Preview

Essay Question

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
583 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Essay Question
The six forms of deferred (stock) compensation include: Incentive stock options, Non-statutory stock options, Restricted stock, Phantom stock plans, Discount stock options, and Stock appreciation rights.
Incentive stock options entitle executives to purchase their companies’ stock in the future at a predetermined price.
Compared to incentive stock options, non-statutory stock options do not qualify for favorable tax treatment. Executives’ pay income taxes on the difference between the discounted price and the stock’s fair market value at the time of the stock grant.
Restricted Stock means that executives do not have any ownership control over the disposition of the stock for a predetermined period, often 5–10 years. Executives must sell the stock back to the company for exactly the same discounted price they had at the time of purchase if they terminate their employment before the end of the designated restriction period.
A phantom stock plan is a compensation arrangement whereby boards of directors promise to pay a bonus in the form of the equivalent of either the value of company shares or the increase in that value over a period of time.
Discount stock option plans are similar to non-statutory stock option plans with one exception. Companies grant stock options at rates far below the stock’s fair market value on the date the option is granted.
Stock appreciation rights provide executives income at the end of a designated period, much like restricted stock options; however, executives never have to exercise their stock rights to receive income.
Unions generally do not support companies’ use of contingent workers and flexible work schedules. Most union leaders believe that alternative work arrangements threaten members’ job security and are prone to unfair and inequitable treatment. The most common concerns include:
Employers exploit contingent workers by paying them lower wages and benefits than core employees. Employers’ efforts to get cheap labor

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Stonemor Partners Case

    • 1257 Words
    • 6 Pages

    These programs include short-term elements, such as annual base salary and annual incentive cash bonus and also equity based awards, which are longer term elements. Officers will also receive health, disability and life insurance benefits and automobile allowances and they are also entitled to a defer portion of their compensation pursuant to the company's 401k retirement plan. According to the report, these programs are designed to bring in and retain high quality executive officers so that they can be motivated to achieve the company's business goals and maximize the value of their unitholders' investment by aligning the interests of their executive officers with the interests of the company's unitholders. The business goals for these compensation programs include an increase in revenue, profits and cash distributions from existing operations, facilitate the growth of the business through acquisitions, promote a cohesive team effort and provide a workplace environment that fosters compliance with the laws and regulations applicable to the business. The elements to further the business goals of the compensation program don't have a special formula for allocating between long or short-term compensations, cash or non-cash or different forms of non-cash compensation. These are determined by the board…

    • 1257 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Dunlap Case

    • 815 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The compensation package achieved Sunbeam’s goals of maximizing shareholders wealth. It motivated Dunlap to drive up the price of the stock. Although the short term profits benefited shareholders, no incentives to create a long term, profitable company existed. In fact, it gave Dunlap an even bigger incentive to sell the company once the stock price reached a high, favorable value. Dunlap’s compensation package consisted of little to no risk and had a ten year term. The restricted stock rewards became vested in two years. His purchase of 244,898 shares indicated that profits would drastically increase. Dunlap’s compensation package affected thousands of employees at Sunbeam. The compensation package favored shareholders but disfavored employees. They had no value in this model. The compensation package only protected shareholders wealth. The structure of Dunlap’s compensation package was aligned his views of shareholder primacy. He sacrificed values for a boost in stock price and economic efficiency. The stockholders of Sunbeam greatly profited, and Dunlap reaped a majority of the benefits. The compensation package should relate to performance in order to produce the right incentives. The compensation package provided Dunlap with an excessive amount of shares of stock and stock rewards, but at least it provided an…

    • 815 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Chapter 1 Hw

    • 1056 Words
    • 5 Pages

    5. Topic, subtopic, and section # for the recognition of stock compensation: ASC 505 –…

    • 1056 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    According FASB, compensation plans include all arrangements by which employees receive shares of stock or other equity instruments of the employer or the employer incurs liabilities to employees in amounts based on the price of the employer’s stock. Compensation cost should be measured at the grant date based on the value of the award and is recognized over the service period, which is usually the vesting period, under the fair value based method. Compensation costs are recognized for other types of stock-based compensation plans under Opinion 25, including plans with variable, usually performance-based, features. Some stock-based compensation plans require an employer to pay an employee, either on demand or at a specified date, a cash amount determined by the increase in the employer’s stock price from a specified level. An entity must measure compensation cost for that award in the amount of the changes in the stock price in the periods in which the changes occur. Regarding stock options, fair value is determined using an option-pricing model that takes into account the stock price at the grant date, the exercise price, the expected life of the option, the volatility of the underlying stock and the expected dividends on it, and the risk-free interest rate over the expected life of the option. Under the provisions of the statement 123 of the FASB it is a requirement that companies report stock options on the income statement as an expense. The provision was revised in 2005 due to the prior issues dealing with overstated income on financial statement.…

    • 999 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Murray Compensation

    • 861 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Murray Compensation, Inc. (Murray), an SEC registrant that provides payroll processing and benefit administration services to other companies, granted 100,000 “at-the-money” employee share options on January 1, 2006. The awards have a grant-date fair value of $6, vest at the end of the third year of service (cliff-vesting), and have an exercise price of $21.…

    • 861 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Stocks represent ownership of a corporation, which permits a claim to the corporation’s earning and assets (Downes & Goodman, 2010).…

    • 432 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Corp 2

    • 3330 Words
    • 14 Pages

    * If gains are divendend to the corp then they will be divs for the shareholders…

    • 3330 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    HOMEWORK ACC

    • 349 Words
    • 2 Pages

    This is a common method used by corporations to compensate executives. The presumption is that executives will work harder since they want their own stock to rise in value and, therefore, have the best interests of shareholders in mind. Employees with stock options need to know whether their stock is vested. This means the stock will retain its full value even if they are no longer employed with that company.…

    • 349 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Rwt1 Evaluation Paper

    • 2748 Words
    • 11 Pages

    Stock options are typically handed out to only the highest level managers and CEOs. However, there have been some companies that have tried offering them to lower level managers as well with mixed results. Stock options have a lot of positive and negative attributes that may make them a somewhat risky solution for alternative…

    • 2748 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    ACCT 712

    • 1128 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Fair value method - total compensation expense is computed based on the fair value of the options expected to vest on the date the options are granted to the…

    • 1128 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    On January 1, 2006 Sooner or Later Inc. granted $1,000 at-the-money employee stock options. To ensure that the company can afford to compensate their employees based on their financial performance the award will only be absolute if the revenue over the following three years is greater than 10 million dollars and if the employees are still employed with the company. Sooner or Later’s management believes that the company will have revenues in excess of 10 million dollars over the next three year period. According to FASB, Statement no. 123(R) A Corporation must use the fair value method to account for compensatory share option plans. Sooner or Later has two options: they can either use the grant date fair value of $9.00 or they can use the grant…

    • 903 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    December 16, 2004 the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Statement 123, Shared- Based Statement, which took the place of Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation and replaced Accounting Principal Board Opinion No. 25 Accounting for Stock issued to Employees. Share-based payment is “a transaction in which the entity receives or acquires goods or services either as consideration for its equity instruments or by incurring liabilities for amounts based on the price of the entity 's shares or other equity instruments of the entity. The accounting requirements for the share-based payment depend on how the transaction will be settled, that is, by the issuance of (a) equity, (b) cash, or (c) equity or cash” (Deloitte, 2010). Statement No 123 covers a variety of compensation agreements including share options, restricted share plans, performance-based awards, share appreciation rights, and employee share purchase plans. Shared-based payment will give financier and other financial statement users with additional comprehensive and unbiased financial information by having the reimbursement cost relate to the share-based payment documented on the financial statement. This cost is measured by the fair value of the company’s equity or liability tools issued. “This Statement is the result of a two-year effort to respond to requests from investors and many others that the FASB improve the accounting for share-based payment arrangements with employees” (Financial Accounting Standards Board, 2004).…

    • 1076 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    of assumptions regarding the possible bene ts of options relative to cash or stock, and then…

    • 12547 Words
    • 51 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Secondly, the terminated employee can be granted a certain amount of stocks assigned only if specific conditions are met before. Thus, one can be an owner of unvested stock represented by a number of shares of Walmart common stock and unvested performance shares under the Walmart Stores, Inc. stock incentive plan of the respective…

    • 55 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Catalytic

    • 2767 Words
    • 12 Pages

    Compensation committee, 2010. Stock option grant policy [online] Available at:< http://www.google.com.my/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=stock+option+grant+policy+&source=web&cd=1&ved=0CHEQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fphx.corporate-ir.net%2FExternal.File%3Fitem%3DUGFyZW50SUQ9NjcwODl8Q2hpbGRJRD0tMXxUeXBlPTM%3D%26t%3D1&ei=sPSnT9ThJIrYrQeZ_-TlAQ&usg=AFQjCNHn_lO6X8RssCNs_L7vxRP29BaPIg> [Accessed 8 May 2012]…

    • 2767 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Better Essays