Preview

Ashaba-Ahebwa Mark on Civil Law in the Ugandan Jurisdiction

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
12136 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Ashaba-Ahebwa Mark on Civil Law in the Ugandan Jurisdiction
CIVIL PROCEDURE II Lecture 1 ORDER OF PROCEEDINGS

The place and mode of trial is usually determined by type of trial and proceedings. If you make an application by summons, then you will be heard in Chambers.

Procedure 1 – where defendant elects not to call evidence

The Plaintiff or advocate makes an opening speech referred to sometimes as an opening statement. After that the plaintiff witnesses are called, examined cross examined and re-examined. After that the plaintiff or his advocate sums up the case by making a closing speech. After that the Defendant states their case and makes a closing speech.

Procedure 2 – Defence elects to call evidence

Advocates for the plaintiff makes an opening statement, the plaintiff witnesses are called, examined, cross-examined and re-examined. After that the defendant’s counsel makes an opening statement. After that the defendant’s witnesses are called, examined, cross examined and re examined. After the Plaintiff or his advocate sums up the case by making the closing speech. Thereafter the defendant sums up the case and makes a closing speech also. The Defendant can reply to the plaintiff’s closing. The reply only covers new ground.

In cases where there are many defendants and many plaintiffs the same procedure will apply but if the defendants are represented separately, then the counsels will separately make their submissions separately by order of appearance. Cross examination of witness will also follow the order in which they proceed. Co plaintiffs will normally be represented by the same counsel.

Who has the right to begin the case? Order XVII Rule 1

The plaintiff or the applicant has the right to begin. Of course there are certain exceptions to that right to begin.
1. Where the Defendant admits the facts alleged by the plaintiff but raises an objection on a part of law. In such a case the defendant should be entitled to begin by submitting on that part of the law. For

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    busa 2106

    • 1015 Words
    • 5 Pages

    9. Pleadings are a series of formal, responsive, written statements by each side stating their claims and defenses to a lawsuit.…

    • 1015 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    dynamic business law

    • 761 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Develop the appropriate legal issue(s) in question (i.e., the specific legal issue between the two parties). Provide a judgment on who should win the case - be clear.…

    • 761 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Minnoesota V. Ronald Riff

    • 1596 Words
    • 7 Pages

    In this case, the prosecuting attorney are to communications orally and also in writing. The prosecutor main goal is to prove to both the judge and jury that the defendant is in guilty. The prosecutor opening the statement of Riff did knowingly commit the crime of breaking, and burglary on September 30, 2011 between 12:10am and 12:20 am orally to the judge and jury. The incident located at the Marquette’s Market on 1234 Main St. Midtown, Minnesota 44333, which the owner of the market is known as Speedy Marquette. It the prosecutor choice to share his/her witnesses including all evidence with the defense attorney before trail begins and to present evidence against the defendant to both jury and the judge. “All witnesses in this case include: Otis Ripple, Soapy Water, Marty Martini, C. Sharp, Betty Bitty, Rusty Fender, Guido Concertino, and the arresting officer are orally examined by the prosecution, and then the defense.” (Curran, P. & Strauch, G.). When prosecutor finish presented their parts, then it’s a choice for the defense to present their part of evidence. The prosecutor has choices of whether to examine all the defense witnesses to set straight all their statements, and to make sure that the defense is being guilty. The defendant witnesses include: Red Chips, Ace Harte, Jacques, Orbedder, Vibes Blare, Sally Slick, Matilda Slick and Gigi Gig have all been questioned by their defense attorney. Now that the defense has finish point out their statement and all of the witness are being examined and crossed, and all evidence has been presented both orally and in…

    • 1596 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    This process is where witnesses are called to give their statements. They are questioned and cross examined by all lawyers/attorneys. Cross examination is being questioned by each lawyer/attorney they may ask the same questions but in different words. The prosecutor is there to make the jury believe the criminal is guilty whereas the defense attorney is there to make the jury question if the criminal is really guilty. There are also three types of witnesses which are; ordinary witnesses, expert witnesses, and character witnesses. “Ordinary witnesses can testify only as to their personal observations. Expert witnesses, on the other hand, are allowed to offer their opinions in their area of expertise. Chartacter witnesses may testify only to the general good reputation of the defendant” (Zalman,…

    • 920 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Lincoln Douglas Outline

    • 533 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Before you begin your speech briefly thank the judge and your opponent for providing the opportunity for this important debate.…

    • 533 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    2. Each team will have three, two-minute chances to speak. In the first two-minute period they will present their argument. The second two-minute period will be used for rebuttal. In the rebuttal period, a team may argue only points which the other side has presented. The third two-minute period will be a summation (summarize main talking points/close argument).…

    • 284 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Hearsay Rule

    • 992 Words
    • 4 Pages

    An attorney should set a foundation of the witness’s area of expertise and reliability. Ask the witness questions that will speak to the witnesses’ credibility and knowledge like, what is your educational background? What kind of training have you received in your field of work? Once you have established his area of expertise you should ask the court to move that witness as an expert witness in his/her area of expertise.…

    • 992 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Amateur Sports Act

    • 1349 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Next came the defendant’s opening statement. The main defense lawyer was a balding, portly man in his 50s named James Morris. He cleared his throat loudly before beginning his…

    • 1349 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The prosecutor and plaintiff are the individuals who present a case against the defendant or accused. They must present evidence, witnesses, and testimony to the jury to prove guilt or innocence. While the prosecutor and plaintiff are against the defendant the defense counsel is representation appointed for or by the defendant…

    • 757 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    how to moot

    • 1485 Words
    • 6 Pages

    After introducing yourself and your case, but before making any further argument, identify the TWO or THREE (but no more than three) issues you will discuss. Make these issues clear and straightforward. For example, "This Court should find in favor of the appellant [or respondent] for two reasons...." You should then list your main arguments. For example, "...First, because this Court does not have jurisdiction; and Second, because customary international law is applicable in this case and is on…

    • 1485 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Giving details when answering a question is also important because that lets the jury know that you are paying attention. Lawyers are known to ask multiple questions right after another, but before giving any answers you must think about what you are going to answer. Make sure that you are aware of what your answer will be. Be confident in what you are…

    • 587 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The case being observed here was that of Deborah White vs. Patrick Gibbs and O 'Malley 's Tavern, case # 82A04-8876-CV-285. This was brought before a mock U.S. District Court panel of judges, in the Northern District of Indiana. The Plaintiff being Deborah White, and the Defendant being Patrick Gibbs and O’Malley’s Tavern. The Plaintiffs’ Attorneys are Amanda Babbit and Jakson Walsh and the attorneys for the defendant are Benjamin Walton and Jordan Van Meter. In this case the defendant’s attorneys are seeking a summary Judgment for their client. This is a kind of resolution that would allow for them to avoid going to trial only if the Judge sees fit to deem that there are no disputes to the material facts of this case. And on the opposing side the Plaintiff Deborah white is requesting that the courts deny the defendants request for summary judgment.…

    • 1375 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Answer 15. Closing Argument 16. Complaint 17. Default Judgment 18. Direct Examination 19.…

    • 18216 Words
    • 73 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    robbery in progress

    • 410 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Questioning of the witnesses, as noted, begins with the request that each of them write down what they saw as soon as possible to minimize lapses in memory, and to secure a record of their observations before they have had a chance to speak with friends, family, or reporters. Such conversations can taint the credibility of the witnesses, as defense lawyers can raise the possibility that witness testimony was influenced by such interactions with other people.…

    • 410 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Civil Procedure Reviewer

    • 35176 Words
    • 141 Pages

    CIVIL PROCEDURE 3. Rule 1 – General Provisions Civil Action - One by which a party sues another for the enforcement or protection of a right, or the prevention or redress of a wrong. It may either be ordinary or special. (§3(a)) Criminal Action - One by which the State prosecutes a person for an act or omission punishable by law (§3(b)) Special Proceeding - A remedy by which a party seeks to establish a status, a right, or a particular fact (§3(c))…

    • 35176 Words
    • 141 Pages
    Better Essays