Preview

Essay Writing Plan

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
646 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Essay Writing Plan
Introduction:
Topic:
How through a position of power did Commodus have an impact on the history of his time?
Hypothesis:
Commodus was a disconnected and self-indulgent leader, his inability to rule Rome caused the start of the ‘Imperial Decline’
Context:
Caesar Marcus Aurelius Commodus Antoninus Augustus, commonly referred to as Commodus, was the only surviving son and heir of Marcus Aurelius. He was born in 31 August AD 161 in Lanuvium, south-east of Rome. At the age of five, he, along with his younger brother, Marcus Annius Verus, was named Caesar (junior Emperor). However the latter later died which left Commodus as the only surviving son and heir. In AD 177, after the revolt of Cassius, Marcus Aurelius gave Commodus the title of Augustus, therefore making him joint emperor. Commodus was 16 at this time and it was accepted that the power still lay primarily with his father. However three years later in AD 180 Marcus Aurelius died, making Commodus the sole Emperor of Rome.
Paragraph 1:
Focus Question:
Why did Commodus’ reign have such a bad effect on Rome?
Topic Sentence:
Commodus was simple minded and easily lead, he was more interested in focusing on his own indulgences than running the Empire.
Explanation:
- When Marcus Aurelius died, left him surrounded by some of best men in the senate to guide him..
- reign filled with bad decisions- first one made treaty with fathers enemies
- neglected duties, brutal & cruel, mentally unstable?
- Commodus’ reign caused the state of Rome’s Economy to plummet
Example:
‘He was not naturally wicked, but on the contrary, as guileless as any man that ever lived. His great simplicity, however, together with his cowardice… - Dio Cassius
Link to hypothesis and conclude paragraph:
Commodus was power hungry and greedy, however he was not prepared to bare the responsibilities that came with that power. His lack of interest gained not only him, but Rome, many enemies.

Paragraph 2:
Focus Question:

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Julius Caesar was Roman’s dictator in Julius Caesar. However, He was popular with the common people because he provided entertainment, reduced their debt, conquered land for Rome, and was charisma.…

    • 77 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Roman emperor Caligula was one of the crulest rulers around. He would enjoy torturing people.He became emperor by smothering the last emperor (Tiberius) and the empire fell into his hands. He ruled for 5 years before being murdered. Before he bécame a amperes he was a politician.…

    • 277 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The emperor Gaius is a very misunderstood man, who is often brandished with the label of being ‘Mad’ both by ancient and modern scholars. However, it is my belief, it was the absolute power given to him, at such a young age, which caused him to have a mental breakdown. As emperor, he had no one but himself to stop him doing whatever his heart desires, which explains his increasingly cruel and erratic behaviour between AD 37 when Caligula fell ill and AD 41 when the Praetorian Guard took matters into their own hands and assassinated the 29-year-old emperor. The immense power that Gaius was given is bet described by Ferrill, “The powers it had taken Augustus a lifetime to accumulate, Caligula received in a single moment” .…

    • 2510 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Marcus Aurelius was born on April 20, 121 AD into a family of royalty. His uncle and adoptive father, Antoninus Pius, was the emperor of Rome. Aurelius, too, was trained from birth to be a great ruler like his father. At age eleven, he dedicated himself to religion, although he considered philosophy to be the "true, inward" religion, one which did not require ceremonies necessary in others. He was appointed by Emperor Hadrian to priesthood in 129. The Emperor also supervised his education, which was with the best professors of literature and philosophy of the time. From his early twenties, he deserted his other studies for philosophy. In 161, Marcus Aurelius ascended the throne and shared his imperial power with his adopted brother Lucius…

    • 828 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    his death. At the age of 16, Nero became emperor of Rome, this was the youngest up until that…

    • 910 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    He took power in 27 B.C. After this he went by the title Augustus, and during his reign what used to be the roman republic, turned into a empire. It turned into an empire by having a pax romana. Pax romana means roman peace. Taking power away from the senate, having a strong army, and being lead by a brilliant leader all lead to the pax romana which led to an empire. The empire was similar to the republic by the fact that all citizens had a voice in what was done. But its also different by the fact that in the republic the ssenate had a big say in what was done, but in the empire the senate’s say didn’t have as much as affect as it did in the…

    • 849 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Roman history was known for having many bad emperors and Nero was amongst one of them. He became famous for his self-indulgence and cruel behavior. He was the last emperor from his period. Nero was the first to persecute Christians and set a model for that religion's oppression that went on and on for many years. Augustus had brought and secured harmony to the Roman Empire and during his reign he combined a range of powers. Caligula four years as emperor were bizarre and after his assassination, his uncle, Claudius came into power. Often depicted as a mug, he was able to show his capability as an emperor from time to time. After Claudius died, Nero came to power.…

    • 538 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Think about having lived in what was thought to be the mightiest of all empires. Now,…

    • 640 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Antonius Pius had a pretty uneventful reign, but he did defy the Senates wishes by having Hadrian deified. Marcus Aurelius and Lucius Verus were both adopted by Antonius Pius and were co-emperors from 161-169 when Verus died. Marcus Aurelius and his wife had many children, out of which the only son to survive was Commodus, who Marcus Aurelius had succeed him as heir. Commodus like both Caligula and Nero was rather young when he ascended into power, but unlike them he had been co-emperor with his father.…

    • 1202 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    While initially seen as a fair ruler this can be most contributed to the level heads and knowledge given from those who primarily advised the young ruler, and as his advisers left him to his own resources we can see the slow decline and shift in Emperor Nero’s priorities and desires. His perceived lack of caring for the support of the Roman people that eventually promulgated his down fall and resulted in his death. In other words best intentions are often laid barren and to waste when focus is…

    • 925 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Emperor Nero was a sick human being who seriously lacked humility. He thought of himself as a god and would perform inhumane deeds such as stealing from sacred temples or killing innocent Christian people. Nero roughly killed about one hundred thousand Christians for no good reason whatsoever. He would use them to light up his parties or he would throw them into the gladiator pit, facing them against ferocious animals or deadly ruthless warriors. Nero's serious lack of humility caused him to perform poorly as a leader. If Nero had shown more humility throughout his time as leader, he would most likely have been not only a better person, but also a better leader. A good leader needs to display virtue in order to lead his people to…

    • 129 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    was because it was a way to control the nobles. He also fought numerous wars, some which he…

    • 1826 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Sometime during his ruling, he fell terribly ill for two months. It is said that his extravagant and insane behaviour began after his recovery from this unknown illness. It appears that Caligula never fully recovered from his illness and heightened his mental instability. Suetonius a Roman historian quoted, “Up to this point I have written as If about a Princeps, everything else I write concerns the monster.” He was writing about him during the time of the Roman Empire where even his judgement was a misperception and altered over time as he started to realise that his actions were crazed, ruthless and evil. Caligula started to commit horrible actions such as killing and torturing people for fun. It is to be noted however that this was considered normal and happened on a daily basis in the Roman Empire, as Caligula was not the only emperor that took people’s lives. One of Caligula’s most famous and well known quote was “Let them hate me, so long as they fear me.” This clearly indicates that he had little regard for how people perceived him or being popular, as he had the absolute power and willingness to kill, injure, humiliate or exile anyone who opposed, disagreed with him or were a threat to him. As long as he had complete power and authority over his people, he used fear and threats in order to…

    • 609 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Morality In Rome

    • 521 Words
    • 3 Pages

    As stated in bibleblender.com, "With morals in decline, the self-centered rich and poor alike begin to take advantage of the “system” with the rich seeking unfair tax advantages and government favor while the poor take unfair advantage of freely available social benefits. With all their needs met, they become lazy leading to declines in productivity and a stifling of innovation." Those with everything were not tempted to strive for greatness, to achieve something more, as they felt that they already had everything in the world. Those with the power felt they were and would remain untouched, which led to the spending on lavish and, frankly, useless expenditures. When the populations reach two extremes, those with too much wealth, and those with nothing, the "civility is destroyed and the society becomes unstable." Commodus would "shut down the entire city so citizens could attend races and matched rather than work. His government was thoroughly corrupted, operating using bribes and favors. As a result, Rome began to run out of money. As Rome neared bankruptcy, and lavish entertainment and gifts were slowly discontinued, the public began to revolt." More often than not, there will be an uprising by the people, and the greed of those in power led to revolts from those who had little. Rome was one car trying to drive in two very different directions, and as a result, the car broke down and Rome, the Great Empire that it once was, fell.…

    • 521 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Maximus's strengths are Commodus's weakenesses. Commodus realises this and holds Maximus in contempt. Maximus is everything Commodus aspires to be. Whilst Maximus's glass is full of orthodox qualities, Commodus's is almost empty, apart from a few unvirtuous qualities he embodies. It is this emptiness that makes his lack of moral fibre so transparent. Marcus Aurelius sees through the glass and intends to deny Commodus succession by reverting Rome to a Republic. It is here in Commodus's murder of his father that we see the true extent of his destructive capacity.…

    • 862 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays

Related Topics