And why the rules should be much stricter
Overall stand: Child beauty pageants should be deemed illegal because: * They objectify the children in an attempt to achieve an unclear vision of beauty. * The parents more often than not force their ideals on the children in the pageants, and go to ridiculous lengths to win. * The children are being manipulated and turned into icons not appropriate for their age. * To have children compete for a title that is only defined by opinion * Infants and girls are objectified and judged against sexualistic ideals. The mental health and development consequences of this are significant and impact on identity, self-esteem and body perception. Possible Arguments against this point of view:
* There are natural child beauty pageants which are not as bad as ‘Glitz’ pageants. * Children wear makeup only if they want to
* There is no specific government which can control such an absurd idea. Beauty pageants happen in almost all countries, all which have their own idea of beauty. There is nothing that can limit the entire worlds view of what should or should not be beautiful * These pageants are legal, voluntary activities and should not be banned * May compare it to something such as ‘Driving a car is voluntary, and has risks, so should we ban it?’ Points against these arguments:
* Natural beauty pageants are not as bad as the ‘glitz’ pageants, which require the children to wear makeup in order to succeed, however the child may come to look at themselves in a negative light if they do not win the pageant, makeup or no makeup. And this will affect their view of themselves drastically. * Most of the time, unless they’re involved in natural beauty pageants which limits makeup and other image enhancing things such as wigs and false eyelashes, The parent’s have the say in whether or not the child should do something. The child can of course say no, but due to the...