Preview

Complete ACL Final Exam Notes

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
10856 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Complete ACL Final Exam Notes
LECTURE 5 – DIRECTOR’S DUTIES

Overview of duties
All directors and officers of a corporation are bound by a number of general law and statutory duties. All directors owe the company equitable duties of loyalty and good faith
Act in good faith in the interests of the company
Act for a proper purpose
Avoid conflicts of interest
Retain discretion.

s185 – provides that the duties imposed by the Corporations Act are additional to the duties imposed at the common law and in equity, rather than exclusive of them. Thus a director could be sued for all three types of actions rather than just the Corporations Act.

s180(1) – the duty of care by imposing the same objective standard; is determined by what a reasonable person would do or would have believed. s181 – duties to act in good faith and for a proper purpose ss 182 and 183 – the duty to avoid conflicts of interest by prohibiting directors from making improper use of their office and information.

Problem: the enforcement of these duties and the remedies that flow from the different sources of law.
Addressed by Part 2F.1.A – allowing shareholders to litigate on the company’s behalf in certain circumstances via a statutory derivative action.
ASIC generally enforce the statutory duties arising under the Corporations Act.
Part 2D.1 – duties of company officers reflecting general law principles.

To whom are directors duties owed?
The duty is owed to the company as a whole (company is a separate legal entity) – meaning not the company as an entity outside and apart from its shareholders, but rather the general body of shareholders. Who can sue?
Greenhalgh v Ardene Cinemas Ltd [1951] Ch 286
The principle that only the company could enforce a breach of directors duties leads to the obvious practical problem that the company only acts on the initiative of the directors.
The decision that prevented individual shareholders from taking actions against

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    of Directors, which was called and held in accordance with the law and the bylaws of the Corporation,…

    • 747 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    This case is related to the director’s duties. According to the Corporation Act, five directors of De-Caffeine Delights have breached their duties as directors.…

    • 1628 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Answear

    • 499 Words
    • 2 Pages

    A) A shareholder could commence an action on behalf of the corporation against the director if he gets the court's permission to do so.…

    • 499 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    This Act was formed in 2002, which created regulation changes for directors and financial areas. The legislation structured the name based on Senator Sarbanes as well as Oxley, Michael. Sarbanes-Oxley Act, surfaced a great deal of alterations to cooperation’s. An adjustment for board of directors, is there is no longer a combination of have one CEO/Chairman. Now both are considered separate titles and have different positions. This Act can also, verify financial information, leaving any inaccurate data to be at fault of that individual. Each board must consist of at least one CFO, which audits and provides final signatures for financial documents. Inquiring that all professional involved with a company need to be more aware of those organizational…

    • 202 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    * Reasonable Person Standard – most of the time, due care is the degree of care that a similarly situated reasonable person would use in a given situation…

    • 5389 Words
    • 22 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    ILAC corporations example

    • 960 Words
    • 3 Pages

    S.181 states, “Directors must exercise their powers and discharge their duties in good faith in the best interests of the corporation and for a proper purpose” (slides). In this case Patricia has failed to act in good faith of SEPL through advising her sister that SEPL are buying a large amount of shares in FPPL. Because of Patricia’s actions, SEPL lost their chance to buy shares at a lower cost, resulting in an additional cost to SEPL of $100,000. Patricia has not…

    • 960 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Many companies are controlled by single or a group of shareholders. This is particularly common in proprietary companies. In a majority-controlled company, minority shareholders face significant problem If the controllers run the company in their own interest or act unfairly discriminatory, unfairly prejudicial or oppressively. The Corporation Act provides effective procedures to enable members to obtain remedies in circumstances where the controllers of a company act oppressively or unfairly towards them.…

    • 1434 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Unit I HW MBA5101

    • 521 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Boards of Directors have many roles and responsibilities, none of which should be taken lightly and all directly impact the success or failure of the company (Wheelen, 2010). Some of these…

    • 521 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    13. Directors of a company can be held personally liable for its actions and those of its officers.…

    • 3558 Words
    • 22 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    S180(1) of the Corporations Act 2001 Commonwealth (hereinafter referred to as The Act) states that a “director or officer of a corporation must exercise their powers and discharge their duties with the degree of care and diligence that a reasonable person would exercise if they:…

    • 3164 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    * Allen’s Arthur Robinson.2007, Directors Duties during Insolvency, 2nd Edition, and Thomson Law book Co., ISBN 9780455223490.…

    • 2110 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Business Law

    • 3089 Words
    • 13 Pages

    a) A director is an individual elected the shareholders of a corporation, who carries out certain tasks established in the charter, according to www.thefreedictionary.com. The duties are a series of common law, statutory, and equitable obligations. The duties are analogous to duties owed by trustees to beneficiaries, and by agents to principals. Directors owe duties to the corporation, and not to individual shareholders, employees or creditors outside exceptional circumstances. The duties of a director are divided in two sections, the common law duties and the statutory duties of directorship.…

    • 3089 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Company is a form of corporation and regulated by the Corporations Act. The legal significance of being as a company is it exists as a separate legal entity and dependent upon human beings to make decisions on their behalf. The person who makes or participates in making decisions that affect the whole or a substantial part of the company’s business can be defined as a director. The legal definition of director is stated under section 9 of the Corporations Act[1] which indicates that, it is more appropriate to look at the function of the people rather than at the job title itself. Duties are imposed on the directors to regular illegal behavior and ensure that they act for the benefit of the company. All directors and officers of a corporation are bound by a number of general law and statutes which include that:…

    • 1663 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Law & Ethics

    • 1154 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The board must also consider their duty of care and duty of loyalty. Duty of care requires people involved in the company to make informed and reasonable decisions for the business. Duty of loyalty requires employees to act in good faith and in…

    • 1154 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Article Reflection

    • 3620 Words
    • 15 Pages

    The fiduciary duties of directories have been clearly formulated from the cases of Pacifica Shipping Co Ltd v Andersen[1](where Andersen [the director of Pacifica Shipping Company Limited] took a deferred opportunity of the company for himself) and Canadian Aero Service Ltd v O’Malley[2]. They were restated in Kawhia Offshore Services Limited v Rutherford[3] where Rutherford (the director of Kawhia Offshore Services Limited) took a maturing business opportunity for himself. Although Kawhia was unlikely to succeed in the opportunity, Rutherford owed a duty to not allow his personal interests to conflict with the company’s interests of retaining the opportunity.…

    • 3620 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Powerful Essays