Preview

Congress at the Grassroots

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1352 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Congress at the Grassroots
Richard Fenno's work, Congress at the Grassroots, provides an in depth look at the decline of the old time politics of the South in the late twentieth century. Fenno's case study examines a more recent era but confronts some of the same problems faced by the fictional governor. With changing times and technologies, how do the politics and politicians of the past fare with the modern era? In an effort to examine the recent political shifts in the Deep South and its Congressional districts, the author selected a noteworthy area--the district held by former House Speaker Newt Gingrich. Instead of selecting the controversial Gingrich as an illustration of change, Fenno chose a long-time Democratic predecessor and the Republican heir to the Georgia district. The area south of Atlanta, for generations a rural, conservative Democratic area, quickly changed to a suburban, Republican-dominated one from the 1950s to the 1990s. Fenno's goal was to provide an in depth look at this dramatic change that impacted the South and the entire nation. He also sought to examine these relationships as a cause in the increasing "polarization, along party lines" of the House of Representatives which made Congress "less civil, less manageable, and, to many, a less satisfying process" (p. 151).
In order to conduct this study, Fenno examined the careers and role of Democratic Congressman who served the district prior to Gingrich. Jack Flynt served for twenty years as the representative from the South Georgia district until his retirement in 1978. During that period he defeated two challenges from Gingrich in 1974 and 1976. He also selected Mac Collins, the former Democrat turned Republican, who succeeded Gingrich in the 1990s. In his analysis, Fenno explored what historian Dewey Grantham described as the "nationalization of southern politics" in The South in Modern America (pp. 281-310). The political realignment that began with the modern Civil Rights movement accelerated during the Reagan

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    The presidential campaign for Andrew Jackson had started early—on February 9, 1825, the day of John Quincy Adams’s controversial election by the House—and it continued noisily for nearly four years. Even before the election of 1828, the temporarily united Republicans of the Era of Good Feelings had split into two camps. One was the National Republicans, with Adams as their standard-bearer. The other was the Democratic-Republicans, with the fiery Jackson heading their ticket. Rallying cries of the Jackson zealots were “Bargain and Corruption,’’ “Huzza for Jackson,’’ and “All Hail Old Hickory.’’ Jacksonites planted hickory poles for their hickory-tough hero; Adamsites adopted the oak as the symbol of their oakenly independent candidate. Jackson’s followers presented their hero as a rough-hewn frontiersman and a stalwart champion of the common man. They denounced Adams as a corrupt aristocrat and argued that the will of the people had been thwarted in 1825 by the backstairs “bargain’’ of Adams and Clay. The only way to right the wrong was to seat Jackson, who would then bring about “reform’’ by sweeping out the “dishonest’’ Adams gang. Much of this talk was political hyperbole. Jackson was no frontier farmer but a wealthy planter. He was born in a log cabin but now lived in a luxurious manor off the labor of his many slaves. And Adams, though perhaps an aristocrat, was far from corrupt. If anything, his puritanical morals were too elevated for the job. Mudslinging reached new lows in 1828, and the electorate developed a taste for bare-knuckle politics. Adams would not stoop to gutter tactics, but many of his backers were less squeamish. They described Jackson’s mother as a prostitute and his wife as an adulteress; they printed black-bordered handbills shaped like coffins, recounting his numerous duels and brawls and trumpeting his hanging of six mutinous militiamen. Jackson men also hit below the belt. President Adams had purchased,…

    • 1840 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Jack Flynt’s reelection and primary constituencies between his transitional and new districts are both similar and different in certain aspects. The transitional district was around from 1966 to 1970. Flynt’s transitional district represented about sixteen counties which added up to a population of about 323,000. The traditional district was not too different from his original district. “The district’s dominant economic interest was textiles, farming, and some light metal and food-processing industries” (Fenno, 2000, 16). The district was a one-party Democratic district which meant that the only “serious primary contest Flynt ever had in this district was his initial 1954 victory” (Fenno, 2000, 17). After the redistricting Flynt was given his first city, Macon, as well as his “first taste of two-party politics” (Fenno, 2000, 17). Flynt’s person-to-person representation strategy won over many of the counties especially the smaller counties. “Jack Flynt’s transitional district occupied a pivotal location in the path of that shift. The burgeoning Atlanta metropolitan area was exploding into the near suburbs and gradually pushing southward toward the small rural counties that formed the core of Flynt’s political support”(Fenno, 2000, 51).”For Flynt, the county seat elites made up the core of his primary constituency─ the people whose support he most needed, most wanted, and most assiduously cultivated. They were the essential cue givers of constituency politics, the individuals who provided the ‘elite certification’ of a candidate’s qualifications that is so essential to early political success” (Fenno, 2000, 21). Jack Flynt’s primary constituency also lied with county store proprietors and their customers would make up a large part of his reelection constituency (Fenno, 2000, 22). Flynt’s primary constituency during his transitional district was made of the county seat elites, white voters, voters with agricultural and textile…

    • 1501 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    [23] William W. Rogers, Robert D. Ward, Leah R. Atkins, and Wayne Flynt. Alabama: The History of a Deep South State (Tuscaloosa: The University of Alabama Press, 1994), 49.…

    • 5055 Words
    • 21 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Throughout the course of history many campaigns and elections have changed and been influenced by the time period surrounding them. The participation in political campaigns and elections in the United States between 1815-1840 greatly changed due to the significant effects of the War of 1812. As a new era formed as a result of the war, change in our nations politics did too. This new era known as “the era of good feelings” paved the way for change within our nations elections and campaigns. Just as it had united the voters of America in the beginning, its decline resulted in a growing show of sectionalism in the voters throughout the country.…

    • 1132 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Wayne, Stephen J., G. Calvin. Mackenzie, and Richard L. Cole. Conflict and Consensus in American Politics. Belmont: Thomson/Wadsworth, 2007. Print.…

    • 2287 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hollitz Essay

    • 574 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Thomas A. Bailey’s, The Ordeal of Reconstruction (1966), presents a view that would claim the that the actions of the Northern ‘carpetbaggers’ and ‘scalawags’ were both “selfish and idealistic” in regards to the Republican government in the Southern states. Meanwhile, Bailey paints a sad picture of the once enslaved and uneducated Negroes of the Republican government, a role that he attributed as “pathetic and tragic.”…

    • 574 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Henry Grady

    • 949 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Henry Grady goes down in Georgia’s hall of fame as one of their greatest and most influential journalists and orators. After graduation from the University of Georgia, he went on to his career as general editor and part-owner of the successful newspaper, the Atlanta Constitution1. Grady used the Atlanta Constitution as a foundation to convey his political messages. He was a firm Democrat and joined a group of other strong-willed Democrats that he eventually led called the Atlanta Ring2. Grady was effective in endorsing their political views through The Constitution, demonstrated by the fact that he was able to get his like-minded fellow Ring members Joseph E. Brown elected to the Senate in 1880, and John B. Gordon elected to Governor in 18863. After Grady’s influence in politics and public opinion had been established, he moved his focus to public speaking to further channel his agenda.…

    • 949 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Civil War Origins and Legacy

    • 2553 Words
    • 11 Pages

    References: America’s Reconstruction. (2003) People and Politics After the Civil War. Retrieved on August 18, 2008 from http://www.digitalhistory.uh.edu/reconstruction/introduction.html…

