Preview

Parliamentary Sovereignty

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
659 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Parliamentary Sovereignty
DIFFERENCE BETWEEN POLITICAL AND LEGAL SOVEREIGNTY * Political Sovereignty – lies with the people * Legal Sovereignty – vested in parliament * AV Dicey – the people hold political sovereignty and legal sovereignty is with the Queen in Parliament. * With a written constitution the constitution defines the limits of the government’s power * UK powers of the government - while dependent on the electoral mandate – is unconstrained by any fundamental document and subject to Parliament’s approval. * All law making power is derived from the sovereignty of the legislature: Parliament

ORIGINS OF PARLIAMENTARY SOVEREIGNTY * 17th century – Crown and Parliament was in conflict * Crown ruled through royal prerogative rather that ruling through Parliament * Abuse of the prerogative by Charles I lead to civil war and Charles execution * Republican ruled for a decade under Oliver Cromwell * The monarchy was restored in 1660 * Conflicts followed over religion with James II placing RC in office * 1688 revolution – James II fled to France – Williams of Orange and his wife Mary assumed Crown * Long conflict ended * Williams and Mary came to the throne subject to conditions which ensured that Parliament had ultimate sovereignty and that the royal prerogative was subject to that supremacy * The Bill of Rights 1689, the settlement between the Crown and Parliament ensured Parliament Sovereignty
DISCUSS THE MEANING AND SCOPE OF PARLIAMENTARY SOVEREIGNTY * The key to understanding Parliamentary Sovereignty lies in its acceptance by Judges who uphold Parliament Sovereignty * Sovereignty is a fundamental rule of the common law * As long as Judges accept the sovereignty of Parliament it would remain the ultimate rule of the constitution * The sovereignty of Parliament would only be lost under two conditions 1. If Parliament decided to abolish its sovereignty and place it under a written

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Parliament never desired a position where they could control England with full-fledged power. They simply wanted enough limitations on the king’s power that would guarantee the people certain rights that the king cannot take away, which juxtaposes the belief of divine right. Parliament tried numerous ways to create a structured administration where the king’s power was restricted and Parliament, including the people that they represented, was given a voice in government but their countless tries were futile and a disappointment. Preceding the Civil War and many times after it, Parliament tried to approach the king to present to him their ideas of how power should be distributed and used. They came up with laws and regulations to resolve political problems with the king, such as the Petition of Rights, Nineteen Propositions, and Grand Remonstrance. The king declined to acknowledge these laws as genuine laws. He either signed and disregarded it or he absolutely refused to bother himself with the minor complaints of Parliament. This eventually led to the conclusion that King Charles I was the type of man who could not be trusted with the legal promises he made to his people. The worries of Parliament were not seen as a major concern of his and he repudiated to consider any negotiations with whatever Parliament had to say. The king’s intractable ways caused Parliament to break away from his power before England became a place of political disaster.…

    • 729 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Furthermore, the freedom of the judiciary brach to set precedents equal in importance to the law, especially on the controversial issues mentioned in the C.C.R.F., actually diminishes Canada’s democratic nature. Because they are not elected, judges do not have to be sensitive to the will of the…

    • 637 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    His/115 Clash of Cultures

    • 655 Words
    • 3 Pages

    | |protected their citizens and that |were based on common law to do |Governors and elected Colonial |by the crown, and an assembly or |protected their citizens and that |…

    • 655 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Before evaluating whether or not Parliament is sovereign, it’s important to define what sovereignty means. Sovereignty can be split into two; political and legal. Legal sovereignty is the ultimate power to make laws which will be enforced within the state. Members of Parliament and the Prime Minister have ultimate legal power because they propose and enforce legislation. Citizens have no legal sovereignty because they don’t play a role in the legislative function even though pressure group activity may influence decisions. Political sovereignty is where real political power lies, and depending on the situation political sovereignty doesn’t always lie within Parliament. Critics have argued that due to recent changes, Parliament is no longer truly sovereign. This essay will assess the arguments for and against.…

    • 1659 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The rejection of constitutionalism by Charles I’s sour relationship with the Parliament and Oliver Cromwell’s dissolving of Parliament, along with the acceptance of constitutionalism through the Glorious Revolution during the reign of William and Mary all resulted in a strong English power and newly reinforced parliamentary rights.…

    • 637 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Glorious Revolution

    • 432 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Glorious Revolution of 1688 involved the overthrow of King James II from the throne of England. James, throughout his short reign, attempted to catholicize the army and government by getting his supporters into Parliament. When James had a son, England united against the prospect of a Catholic dynasty and sought help from William of Orange. William arrived in England in November of 1688 and marched unopposed all the way to London. James fled to France and after he was denounced by Parliament, William of Orange was offered the throne if he would accept limitations on his powers. He accepted.…

    • 432 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Bill of Rights of 1689

    • 1052 Words
    • 5 Pages

    It was result of mounting pressures to remind the King Charles I of the Rights laid out in the Magna Carta(1215) which he clearly challenged by dissolving the parliament and governing by decree. The concept of the “divine” right of the King was directly questioned in that document something that provoked the English Civil War. In the aftermath of the civil war the battle between the Parliament and the monarchy continued relentless.…

    • 1052 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Admin Law summary

    • 11264 Words
    • 46 Pages

     Allows for legislative process: King can only say Yay or Nay – can’t change…

    • 11264 Words
    • 46 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Parliamentary Sovereignty

    • 1095 Words
    • 3 Pages

    It is often said that the United Kingdom (UK) does not have written constitution, referring to the absence of a single, codified set of constitutional rules and regulations. Despite that, the UK is almost unique in this respect as they practice the doctrine of parliamentary sovereignty. According to Lord Styen in the case of R v Jackson, the doctrine of parliamentary sovereignty is a creation of the court as it is the judiciary that has created and maintained the doctrine as a basic principle of the constitution. There are two types of sovereignty being legal sovereignty and political sovereignty. Legal sovereignty is also called constitutional sovereignty where it recites in the Parliament and is recognized and enforced by the court. Political sovereignty is the actual sovereignty where it recites in the people.…

    • 1095 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The doctrine of parliament sovereignty establishes the supreme law making body of England which is the legislature. The statutes created by the parliament are non justiciable which shows the capacity of parliament as a retrospective law making body. Though this is the fact, it was different before the 'Glorious Revolution' of 1688. The unlimited parliament legislative authority was not always being accepted in courts. In the case of Dr Bonham's it is stated that the common law had the power to control Acts of parliament and sometime declare them to be void and similarly in Day v Savadge the view was expressed that if an Act was against natural equity in that it made a man a judge in his…

    • 1691 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Caribbean Jurisprudence

    • 297 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In exercising their supreme and original right to establish the principles for their future government, the sovereign ‘people’ have chosen to organize their government into its various departments. One of these departments is the Judiciary – the Court itself. The Court therefore derives the authority to address the people created by the Constitution from that very instrument they themselves have uttered into existence in the exercise of their sovereign will. The Court is therefore a representative institution of the sovereign people – a necessary condition of political authority in a democratic polity.…

    • 297 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Declaring rights

    • 372 Words
    • 2 Pages

    It is also important to note how the forms of declarations of rights changed over time, which involves aversion of tyranny, although the monarchs were still able to manage the parliament.…

    • 372 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    There are several arguments applicable to the context of the constitution of the United Kingdom (UK); the effect of the UK constitution not being composed of written or codified rules, the doctrine of rule of law as put forward by Professor Albert Venn Dicey in ‘The Law of the Constitution’ 1 and the doctrine of parliamentary sovereignty and the effects of the new Labour government’s encouragement of devolution, joining of the European Union (EU) and suggested reform of the House of Lords thereon.…

    • 966 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Briefly, parliamentary sovereignty refers to the legislative supremacy of the UK Parliament. It means that there is no limit (apart from any self-imposed limit) on the capacity of the House of Commons, the House of Lords and the Crown to enact laws in the UK. The UK Parliament is the principal source of UK law.…

    • 5659 Words
    • 23 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Before the 17th century, the monarch had all three powers, the legislative, executive and judicial powers. The judiciary started gaining independence since the Case of Prohibitions 1607 and was fully independent after the Act of Settlement 1700, which effectively removed the power of the monarch to remove a judge at will. The independence of the legislature started with the Case of Proclamation 1611 and culminated in the Bill of Rights 1689, which curbed future arbitrary behaviour of the monarch and guaranteed Parliament’s power vis a vis the Crown. With these changes made to the UK constitution and as support grew for a democratic government, RP seemed out of place in the hands of the monarch and was slowly transferred into the hands of the government to be used in the name of the Crown.…

    • 1582 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays