To what extent are human sciences, real sciences?
“Human science fragments everything in order to understand it, kills everything in order to examine it. ” (Leo Tolstoy, War and Peace)i
There has always existed the question whether human sciences are considered real sciences and if do they really follow the established guidelines of science. The argument is that the natural sciences take a different approach to results and have a strong dependence on the observer. This is due to the fact, that in some cases human sciences have to take into account concepts, which are hard to measure like happiness or love. Likewise, the background knowledge and empathy of the observer affect the results of the experiment. When talking about human sciences is important to highlight that they don’t prove a theory, as there is no 100% certainty in any of the experiments. They only add information to the understanding of a topic or concept. To further develop my argument that states that Human sciences are scientific, the Bobo Doll Experiment will be analysed to develop this claim.
The Bobo Doll Experiment was presented by Albert Bandura to help prove his belief that all human behaviour was learned through copying and imitating, rather than through genetic factors. This experiment is still controversial to this day, as many debaters state that todays globalize society that promotes violence. Therefore children are more prone to violent behaviour than in other generations.
Dr. Albert Bandura used children on his experiment, as they have less knowledge on rules of society and less prone on behaving as the society think is right. He had four hypotheses; the first one was that children witnessing aggressive behaviour by adults would replicate their actions even if adults were not nearby. The second one states that children who have observed non-aggressive behaviour are less likely to be violent. Even less than the control group, who have not even seen an adult. (Role Model)...
Please join StudyMode to read the full document