    • 2553 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    After Reconstruction the states that resided in the north were primarily Liberal Republican. This was due from Lincoln’s association with the Republican Party, and the role he had on equal treatment for blacks during the Civil War (Boles pg. 570). Also, the term liberal is associated with the progressive party, which means looking forward. In contrast, the south was primarily Conservative Democratic, with the term conservative associated with being stuck in old ways of doing things. This implies that they did not agree upon the equal opportunities among blacks and whites, because they viewed blacks more as servants. This way of thinking stemmed from before the Civil War, when slavery was still in common practice. So, one of the main divisions between the two parties was the issue on race. Today the south is largely associated with the Conservative Republican platforms, and the north being associated with the Liberal Democratic platforms. The purpose of this paper is to explain how the South transitioned from this solidly Democratic region to one that is today largely recognized as solidly Republican, through the platforms of key politicians had on…

    • 853 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Republican Party 1856

    • 899 Words
    • 3 Pages

    This new political party, with its history changing platform, arose out of a long and complex sequence of events. In the 1850s America’s culture was crumbling. Decades of political compromise and avoidance on the issue of slavery had kept an uneasy peace. The Mexican-American war added over 500,000 square miles to the U.S. and rekindled sectional competition for slave versus non-slave territory. Ralph Waldo Emerson prophesied, “The United States will conquer Mexico, but it will be as the man swallows the arsenic, which brings him down in turn. Mexico will poison us.”2 The balance between Northern Free states and Southern Slave states in the U.S. Senate had only been maintained by tightly controlling the admission of new states to the Union. In 1820 Missouri was ready to be admitted as a slave state. A key part of this Missouri Compromise of 1820 was to limit expansion of slave states to below the line parallel 36 degrees 30 degrees north. However after the Mexican War, Texas, California, and many other potential states insisted for admission into the Union. This reawakened the slumbering sectional conflict and the free versus slave state…

    • 899 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Secession Debated

    • 1638 Words
    • 7 Pages

    “The parties are all dead, let them be buried and with them let us bury all the political and personal animosities which they have engendered and as brothers, as friends, as Georgia’s sons, let us come and take council together, how we shall avenge her wrongs, promote her prosperity and preserve her honor.”…

    • 1638 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    United States Congress

    • 5336 Words
    • 17 Pages

    2. How does the book describe partisan polarization in Congress? What is the explanation for why Congress today seems more polarized than it die up until the 1970s?…

    • 5336 Words
    • 17 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Contract of America

    • 1952 Words
    • 8 Pages

    In the historic 1994 midterm elections, Republicans won a majority in Congress for the first time in forty years, partly on the appeal of a platform called the Contract with America. Put forward by House Republicans, this sweeping ten-point plan promised to reshape government. Its main theme was the decentralization of federal authority, deregulation, tax cuts, reform of social programs, increased power for states, a balanced federal budget were its chief ambitions. With unusual speed, all ten items came to a vote in the House of Representatives within one hundred days, and the House passed nine of the ten measures. Yet, even Newt Gingrich who is was the Speaker of the House of Representatives and one of the key leaders of the so called Republican Revolution of the 1990’s compared the plan to the most important political reforms of the twentieth century, progress on the contract was delayed. Senate Republicans were slow to embrace it, Democrats in both chambers denounced it, and President Bill Clinton threatened to veto its most radical provisions. Only three of the least controversial measures had become law by the end of 1995 as Congress and the White House battled bitterly over the federal budget.…

    • 1952 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    America and Congress

    • 759 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In the past century, people continued to express an increasingly discontent view of Congress especially true when one looks back before the Clinton Impeachment debacle As the size of the nation and the number of congressman have grown, the congress has come under attack by both public influences and congressman themselves. Yet looking at one congressman's relationship with his or her constituents, it would be hard to believe that this is the branch of government that has come under suspect. In "If Ralph Nader says congress is 'The broken branch,' how come we love our congressman so much?" author Richard F. Fenno, Jr., provides insight into this view and why, through congress coming under fire, constituents still feel positively about there congressmen. Although congress is often criticized, its fine tuned functioning is essential in checking the power of congress without hindering the making of legislation…

    • 759 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    (2009). “Fight the Power!” The Legacy of the Civil Rights Movement. The Journal of Southern History 75.1: 3-28.…

    • 2677 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays