Preview

English literature

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
274 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
English literature
In this essay I will be writing to argue to what extend is Hopper to be blame for Kingshaw death. I personally think everyone seems to blame Hooper more of his death but I somehow disagree because everyone forgets that Miss Kingshaw and Mr Hooper are so the cause of Kings haw’s death.
When Hooper said” I didn’t what you to come here” this looks like a threat for a first time coming to you house therefore this made Kingshaw had some fear in him and had him thinking something awful may happened to him when he not less notice. This making him more stress out and him freaking out and this contribute to that Kingshaw killing himself .therefore this making Hooper responsible for his dead. However, think Kingshaw is sensitive but not stupid to go kill himself because of what as Hooper said. Even though is weak, he always try to fight and defend himself from Hooper. This showing that threat wouldn’t be the cause of death, making Hooper innocent.
When hopper says “something will happen to you” this makes kings haw more worried and scared and to me it looks like another threat and

In conclusion, all the way through the novel i find out Hooper have torture Kingshaw and his mom being selfish not knowing what is going on and thinking of how to be with Mr Hooper. This tell me to some extent it Mr Hooper and Mrs kings haw on the other hand it mostly Hooper‘s fault because he hurt and cause him grief in his life a due to that kings haw suicide himself.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In the state court case verse Roger “The Dodger” Smith and Jack Merridew was a very intriguing case. I have decided that Roger “The Dodger” Smith is guilty for both accounts of murder. In addition, Jack is also guilty, for the murder of Simon, but not the murder of Piggy. Murders should never be taken lightly, even if its accidental, you must fully investigate what happened on that day.…

    • 665 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    misunderstanding from people of ill will” is the first part of King’s statement. I do not agree with…

    • 535 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    kill him or not, the ambition to be the King supersedes that and is what leads him to kill Duncan.…

    • 1256 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    at that point advances to sentiment by demonstrating the trials his kin have experienced. He does this by utilizing lines, for example, "When you have seen horrendous hordes lynch your moms and fathers freely and suffocate your sisters and siblings at impulse.", and "when you have seen despise filled policeman revile, kick, and even kill your dark siblings and sisters." In these lines he is utilizing ignitable dialect like "awful crowds" and parallelism, for example, "lynch your moms and fathers voluntarily and suffocate your sisters and siblings at impulse" by utilizing this sort of dialect and sentence structure King is influencing you to imagine and feel what he needed to see his loved ones experience in those tough circumstances. All through the entire passage utilizing this sort of sentence structure and a ton of symbolism the gathering of people begins to feel what it resembles to be in King's position and feel the torment and inconveniences he needed to experience. It is truly an enthusiastic section, and utilizing this feeling toward the start of his letter catches the consideration of his group of onlookers. This is precisely what King needed with a specific end goal to influence the crowd to feel the compelling feeling and agony he felt, and induce you to continue perusing the letter to hear what he needs to say in regards to these shock of…

    • 685 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    He emphasizes that although everything Hitler did, murdering millions of Jews, cruel scientific experiments, etc., was legal, but it was morally and humanlly unjust just. "It was illegal to aid and comfort a Jew in Hitler's Germany. But I am sure that if I had lived in Germany during that time I would have aided and comforted my Jewish brothers even though it was illegal. King by this statement, portrays his calling within the grounds of segrigation, which is bacisally that no matter if it is illegal, no matter how much trouble or even if there is a high probability of his life being lost,that he would stand up against segrigation, like a salmon going against the un-just river of…

    • 427 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Holmes discovers that Stapleton was third in line for the Baskerville fortune in the final chapter. (234) Holmes ponders that perhaps, “Stapleton did not know of the existence of an heir in Canada.” (238) The murder of Sir Charles and the attempted murder of Sir Henry were both executed by Stapleton in the hopes of inheriting the family estate. In contrast, Jack the Ripper’s motive has been speculated to be a “war on sin” (Jones, Jack The Ripper Student Resource), an attempt for social reform (Burns, Rippermania: Fear and Fascination in Victorian London), and even that he killed due to a mental disorder such as psychopathy of sociopathy (Cobb, Psychoanalysis of the Ripper). Jack the Ripper’s prospective motives, although uncertain, are unrelated to those of Stapleton. One possible explanation for this variation is the type of killer. Stapleton only kills when he needs to, but Jack the Ripper, a serial killer, killed for pleasure. Not only are their purposes vastly different, their methods also differ…

    • 671 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    paper leading into the body of my paper and valid points as to why King is such a…

    • 519 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Why Is Rodney King Wrong

    • 509 Words
    • 3 Pages

    King was able to find happiness as he married the juror in his civil case and finally found some happiness as he battled alcoholism the nightmares and addiction. He may not have the best person but I'm glad he found some happiness while he was alive. This situation taught us that we should take every person's life seriously no matter what they've done and to voice our displeasure in some other manner than destroying cities lives and reputations like law enforcement and many in the community…

    • 509 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Edmund Hooper quietly but effectively tortures Kingshaw from the moment he arrives, giving him a note saying ‘I didn’t want you to come here’ before he even got to know Kingshaw. Over the period of time that Kingshaw is staying at Warings, Hooper picks away at Kingshaw, slowly wearing him down, ‘and having Hooper come with him, taunting and bullying, wearing him down, was the worst thing he could imagine.’ Hooper uses comments and actions, even if they are minuscule, to get inside Kingshaw’s head. Kingshaw saying it was the ‘worst thing’ he could imagine emphasises how bad it is, because Kingshaw has been through some hard times in his life. Kingshaw can’t get away from Hooper, ‘he would wait and watch and listen, there would be no way of escaping without his knowledge.’ Kingshaw is like the prey, Hooper the predator tormenting its prey before it strikes, and maybe for Kingshaw the only escape is suicide.…

    • 1251 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    King evaluates the difference between just laws and unjust laws to justify his actions in Birmingham. Understanding the difference between the laws, King believes that he is subject to breaking laws as long as they are unjust. King, also, emphasizes that his cause for breaking the law is in favor of equality for all people. First, he defines what a law is in his own words. He makes a clear distinction between the different categories of laws many times. He, then, differentiate that there are just laws and unjust laws. King’s definition of a just law is “any law that uplifts human personality is just” (PAR 12). Meanwhile, the definition provided for unjust laws is “any law that degrades human personality” (PAR 12). King addresses that just and unjust laws target the personalities of the segregated and segregator. The problem with segregation is that “it gives the segregator a false sense of superiority, and the segregated a false sense of inferiority” (PAR 12). The difference in personalities leads people to believe they are better than others. It breaks the constitutional perception that “all men are created equal”. King believes “a just law is a code that a majority compels a minority to follow that it is willing to follow…

    • 1054 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    towards Kingshaw and is always evil to him. He is constantly referring to his fears…

    • 387 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Act I of The Tragedy of Macbeth written by William Shakespeare, King Duncan gets murdered. The characters in this play are trying to figure out who is to blame for his murder. There are a couple characters that could be blamed, Lady Macbeth, Macbeth, and the Witches. I feel that the witches are to blame.…

    • 471 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Laurie Pritchett challenged the provoking of violence method of King and countered, allowing for further…

    • 2105 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    We start out with the untimely death of the King’s father, and this puts him in an unfair position, but he should've been able to make a decision to go to trustworthy people for help. The help he sought after was from people who would take advantage of him, not people who were…

    • 467 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Between August and November of 1888, Whitechapel London was shaken by some of the most brutal murders to-date. With five confirmed victims, the killer, nicknamed “Jack the Ripper”, did not fall short of causing a widespread…

    • 1811 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays