Preview

Principles of Property Relations Between Husband and Wife under the Family Code

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
962 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Principles of Property Relations Between Husband and Wife under the Family Code
Principles of Property Relations between husband and wife under the family code

Family Code expressly repealed the Civil Code provision

Art. 74: Family Code
1. by marriage settlements executed before the marriage
2. by provisions of this Code
3. by the local custom

the couple before marriage may enter into a marriage settlement that they want:

a) Absolute Separation of Property
b) Absolute Community of Property
c) Conjugal Partnership of Gains or Relative Community of Property
d) Dowry system and others...

If the parties entered into marriage without executing any marriage settlement as in the common practice among Filipino couples, then the SYSTEM OF ABSOLUTE COMMUNITY OF PROPERTY shall govern under the Family Code.

Absolute Community of Property After Aug. 3, 1988
Community - From Wikipedia Communis comes from a combination of the Latin prefix com- (which means "together") and the word munisprobably originally derived from the Etruscan word munis- (meaning "to have the charge of"). the community property shall consist of all the property owned by the spouses at the time of the celebration of the marriage or acquired thereafter (Art. 91)

EXCEPTION:
1. Property acquired during the marriage by gratuitous title by either spouse, and the fruits as well as the income thereof, if any, unless it is expressly provided by the donor, testator or grantor that they shall form part of the community property

2. Property for personal and exclusive use of either spouse. However, jewelry shall form part of the community property;

3. Property acquired before the marriage by either spouse who has legitimate descendants by a former marriage and the fruits as well as the income, if any, of such property. (Art. 92, FC)

Alienation of community property shall be done with the consent of both the spouses. (Art. 145).

Conjugal Partnership of Gains or Relative Community of Property those acquired by onerous title during

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    LRWA carmichael analysis

    • 1136 Words
    • 3 Pages

    To determine whether a person has “possession” of a property the court considers four factors: (1) whether the buyer exercises control over the property adverse to the seller; (2) whether the buyer has an exclusive right to control the property; (3) whether the buyer pays for taxes and improvements, and; (4) whether the both parties publically acknowledges the transfer. Dawson v. Tumlinson, 242 S.W.2d 191 (Tex. 1951); Johnson v. Bridgewater, 140 S.W.2d 282 (Tex. Civ. App. 1940, writ dismissed); Sharp v. Stacy, 535 S.W.2d 345 (Tex. 1976); Thorton v. Central Loan Co., 164 S.W.2d 248 (Tex. Civ. App. 1942, writ refused). The court does not consider who occupies the property. Sharp, 535 S.W.2d at 348. The details of the oral agreement are also not considered. See Dawson, 242 S.W.2d 191; Johnson, 140 S.W.2d 282; Thorton, 164 S.W.2d 248; Id. Every factor is considered, but all of them need not be present. Johnson. Presently, Carmichael paid for taxes and improvements, but each other factor is at issue.…

    • 1136 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    (Cheeseman2013) In the case of Cunningham v. Hastings, Mr. Hastings and Mrs. Cunningham, was an unmarried couple, purchased a home together. Mr. Hastings put $45,000 down payment toward the home out of his pocket. When it came to how the deed established the deed stated Hastings Cunningham as joint tenants with the right of survivorship. The couple occupied the property jointly. When the relationship between the two ended, Mr. Hastings seized sole possession of the property. Mrs. Cunningham filed a complaint seeking partition of the real estate. Based on its determination that the property could not be split, the trial court ordered it to be sold. The trial court further ordered that $45,000 of the sale proceeds be paid to Mr. Hastings to reimburse…

    • 321 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Mr. Barney Case Study

    • 1055 Words
    • 5 Pages

    One of the three legal issues Mr. Barney is facing includes the investment of mountain home that he owns with three of his friends as joint tenants with right of survivorship. A law states that “The interests of the grantees holding property in joint tenancy with right of survivorship shall be deemed to be equal unless otherwise specified in the conveyance” (North Carolina g.s. § 41-2). This explains that when someone is under a joint tenancy with the right of survivorship and during that period if one of the owner dies, the other joint tenants get that owner’s portion in the property regardless of the deceased owner’s will or the rule of interstate succession (Lewis, 2011). In Mr. Barney’s case, one of his friends, Andy dies and his will showed interest of the property which is owned with three friends to his son, Opie. According to the law explained above, Opie is not entitled to become an owner or the partner of this property and therefore, Mr. Barney is not legally liable for the defaulted loan nor can the bank foreclose the property. As…

    • 1055 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    State Intestacy Case Study

    • 3050 Words
    • 13 Pages

    a common law srare ro a community property State. Answer c is incorrecr because community properry may be…

    • 3050 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    California (CA) is a community property state. All property acquired by spouses during marriage is presumptively the spouses’ community property (CP), while all property acquired before marriage or upon divorce or after permanent separation is presumed to be the acquiring spouse’s separate property (SP). In addition all property acquired by a gift, devise, and descent or through inheritance is presumed to be the acquiring spouse’s SP. However, the spouses may change the character of an item of property by an agreement (such as premarital agreement or transmutation).…

    • 1401 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Abandoned House Ebook

    • 4974 Words
    • 20 Pages

    can be real property or personal property. The most FIGURE 5 types are: goods, instruments, chattel paper, documents, accounts, general intangibles, and rental property. Anything attached or expressed as collateral under a Deed, Lien, or other type of Security Agreement. Foreclosure - the way by which one disposes of personal property to receive rights to or possession of collateral Legal Description - A formal description identifying real property including any part subject to an easement or reservation, complete enough that a particular piece of land can be located and identified. It includes metes and bounds, or lot numbers of a recorded plat. Mortgage Deed - A deed that conveys title to property that is given as security (collateral) for the payment of a debt or performance of a duty. Operation of law - The means by which a right or a liability is created for a party regardless of the party’s actual intent. Personal property - Any movable or intangible thing that is subject to ownership and not classified as real property. [Blacks Law 8th] See the definition of collateral Real Property - Land and anything growing on, attached to, or erected on it, excluding anything that may be severed without injury to the land. [Blacks law 8th] Houses and real-estate are classified as real property Security Agreement - An agreement that creates or provides for an interest in…

    • 4974 Words
    • 20 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Trobrianders

    • 2920 Words
    • 12 Pages

    All these things are directly related to social relationship of the individuals in the society. Take a couple who eats yams together to announce their marriage, they are directly linking yams, which is property, to marriage. Same goes for the food that the groom’s mother provides for a year after marriage, and the exchange that occurs during the marriage. “In marriage exchanges, each person from the bride’s side who contributed to the first yam exchange receives a valuable when they are collected by the groom’s…

    • 2920 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    De facto relationships are state law so are therefore different in each state. In New South Wales, the main law that deals with the break-ups of a de facto relationship is the Property (Relationships) Act, 1984 (NSW).…

    • 1519 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Chapter 4

    • 428 Words
    • 2 Pages

    e) Transfer serve to legitimate the marriage and acknowledge that a transfer of rights has taken place between the different groups.…

    • 428 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Last Will and Testimate

    • 542 Words
    • 3 Pages

    I give the portion of our community property which I own, consisting of household furnishings, clothing, jewelry, books, and personal effects of every kind used about my home or person to my wife, Susan Olivia Smith, to do with as she sees fit, if she survives me; if she does not survive me, to my children that survive me in shares of substantially equal value, per stirpes.…

    • 542 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Fault-Based Divorce

    • 462 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Marital property consists of property that the spouses acquire individually or jointly during the course of marriage. Separate property constitutes any property that one spouse purchased and possessed prior to the marriage and that did not substantially change in value during the course of the marriage because of the efforts of one or both spouses. Under modern divorce laws, separate property is returned to its original owner, while marital property is divided according to negotiated settlement and what the court deems…

    • 462 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Big Government Does Well

    • 718 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Um… What property are we talking about here? Because as far as I know, the government…

    • 718 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    FACTS: The parties were married on March 1, 1959. Plaintiff had a 15 year old daughter by a previous marriage. It was planned that she would live with them, as well as agreed upon that after marriage the defendant’s mother from Hungary would be moved in with them (September 11, 1964). Defendant testified that he would not have married plaintiff if his mother could not live with them. Within a very short time after the arrival of the mother-in-law, the incompatibility between her and the plaintiff caused a disintegration of the marriage. After a psychologist and counselor were called upon, the plaintiff gave the defendant an ultimatum of living with her or his mother and the defendant chose his mother. Plaintiff moved out with daughters on July 9, 1965. Both plaintiff and defendant said they would take the other back upon submission of the other’s stance. Plaintiff sued her husband for maintenance and support for herself and the infant child of their marriage. The Chancery Division entered judgment for defendant. Plaintiff appealed.…

    • 404 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Week 5 Homework

    • 391 Words
    • 2 Pages

    1. At what point does marriage give a spouse the right to enter the property of his or her marriage partner?…

    • 391 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Facts. Plaintiff and defendant lived together for seven years without marrying, with all property acquired during this time taken in defendant’s name. Plaintiff avers that she and defendant entered into an oral agreement where the parties would combine their efforts and earnings and share equally all property accumulated as a result of their efforts. Plaintiff agreed to give up a lucrative career as a singer and entertainer and assume the role of homemaker, with defendant agreeing to provide for all of plaintiff’s financial support. Defendant compelled plaintiff to leave his household in May of 1970, and continued to provide support to her until November of 1971. Thereafter, he refused to provide further support. Plaintiff brought suit to enforce the oral agreement, claiming that she was entitled to half the property and to support payments. The trial court granted judgment on the pleadings for the defendant.…

    • 600 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics