Human Resource Management
CASE 1
Case questions and answers
Question.no.1 Discuss what a manager should do in each of the two Michigan cases. Answer: Office Equipment repair technician Although it is risky but the manager should give him a second chance, because by the nature of job (i.e. job of technician) it does not seem that he would be in direct contact with potential victims. It is risky because the job is a field job that is visiting other organizations and repairing their equipments. It is also possible that other organizations might have potential victims in their equipment area. If the technician does something wrong, the image of the employer may get harmed. The manager should test the employee’s future intentions through a question answer session, and if he appears to be honest and responsible about his future actions, then he should be give him a second chance. School bus driver The employer must be removed him from employment as he is in direct contact with potential victims on daily basis and it is never certain when he will repeat his past illegal acts no matter how hard working he is as the safety issues must be first considered. Question.no.2 What circumstances might lead you to make different decisions in different cases under Megan’s Law? Answer: Office Equipment repair technician Our decision is to rehire him because; it does not seem that he would be in direct contact with potential victims. Our decision would be different if the employee would be in direct contact with potential victims, for example. if he would be doing such jobs like, health care facilitating (e.g., nurse or aide), day caring and schooling (e.g., teacher), security (e.g., guard), social and mental health facilities (e.g., social or mental health worker), taxi and bus services (e.g., drivers), and recreational facilities (e.g., fitness trainer).
Page 2
tsa nR sisalanA esaC
School bus driver Our decision is to fire him from the job. Our decision would be different if: 1. The employee
Case questions and answers
Question.no.1 Discuss what a manager should do in each of the two Michigan cases. Answer: Office Equipment repair technician Although it is risky but the manager should give him a second chance, because by the nature of job (i.e. job of technician) it does not seem that he would be in direct contact with potential victims. It is risky because the job is a field job that is visiting other organizations and repairing their equipments. It is also possible that other organizations might have potential victims in their equipment area. If the technician does something wrong, the image of the employer may get harmed. The manager should test the employee’s future intentions through a question answer session, and if he appears to be honest and responsible about his future actions, then he should be give him a second chance. School bus driver The employer must be removed him from employment as he is in direct contact with potential victims on daily basis and it is never certain when he will repeat his past illegal acts no matter how hard working he is as the safety issues must be first considered. Question.no.2 What circumstances might lead you to make different decisions in different cases under Megan’s Law? Answer: Office Equipment repair technician Our decision is to rehire him because; it does not seem that he would be in direct contact with potential victims. Our decision would be different if the employee would be in direct contact with potential victims, for example. if he would be doing such jobs like, health care facilitating (e.g., nurse or aide), day caring and schooling (e.g., teacher), security (e.g., guard), social and mental health facilities (e.g., social or mental health worker), taxi and bus services (e.g., drivers), and recreational facilities (e.g., fitness trainer).
Page 2
tsa nR sisalanA esaC
School bus driver Our decision is to fire him from the job. Our decision would be different if: 1. The employee