indian law, public interest litigation means litigation for the protection of the public interest. It is litigation introduced in a court of law, not by the aggrieved party but by the court itself or by any other private party. It is not necessary, for the exercise of the court’s jurisdiction, that the person who is the victim of the violation of his or her right should personally approach the court. Public interest litigation is the power given to the public by courts through judicial activism. However, the person filing the petition must prove to the satisfaction of the court that the petition is being filed for a public interest and not just as a frivolous litigation by a busy body.
The seeds of the concept of public interest litigation were initially sown in India by Krishna Iyer J., In 1976 in Mumbai Kamgar Sabha vs. Abdul Thai (AIR 1976 SC 1455) and was initiated in Akhil Bharatiya Shoshit Karmachari Sangh (Railway) v. Union of India (AIR 1981 SC 298), wherein an Unregistered association of workers was permitted to institute a writ petition under Art.32 of the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Canadian Law Categories

    • 4297 Words
    • 18 Pages

    Public Law: concerned with structure, duties and powers of the government, and relations btw the state and its citizens…

    • 4297 Words
    • 18 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    central political authority is not seen as fair and proper, the litigants will seek personal…

    • 461 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    For the following, it is assumed the preliminary considerations of date and jurisdiction (including extra-territorial) with respect to the Corporate Corruption Act 2013 (NSW) ('the Act') and the $10,000 payment from Country Bank to Remember the Bush coalition are met.…

    • 1029 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Civil Action

    • 331 Words
    • 2 Pages

    a. a lawsuit is a court process at law or in equity to determine the legal merits of a controversy.…

    • 331 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Citizens United Case

    • 1758 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Although corporations are comprised of individuals, it is highly debated if corporations deserve the same rights that the Constitution grants each American citizen. The First Amendment gives each citizen equal opportunity to pursue his or her own ambitions in coalition with their great nation. In the Citizens United v. Federal Election Committee case No. 08-205, the Supreme Court validated the idea of political spending as free speech and abolished the ban on corporate political spending. Corporations are imperative to an industrialized society, but they should not have the right to control political decisions, especially when they are motivated by selfish and monetary reasons. Corporate speech involves individual speech, but it does not have the human voice. The Bill of Rights was drafted to protect the rational freedoms of an actual human voice.…

    • 1758 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Citizens United

    • 997 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Almost a century ago, back to the time when the modern corporation was created, sprung the Progressive era that flourished with political reforms and social activism. Along with the corporations also came laws that have always prohibited or limited the use of corporate money in elections as a result of Progressive reform’s efforts to eliminate social and political problems, especially corruption. These specific laws have been in place up until January 21, 2010 during the landmark case Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, when the Supreme Court ruled with a 5-4 majority that the government may not ban political spending by corporations in candidate elections. As a result, the court also overruled its 1990 case Austin v. Michigan Chamber of Commerce, which upheld restrictions on corporate spending to support or oppose political candidates, and partially overruled the 2003 case McConnell v. Federal Election Commission, which upheld the part of the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act of 2002 that restricted campaign spending by corporations and unions. The case formed when prior to the 2008 primary elections, Citizens United, a nonprofit corporation produced a 90 minute documentary entitled Hillary: The Movie. The movie conveyed opinions about whether Hillary Clinton, a candidate for the Democratic presidential nomination, was fit for the presidency. However, The Movie falls within the definition of "electioneering communications" under the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act of 2002, a federal act designed to prevent "big money" from wrongly influencing federal elections-which, as well as other things, prohibits corporate financing of "electioneering communications" and enforces “mandatory disclosure and disclaimer requirements on such communications.” The District Court for the District of Columbia denied Citizens United's preliminary injunction motion to enjoin the Federal Election Commission ("FEC") from enforcing these provisions of the Bipartisan Campaign…

    • 997 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Many laws and rights exist in the U.S.A. to keep people free and safe in this country. Individual rights exist to give people his or her freedoms, while that same freedom can allow people to take advantage of their freedoms. Freedom is the item that keeps the people of this country happy. People feel secure in what they are doing during their everyday lives. Public order is in place to keep society as a whole safe from misdeeds. Public order is also a system in place that restricts some freedoms that people may want. Freedoms are the ideals in life that everyone can take advantage of no matter who they are.…

    • 1967 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Judicial Activism

    • 282 Words
    • 2 Pages

    There are many differences between Judicial Activism and Judicial Self Restraint. Judicial Activism is the process by which judges take an active role in the governing process and Judicial Self Restraint is that Judges should not read their own philosophies into the constitution.…

    • 282 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Judicial Redress

    • 278 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In view of the operations by the courts on a wider canvas of judicial review, a potent weapon was forged by the Supreme Court by way of public interest litigation (PIL) also known as social action litigation. The Supreme Court has ruled that where judicial redress is sought in respect of a legal injury or a legal wrong suffered by persons, who by reason of their poverty or disability are unable to approach the court for enforcement of their fundamental rights, any member of the public, acting bona fide can maintain an action for judicial redress. Thus, the underprivileged and the downtrodden have secured access to court through the agency of a public-spirited person or organization. This weapon was effectively used by the Supreme Court and…

    • 278 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Public Complaint

    • 797 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The article descript that the officers of the Dallas Police Department feel the special unit’s regular reviews of dash-cam video from patrol cars are being nitpicky with disciplinary action for minor infractions such as speeding. Within the 11 months of operation, the unit reviewed the dash-cam videos and they found numerous examples of officers exceeding the department’s speed requirements, failing to turn on their lights and sirens or failing to stop at stop signs or red lights during chases or when responding to other emergency calls. Many of these violations were against department policy and they were disciplined.…

    • 797 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Public Interest

    • 769 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Flathman, Richard E. (1966). The Public Interest: An Essay Concerning the Normative Discourse of Politics. New York: John Wiley and Sons, Inc.…

    • 769 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Due to the inability of the plaintiff (Roche) to prove its contention, the judgement of the case was based on the grounds of “public interest”…

    • 539 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Euthanasia Of Dogs

    • 6803 Words
    • 17 Pages

    1. The petitioner wants this court to issue a writ of mandamus thereby directing the respondents to take appropriate measures to tackle the rising stray dog menace in the States of Punjab, Haryana as well as Union Territory of Chandigarh. The petitioner had also earlier approached this Court by way of CWP No.3653 of 2012, in the nature of Public Interest Litigation (PIL) for the same relief in which orders dated 27.2.2012 were passed observing that the municipal authorities would take all necessary steps to control this menace. The grievance of the petitioner, however, is that after the said order and despite representation made by him, no steps are taken by the respondent-authorities which has forced him to file present petition, again as PIL. As per the petitioner, provisions of S. 11(3)(b) of the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, 1960 (hereinafter to be referred to "PCA Act") are available to the respondents to take effective steps and action to tackle the menace.…

    • 6803 Words
    • 17 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Public participation is a political principle or practice, and may also be recognized as a right (right to public participation). The terms public participation may be used interchangeably with the concept or practice of stakeholder engagement and/or popular participation. Generally public participation seeks and facilitates the involvement of those potentially affected by or interested in a decision.…

    • 1383 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Food security Bill in India

    • 1935 Words
    • 13 Pages

    • 36 per cent have a body mass index (BMI) below the cut-off of 18.5 commonly…

    • 1935 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays

Related Topics