Is The Media Contributing To The Sensationalization of The Crimes Occurring In Our Country

Is The Media Contributing To The Sensationalization of The Crimes Occurring In Our Country

Let's be real , the media and press are bias and favor one side of the story, of course if the press publicizing an article roots for the opposing team they'll tell you it's the acting government's fault for everything that's going bad presently even if it does not make sense at times. Sometimes the media publicizes things mainly simply just to have an audience, truth of the matter is no one likes boring news, we can't blame them for showing the “hot news” as said in Belize. But due to freedom of speech things are said that moves the public in a certain way that should not be, many people seem to believe anything they hear or see on the news primarily on T.V. Simply because it's on T.V. This is where the public knowledge should be put in to play, and this is why I write this paper to inform you that we should stop being sheep and following any Shepard. Inform yourself on the topic before believing anything any person tells you.
For example these “GSU (Gang Suppression Unit) is involved with the murder” scandals are a horrible mix up, and the finger pointing media have chosen only things that would point evidence to the GSU being involved with the murders since the acting government was the one who granted the GSU the authority to carry out such movement against gangs. These dead men we're all affiliated with the George Street Gang, allowing for alleging that the GSU could have been involved since the interviewed friends and relatives of the deceased claim that the nemesis gang could have never been involved since the apartment building was considered the headquarters of this gang. “ Only a police officer could have walked in there with no problem” - said an interviewed civilian.
Other evidence such as the sign of no forced entry also allowed for such implications. The media failed to suggest the idea of a fellow gang member who simply was a jealous person or even a rouge killer. The biased media only tells you what the interviewed civilians would say , only things blaming the GSU and the government for this very gorge scene. We can clearly tell that facts win over opinion any sane human knows this so now tell me why would you believe a random civilian's opinions who is related to a known gang member? For all we know this could have been planned to remove all GSU forces, Makes you think twice huh? Like if even the media could be involved with this and is why they're making such a big deal over this.
I could be wrong, but for writing this paper I conducted strong research, is that not more reliable than an opinionated hatred interview? Research proves that 89% of what is said in the media is untruthful and is said only to attract the audiences attention and keep them watching because the truth can turn out to be boring in the world of entertainment and like all other programs on T.V. , The radio and the Internet , Media and press are simply other means of entertainment.
The media is surely making this bigger than it has to be, and is being very much bias with the information. Literally swaying public opinion in the direction they would want it to go. So as an educated individual I question you, don't you find it funny when words are cut out and edited in interviews, what really goes on in the editing room of the media. Next time you watch the news will you think the same way?