Preview

Master

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
375 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Master
History S.A
“Wilson bored me with his Fourteen Points; even God has Ten Commandments”

This source shows us President Clemenceau’s view on Woodrow Wilson whom was the current President of America at the time. Clemenceau stated this very cleverly as he says very discreetly that Wilson thinks himself better than God as ‘God only has ten commandments’. Clemenceau also thinks that Wilson’s points are commandments so the other major powers have to abide and serve these points.
In some cases I do agree with this as Wilson and his country did not start and fight in the war since the beginning but when he does join the war had almost come to an end with a lot of help by sending resources but Wilson should not have had that much say in the treaty of Versailles as they hadn’t lost as many men or they hadn’t had lost their wealth like the other major powers had. Lastly Wilson brought these points across so the other super powers could not get revenge which would of satisfied them.
On the other hand I don’t really agree with this as Wilson didn’t manage to force his points or ‘Commands’ at other super powers as Germany didn’t get self-determination like the East of Europe did. Secondly Clemenceau did get the majority of what he wanted as he bankrupted Germany, he got his land back, he made the Saar land a demilitarized area and he got some of the profits in which Germany made.
However you do have to question the provenance of the source as it came from a British reporter so we have to assume that is bias as the media was still being controlled by the government, so the British government might have wanted the public to think that France and America was getting all that they wanted and the British where barely getting any of their demands.
To conclude I do agree with Clemenceau’s statement as America only joined the war at the end and they came and demanded that there should be equal piece but they hadn’t experienced the first years of the war, but we still have to

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Master

    • 1028 Words
    • 5 Pages

    You have been given the chance to spend a day with a famous person of your choosing. This person may be a character from a book, a movie, television or some other source. Why did you choose the person you did? Why is meeting with this person important to you?…

    • 1028 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    After the war ended, Allied leaders and President Wilson were faced with putting Europe back together the way it was before the war. Certain events led to the Senate’s defeat of the treaty. Wilson was an optimistic progressive, with striking policies for the outlook of Europe. Many of these plans were shut down by other leaders; Wilson still approved the conditions of the Treaty of Versailles because his prime issue, the League of Nations, was still included. Many people of the world did not see the League as a good idea. They wanted and were promised the war to end in a peace and “moralize nationalism”, but the treaty did not reach their expectations (Document B). It planned to prevent effects that were conflicting by using the same things for opposition. It wanted to use force to destroy force, militarism to prevent militarism, et cetera (Document A). Americans recognized that the resolutions projected and allowed by Wilson were condemned to fail.…

    • 696 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    After the long and deadly First World War, of which the U.S. had been embroiled in for over a year, people were finally ready for their soldiers to come home. Some were even ready for peace. However, many Europeans had lost everything in the war and were not ready for peace. They were ready for revenge. The Treaty of Versailles reflected those sentiments. Internationally, the battle over the terms of the Treaty of Versailles was between those, such as Woodrow Wilson, who wanted a “peace without victory” and those who wanted to punish Germany for starting the war. At home in America, the battle over the treaty was quite different. It was a bitter dispute with no resolution, but many unintended consequences. The failure of the U.S. government to ratify the Treaty of Versailles and join the League of Nations resulted in American isolationism and a lack of oversight in Germany, both of which were contributing factors to the beginning of the Second World War.…

    • 1583 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    When war broke out about Europe on the 28th of July in 1914, Wilson made sure the nation new his stance. 21 days after war was declared he gave a message to Congress (Document A) stating that he favored neutrality as a strategy and everyman loving America would as well. He supported this because many citizens of the United States had heritage leading to a side of the war and America entering the war would splinter America. Wilson was correct in his assumption that most Americans did not want to enter the war at that time. The American people to that point had tried to stick with an isolationist’s attitude. Though the people wanted neutrality there were still some debates about how America was going about it. Document B displays a common thought during this time that while America claimed neutrality they actually favored the Allied powers. Munsterburg who wrote this letter was an extremely well educated man but he did not acknowledge in his letter the effect the blockade had America’s claimed neutrality.…

    • 1169 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Woodrow Wilson, like many so called “great men”, was a complicated figure. His character provides much room for interpretation and conflicting views. Jan Schulte-Nordholt and Elizabeth Cobbs Hoffman proved quite different views of him in their, “Woodrow Wilson: A Life for Peace”, and, “American Umpire”, respectively. The first depicts him as a man of principle to a fault. He attempted to apply american values to Europe, and as such, was bound to fail. Moreso, he was so obsessed with doing this, that he dropped his more practical ideas for peace, in favor of the more radical League of Nations. Indeed, he implies that this led to a “bad peace” creating World War II, that may have been prevented by adhering to his fourteen points. While the second also sees him as a moral figure, it shows that none of his ideas were radical. As she states, “Wilsonism, therefore, preceded the birth of Woodrow Wilson by decades if not centuries.” This makes perfect sense, as Wilson was not, in fact, a politician, but a political science academic, who would have studied the proposed and actual political institutions of the past similar to the League of Nations. As to which was more correct, that is a more complicated question. Wilson was very much a dreamer who hoped for a peaceful utopia, or at least, this is what he presented. However, the means by which he hoped to get there were in no way new. They were used on an unprecedented scale however. He didn’t just want peace in Europe, he wanted…

    • 972 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Versaille Treaty Dbq

    • 772 Words
    • 4 Pages

    (Doc A) Americans who oppose the Versaille Treaty are afraid of losing sovereignty. Americans who opposed the Versaille Treaty are also fear if they join another alliance, the League of Nations, they will be drug into another war. For example, the Woman's Peace Party was divided on the issue of the League of Nations (Doc H). The women believed that the alliance the United States joins should be an “adequate international organization”. The Versaille Treaty is ineffective because it does not offer a solution for problems caused by imperialism as well as nationalism (Doc B). Not only is the Versaille Treaty ineffective, but it setting up the world for another world war. Keynes says, “The policy of reducing Germany to servitude for a generation, of degrading the…

    • 772 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The final treaty that was agreed on was the Treaty Of Versailles. Germany thought they were getting Wilson’s peace plan but instead, they got this. The Treaty of Versailles consisted of many ways of punishing Germany. The war guilt clause was a part of the treaty. The war guilt clause stated that Germany had to accept the blame of causing the war. Another part noted that Germany had to give up it’s colonies. It also consisted of the fact that Germany had to pay all war costs. This means they had to pay their war cost, as well as the Allies‘ war costs, which was over $200 billion. The Allies also wanted to disarm Germany. This meant that they wanted to cut off Germany’s army and navy, so they wouldn’t be able to fight another war for a long time.…

    • 793 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    French Revolution Dbq

    • 604 Words
    • 3 Pages

    decision. The americans won the war but it also led France drown in the immensive costs of…

    • 604 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    While America still continued to express neutrality, that did not stop Wilson from trying to end the war with his peace plan. Despite his best efforts, the United States ended up in war with Germany. In his war message to Congress Wilson stated, “The wrongs against which we now array ourselves are no common wrongs; they cut to the very roots of human life.” Wilson had fought for neutrality and peace throughout his first term and although it was hard for him to make a declaration of war, he believed that when it came to protecting lives, especially those of the United States, going to war was a necessary action. “With a solemn and even tragical character of the step I am taking and of the grave responsibilities it involves, but in unhesitating obedience to what I deem myself constitutional duty…” Woodrow Wilson wanted…

    • 531 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Despite this Wilson was one of the first modern leaders to clearly see the threat an all out war had for civilization at the time while at the same time Wilsons excessive actions would get the United States into perilous situations that could provoke a world threatening war. Wilsons had a vision of the United States having a global role in bringing about international peace and democracy through use of small scale military force in places like the Philippines and through political alliances like the League of Nations. Wilson had envisioned the League of Nations but the United…

    • 1647 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    * Finances, if Germany had won the United States had too much invested towards Britain and France.…

    • 602 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    When the peace processes were to start after the finishing of World War One, there were four people who were major components in the treaty of Paris: Clemenceau, George, Orlando, and Wilson. Clemenceau wanted revenge on the German's by punishing them through the treaties because he believed that they were at fault for the war; George was in agreement with Clemenceau although he did not feel that Germany should suffer severe punishment; Orlando who wanted the irredenta to be re-established; and President Wilson of the United States of America wanted to create a mild peace with Germany in a fair way. In view of this, Wilson created fourteen points that he wanted accomplished in full as a result of the peace treaties. His fourteen points were his plan for a world peace and included plans for the end of secret treaties, freedom of the seas, free trade, arms reduction, the just settlement of colonial claims, the establishment of a League of Nations, and the evacuation of occupied territories and national self-determination. Many of his points were carried out in the Treaty of Versailles, although not all of them were successful or followed completely.…

    • 1282 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Neutrality In WW1

    • 1296 Words
    • 6 Pages

    “Neutrality is no longer feasible or desirable where the peace of the world is involved and the freedom of its peoples, and the menace to that peace and freedom lies in the existence of autocratic governments backed by organized force which is controlled wholly by their will, not by the will of their people. “ President Woodrow Wilson spoke these words to set the tone for the war his country was going to fight in. Wilson had to make this speech for justify his reasoning to enter the current war that was ongoing in Europe. He knew that entering the war would be a the complete opposite of what he campaigned for in his second presidential campaign in 1916. He promised to stay out of the war, and to focus on the issues happening in America, but…

    • 1296 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    During the years when the World War I took place Wilson entered his second presidency term. At the beginning he planned to keep United States out of the war but after Germany killed thousands of people and started to attack U.S. merchant ships he changed his view. At that time, President Wilson saw Germany as the enemy. Therefore, he build an army of four million troops and sent half of them to France and that’s when for the first time Wilson reached out to Germany with the message to end the war peacefully without the need of someone to win. He had a vision of self-determination for all nations. Later, he publicized the Fourteen Points to be used as a peace maker. Not only did he come up with peace terms, but he also stated ways to make the…

    • 188 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The speech declared that World War I (specifically the United State’s involvement in it) was being fought for a moral cause (Eaton, 1919). Wilson hoped that by openly announcing this justification for American involvement in the war it would help keep America unlinked from the European nationalistic disputes and ambitions, both during and after the war. Wilson’s Fourteen Points speech was also meant as a preemptive call for peace in Europe after the war ended and was the only explicit statement of war aims by any of the nations that were involved in the active fighting of the war (Unger, 2007). Since it was the only public statement of war aims that was given (as well as being quite fair to every nation involved in the war), it became the basis for the terms of the German surrender at the end of the war. The speech was also widely distributed as an instrument of allied propaganda; copies were dropped behind German lines to encourage the Central Powers to surrender in the expectation of a just settlement (Bowle, 1958).…

    • 1397 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays