Preview

Online Defamation Law

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2416 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Online Defamation Law
Online Defamation Law
The Bloggers' FAQ on Online Defamation Law provides an overview of defamation (libel) law, including a discussion of the constitutional and statutory privileges that may protect you.
What is defamation?
Generally, defamation is a false and unprivileged statement of fact that is harmful to someone's reputation, and published "with fault," meaning as a result of negligence or malice. State laws often define defamation in specific ways. Libel is a written defamation; slander is a spoken defamation.
What are the elements of a defamation claim?
The elements that must be proved to establish defamation are:
1. a publication to one other than the person defamed;
2. a false statement of fact;
3. that is understood as
• a. being of and concerning the plaintiff; and
• b. tending to harm the reputation of plaintiff.
• If the plaintiff is a public figure, he or she must also prove actual malice.
Is truth a defense to defamation claims?
Yes. Truth is an absolute defense to a defamation claim. But keep in mind that the truth may be difficult and expensive to prove.
Can my opinion be defamatory?
No—but merely labeling a statement as your "opinion" does not make it so. Courts look at whether a reasonable reader or listener could understand the statement as asserting a statement of verifiable fact. (A verifiable fact is one capable of being proven true or false.) This is determined in light of the context of the statement. A few courts have said that statements made in the context of an Internet bulletin board or chat room are highly likely to be opinions or hyperbole, but they do look at the remark in context to see if it's likely to be seen as a true, even if controversial, opinion ("I really hate George Lucas' new movie") rather than an assertion of fact dressed up as an opinion ("It's my opinion that Trinity is the hacker who broke into the IRS database").
What is a statement of verifiable fact?
A statement of verifiable fact is a

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Business Law Quiz

    • 26730 Words
    • 107 Pages

    | Bill sued Ted for libel over statements Ted published in the company newsletter. A jury heard the case and found that no libel had occurred because the statements were true. Bill is very unhappy with this decision, but cannot sue Ted again over these statements because of the doctrine of…

    • 26730 Words
    • 107 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Slander refers to making spoken statements known to be false that are malicious and tend to damage a person's reputation, and the courts have ruled that such spoken defamations are not protected by freedom of speech.…

    • 6147 Words
    • 36 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Hillsborough Disaster

    • 3606 Words
    • 15 Pages

    Defamatory law can be found in almost all jurisdictions in the world. the most importantly, most defamation laws in the world borrows heavily form English defamation laws. The intention of these laws is to seek a fair and just balance between the freedom of speech and protection of individual privacy and reputation.…

    • 3606 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    what is crime

    • 929 Words
    • 4 Pages

    of a criminal case. If I slander somebody, I might be dragged into court, and I might have…

    • 929 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Bugusa, Inc.

    • 1676 Words
    • 7 Pages

    WIRETIME, Inc. committed a defamatory tort which is “a civil wrong where one party has acted, or in some cases failed to act, and that action or inaction causes a loss to be suffered by another party” (Melvin, 2011, p. 208). A tort was committed because WIRETIME, Inc. made a statement that will hurt the reputation of BUGusa, Inc. The statement made is “a false and defamatory statement concerning a party’s reputation, honesty, or a statement that subjected a party to hate, contempt, or ridicule. In order to qualify as defamatory, the statement must have a tendency to harm the reputation of the plaintiff” (Melvin, 2011, p. 209). Next WIRETIME, Inc. placed a defamatory advertisement in a well-known industry magazine that contained a statement that is accusing BUGusa, Inc. for having a bad product. By doing this, the dissemination of the advertisement to a third party is an element that requires the statement must somehow reach the ears or eyes of someone other than the tortfeasor and the victim, (Melvin, 2011, p. 209). Finally, the advertisement has the third element, specificity. Specificity means the WIRETIME, Inc. advertisement specified a particular party, BUGusa, Inc. and their product and services, (Melvin 2011). Because of this defamatory advertisement, BUGusa, Inc. will probably suffer damages or loss of clients because of the negative implications stated in the WIRETIME, Inc. advertisement.…

    • 1676 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Understanding Libel Quiz

    • 1364 Words
    • 6 Pages

    4. The defendant isn’t required to prove anything. He has, however, a series of defenses available to him in a libel case.…

    • 1364 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Civil Liberties

    • 469 Words
    • 2 Pages

    5. How are the standards for winning libel lawsuits different for public figures and private individuals?…

    • 469 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Introduction to Law

    • 524 Words
    • 3 Pages

    It is likely she could win a libel suit because the statement was false and it was printed with malice.…

    • 524 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cyberbullying Dbq

    • 283 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Are we really free? As Americans, we like to think that we can do what we want. But maybe it shouldn’t be that way. Most students use texting, email, and social network sites. But some students abuse the methods and cause big problems. I am recommending that the school adopt a policy that allows the school to limit students’ online speech. There are three reasons why this is a good idea: cyberbullying is a widespread problem, it is materially disruptive, and schools have a duty to protect the civil rights of students, teachers, and administrators.…

    • 283 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Tort Reform

    • 3026 Words
    • 13 Pages

    “A tort is a civil wrong resulting in injury to a person or property”; that is brought before a court to compensate the injured party (Bagley & Savage, 2010, pg 251). In order to prove an intentional tort, the following conditions must be met:…

    • 3026 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Gm 520 Research Paper

    • 4631 Words
    • 19 Pages

    There are other types of intentional torts including: Defamation and slander that may pertain to publishing concerns or to information disseminated to the public about a business or an individual in an advertisement and, product disparagement is a serious tort involving the defamation of a company’s product. Innocent criticisms may be allowed, however when the disparagement causes loss of profits or ruins a company’s reputation, the harmed company can recover damages when the criticism has been committed with malice aforethought.…

    • 4631 Words
    • 19 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    chapter 1 assignment

    • 564 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The main difference between libel and slander is how it’s imposed. Libel is a written or recorded statement of facts about someone or business while slander is a spoken defamation of a person ro a business. (Clarkson, Miller, Cross, 2012, p. 119). A libel case deals with false statements that caused harm or damage such as destroying reputation and causing humiliation for the plaintiff. On the other hand slander case involves plaintiff claiming false or misleading statement that was verbally expressed about the plaintiff and it resulted in an economic or monetary loss for the plaintiff.…

    • 564 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Yes the grocery store many have violated the law of defamation if they do not have proof that the man was actually trying to steal. Until they have actual proof they cannot say that a person was stealing just because a person thought they saw him take something. Defamation is a statement that is not true that was made against another person to a third person that could tarnish a persons’ reputation. Defamation could be slander in oral or spoken form, and can also be libel which is written or broadcasted. Just because the employee saw Mr. Man pick up a few steaks, does not mean that he was going to try and steal them.…

    • 115 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Defendants Jennifer Storms (“Storms”) and J&J Tool, LLC (“J&J Tool”) for their Answer to the Complaint of Plaintiff M&M Home Contractors, Inc. (“M&M Contractors”), herein state and allege as follows:…

    • 542 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    This is how this ties in with defamation. A person could not be found guilty of defamation, of a plaintiff that could not prove actual malice. An attorney named Megan Carter questions whether or not to print and article revealing suspect Michael Gallagher, but they have no knowledge that the story is false, therefore there is Absence of Malice, and is now justified in printing the story as…

    • 525 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays

Related Topics